Margaret Hamburg said to be Obama's pick to head the FDA

[Ban Hammer 13,355]

Yeah so back to simple, 1:1, logic, Hamburg... makes me want to have a hamburger soon.

figures, won't say a thing about another clinton legacy showing up.

go to sleep, i'm not expecting any criticism of the obama camp from you.

Not of this particular topic, since your hardon comes from this woman being a Clintonite. Ohhhhh dirty. Time to insert sly, blue dress remark now, thereby bypassing the entire FDA in one swell Charlespost.

since you did that instead of me, can we call you a right winger now?

Only if I am you. Besides, I'm not the one making incongruous similarities between political leaning and content.

too late, you already did

[HAL 9000 96]

Yeah so back to simple, 1:1, logic, Hamburg... makes me want to have a hamburger soon.

figures, won't say a thing about another clinton legacy showing up.

go to sleep, i'm not expecting any criticism of the obama camp from you.

Not of this particular topic, since your hardon comes from this woman being a Clintonite. Ohhhhh dirty. Time to insert sly, blue dress remark now, thereby bypassing the entire FDA in one swell Charlespost.

since you did that instead of me, can we call you a right winger now?

Only if I am you. Besides, I'm not the one making incongruous similarities between political leaning and content.

too late, you already did

Yeah... so again what does making assumptions about Clintonites and the FDA under Obama have with Charlesposts? Apparently, that all there is to you in this thread.

[Ban Hammer 13,355]

Yeah so back to simple, 1:1, logic, Hamburg... makes me want to have a hamburger soon.

figures, won't say a thing about another clinton legacy showing up.

go to sleep, i'm not expecting any criticism of the obama camp from you.

Not of this particular topic, since your hardon comes from this woman being a Clintonite. Ohhhhh dirty. Time to insert sly, blue dress remark now, thereby bypassing the entire FDA in one swell Charlespost.

since you did that instead of me, can we call you a right winger now?

Only if I am you. Besides, I'm not the one making incongruous similarities between political leaning and content.

too late, you already did

Yeah... so again what does making assumptions about Clintonites and the FDA under Obama have with Charlesposts? Apparently, that all there is to you in this thread.

kinda like you not having a thing to say about how change does not equal having more clinton coathangers in the mix?

[HAL 9000 96]

Yeah so back to simple, 1:1, logic, Hamburg... makes me want to have a hamburger soon.

figures, won't say a thing about another clinton legacy showing up.

go to sleep, i'm not expecting any criticism of the obama camp from you.

Not of this particular topic, since your hardon comes from this woman being a Clintonite. Ohhhhh dirty. Time to insert sly, blue dress remark now, thereby bypassing the entire FDA in one swell Charlespost.

since you did that instead of me, can we call you a right winger now?

Only if I am you. Besides, I'm not the one making incongruous similarities between political leaning and content.

too late, you already did

Yeah... so again what does making assumptions about Clintonites and the FDA under Obama have with Charlesposts? Apparently, that all there is to you in this thread.

kinda like you not having a thing to say about how change does not equal having more clinton coathangers in the mix?

yawn again.

A more qualified answer is in post #3.

[Ban Hammer 13,355]

yawn again.

A more qualified answer is in post #3.

straphanging onto other posters now? like there isn't anyone else qualified better than a clintonite?

[HAL 9000 96]

yawn again.

A more qualified answer is in post #3.

straphanging onto other posters now? like there isn't anyone else qualified better than a clintonite?

Get over it. You have nothing to add but to whine about Clinton-era policy, heck... even in the FDA... man Charles... just try to relax on this a little bit. What is it specifically about this woman's qualifications that irks you in relation to Obama naming her? Beyond your broken record-change mantra that only you and a select few other broken records are babbling over and over and over...

Why don't I criticize? Because unless you have something informative about Margaret Hamburg that makes her an inappropriate choice to lead the FDA, then you are not really saying anything beyond a 4th grade-level whine.

[Ban Hammer 13,355]

yawn again.

A more qualified answer is in post #3.

straphanging onto other posters now? like there isn't anyone else qualified better than a clintonite?

Get over it. You have nothing to add but to whine about Clinton-era policy, heck... even in the FDA... man Charles... just try to relax on this a little bit. What is it specifically about this woman's qualifications that irks you in relation to Obama naming her? Beyond your broken record-change mantra that only you and a select few other broken records are babbling over and over and over...

Why don't I criticize? Because unless you have something informative about Margaret Hamburg that makes her an inappropriate choice to lead the FDA, then you are not really saying anything beyond a 4th grade-level whine.

i'm just pointing out that there's probably people to select. why are we having to dip back into the clinton pool?

oh never mind, you never give a decent answer anyways.

[HAL 9000 96]

yawn again.

A more qualified answer is in post #3.

straphanging onto other posters now? like there isn't anyone else qualified better than a clintonite?

Get over it. You have nothing to add but to whine about Clinton-era policy, heck... even in the FDA... man Charles... just try to relax on this a little bit. What is it specifically about this woman's qualifications that irks you in relation to Obama naming her? Beyond your broken record-change mantra that only you and a select few other broken records are babbling over and over and over...

Why don't I criticize? Because unless you have something informative about Margaret Hamburg that makes her an inappropriate choice to lead the FDA, then you are not really saying anything beyond a 4th grade-level whine.

i'm just pointing out that there's probably people to select. why are we having to dip back into the clinton pool?

oh never mind, you never give a decent answer anyways.

yeah I guess being qualified isn't qualified enough in your opinion.

Seriously Charles... if you're so knowledgeable about potential FDA candidates, do tell. Otherwise...

VJsheez...

[Ban Hammer 13,355]

yawn again.

A more qualified answer is in post #3.

straphanging onto other posters now? like there isn't anyone else qualified better than a clintonite?

Get over it. You have nothing to add but to whine about Clinton-era policy, heck... even in the FDA... man Charles... just try to relax on this a little bit. What is it specifically about this woman's qualifications that irks you in relation to Obama naming her? Beyond your broken record-change mantra that only you and a select few other broken records are babbling over and over and over...

Why don't I criticize? Because unless you have something informative about Margaret Hamburg that makes her an inappropriate choice to lead the FDA, then you are not really saying anything beyond a 4th grade-level whine.

i'm just pointing out that there's probably people to select. why are we having to dip back into the clinton pool?

oh never mind, you never give a decent answer anyways.

yeah I guess being qualified isn't qualified enough in your opinion.

Seriously Charles... if you're so knowledgeable about potential FDA candidates, do tell. Otherwise...

VJsheez...

apparently you're missing the entire point. never mind, stick your head back in the sand.

[I'm Gone 60]

another clintonite......no surprise there.

Someone actually qualified to do the job....no surprise there.

"Though less experienced as a regulator" Really?

[HAL 9000 96]

yawn again.

A more qualified answer is in post #3.

straphanging onto other posters now? like there isn't anyone else qualified better than a clintonite?

Get over it. You have nothing to add but to whine about Clinton-era policy, heck... even in the FDA... man Charles... just try to relax on this a little bit. What is it specifically about this woman's qualifications that irks you in relation to Obama naming her? Beyond your broken record-change mantra that only you and a select few other broken records are babbling over and over and over...

Why don't I criticize? Because unless you have something informative about Margaret Hamburg that makes her an inappropriate choice to lead the FDA, then you are not really saying anything beyond a 4th grade-level whine.

i'm just pointing out that there's probably people to select. why are we having to dip back into the clinton pool?

oh never mind, you never give a decent answer anyways.

yeah I guess being qualified isn't qualified enough in your opinion.

Seriously Charles... if you're so knowledgeable about potential FDA candidates, do tell. Otherwise...

VJsheez...

apparently you're missing the entire point. never mind, stick your head back in the sand.

Your point in red above?

Fair enough. You don't think that enough research has gone into the selection process? Again... any new information to add or are you going to continue skipping stones over the pond?

[Ban Hammer 13,355]

yawn again.

A more qualified answer is in post #3.

straphanging onto other posters now? like there isn't anyone else qualified better than a clintonite?

Get over it. You have nothing to add but to whine about Clinton-era policy, heck... even in the FDA... man Charles... just try to relax on this a little bit. What is it specifically about this woman's qualifications that irks you in relation to Obama naming her? Beyond your broken record-change mantra that only you and a select few other broken records are babbling over and over and over...

Why don't I criticize? Because unless you have something informative about Margaret Hamburg that makes her an inappropriate choice to lead the FDA, then you are not really saying anything beyond a 4th grade-level whine.

i'm just pointing out that there's probably people to select. why are we having to dip back into the clinton pool?

oh never mind, you never give a decent answer anyways.

yeah I guess being qualified isn't qualified enough in your opinion.

Seriously Charles... if you're so knowledgeable about potential FDA candidates, do tell. Otherwise...

VJsheez...

apparently you're missing the entire point. never mind, stick your head back in the sand.

Your point in red above?

Fair enough. You don't think that enough research has gone into the selection process? Again... any new information to add or are you going to continue skipping stones over the pond?

so i left out the word "better" while typing furiously. you missed it on your first reply