Jump to content

68 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: AOS (pnd) Country: Iran
Timeline
Posted

Well I think it was a good question and the answers here are all based on conjecture of course. Mentioning someone's country is not an insult against that person personally, as it seems some are taking it. In my husband's case, he tried for a student visa to the U.S. and was told no way by the visa officer at the embassy (this was before we married and filed a petition). She told him he came from a country that was causing the U.S. too much trouble and there was no way she was going to give him a visa. So if you think that they don't have prejudice against certain countries while looking at your petition, think again.

Pandora and Hesam

K-3 Visa

Service Center : Vermont Service Center

Consulate : Montreal, Canada

Marriage : 2008-08-29 in Canada

I-130 Sent : 2008-10-14

I-130 NOA1 : 2008-10-20

I-130F NOA2 : 2009-05-04

I-129F Sent : 2008-11-25

I-129F NOA1 : 2008-11-28

I-129F NOA2 : 2009-05-04

NVC Received : 2009-05-12

Packet 3 Received : 2009-05-19

Packet 3 Sent : 2009-06-10

Interview: 2009-09-10 APPROVED

See my interview experience here: http://www.visajourney.com/forums/index.ph...=217544&hl=

Visa Received : 2009-09-16

US Entry : 2009-09-27

EAD received: 2009-12-21

AOS interview: 2010-02-05 (medical exam missing from documents)

Recieved RFE for missing medical exam that they lost. Submitted new exam March 10, 2010.

Notified that he is in background checks after submitting three service requests: July, 2010

  • Replies 67
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Egypt
Timeline
Posted

Gimme a freakin' break!

Would Thailand be considered high fraud as well? I just presumed it is, being similar to Vietnam, Philippines, etc.

Asia - they would be looking for red flags...

the scenario wd change pretty soon . I agree to Pushbrk. Soon americans wd immegrate to countries like India as because cheap goog lifestyle with lesser hassle. Then the game will be other way around. The 3rd world concept is about to change and 3rd worlds will no more be 3rd worlds. The hierarchy is changing.

And Bobby_Umit pls stop confusing people by issuing names of countries which are/are not considered fraud. You & me are no USCIS ...so we are in no charge of issuing country names and posting bad reputation in their names. Pls there has been no official list that has been issued. So pls i think VJ shd refrain from confusing people. All people with correct intentions and honesty and bonafide relation & marriage will of course pass. Thanks

The Next Step is Removing Conditions!

0820120349b40a7377e80.jpg

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ukraine
Timeline
Posted
romania is not considered low risk. i know 2 cute little romanian waitresses here in my little town in south central PA that arrived K1, ditched their intended without marriage, stayed illegal, popped out anchors, and are looking for someone to legitimise their overstay (impossible). if you're interested i can save you the bux and introduce them. they're both attractive ...

seriously, if you two write a bunch of e-mails and take a 1 week vacation together neither of you have any idea of what you are getting.

I seriously hope this wasn't a joke because it's a bad one. Besides...like people say...from any bush a rat can come out of it (meaning that fraud can happen anywhere).

Thanks for all the really good info that was put in this thread.

PEACE my friends........

A friend of mine (a Romanian) works at the US embassy in Bucharest. From what I have heard there is none of the nightmares people with fiancees from VietNam, Phillipines, etc. go through. I can also say that Kiev (former Soviet Union) is very easy to deal with and have heard the same from Moscow. So I am not sure how "high risk" they are considered, maybe less now than 10 years ago. At any rate, I would take my chances with a foreign woman any day. I consider it a lot less likely to get rip-off'ed than by the woman next door or at the local church for that matter.

VERMONT! I Reject Your Reality...and Substitute My Own!

Gary And Alla

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Thailand
Timeline
Posted
As for AP people have been mentioning - my fiance and I waited 51 or 52 days (the NVC thread people still can't decide which one it is ;)) to get out. Why? Nobody knows. No criminal records, no records at all, for that matter, pretty uncommon names, no previous marriages, etc. Not even the country I come from is considered high fraud, as pretty much no cases get through the Embassy on a monthly basis (maybe 1-2, if that many). Pretty much nobody ever finds out about reasons of their AP.

Yup. Like Badgerella and Kim, I'm another AP@NVC (still there....day 47). I also have never been given a reason for the extra attention lavished on our case. I did some stats a few weeks ago - they're posted on the NVC thread if you're interested. Anyway, upshot is that NVC does not appear to be picking on particular countries to hold back files for AP. The distribution of AP cases by country is roughly what you'd expect for the total distribution of VJ cases at large. Of course the sample space I used is only VJ K1/K3 cases where members filled in their timelines with NVC Received/NVC Left data. So that is not necessarily scientifically accurate. BTW - the AP distribution by CSC/VSC also mirrors the general population (about 60/40 split).

All this to say- NVC doesn't seem to predispose certain countries - High risk, MENA, etc. - for AP that a naive guess might think it would. You're as likely to get AP at NVC from Canada as from Cameroon.

However, AP @ consulate almost certainly does single out the high-risk and Mideast countries that common knowledge (and frankly, common sense) tell us fall under extra scrutiny.

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Jamaica
Timeline
Posted
It's just a matter of time till some of those erstwhile 3rd world countries start considering American visa applicants to their territories as "high risk" for fraud.

You never know. I was very surprised during one of my trips to Jamaica... the lady at immigration wanted to see proof that I had a return flight. I wondered if Jamaica really has problems with Americans illegally immigrating there.

November 19, 2007 - Met

November 25, 2008 - Engaged

November 25, 2009 - Married

November 24, 2011 - Baby due!

Daily earning Amazon gift cards by searching the web with SwagBucks!

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Lebanon
Timeline
Posted

Does anybody know anything about Lebanon? My fiance is a Christian (as is half the country). Do you think the adjudicator knows that fact? Would it help? (and by no means am I implying anything about any other religions...)

01/21/10 - AOS Approved

01/19/10 - EAD Card Received

01/16/10 - AP received

11/18/09 - AOS - NOA1

10/30/09 - Civil Marriage

10/24/09 - Entry/I-94 start

09/04/09 - K1 issued

07/15/09 - K1 - NOA2

02/27/09 - K1 - NOA1

02/24/09 - Filed I-129F

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Posted
All people with correct intentions and honesty and bonafide relation & marriage will of course pass.
This cannot be said with ANY truth, accuracy, or authority.

An immigration attorney & ex-consul answered my "what is a high-fraud country" question with "any poor country."

Ecuador is not known as a high-fraud country, but the Section Chief of the Immigrant Visa Unit was pulled from his cushy job with the OAS in Washington and assigned to yet another consular post. His specialty is anti-human-trafficking (he has lectured on this all over the world). Therefore, any interviewees in Guayaquil should beware this focus. I should add here, in case anyone has missed it elsewhere, that the U.S. citizen must attend the first interview (K-1, K-3, CR-1) or the visa will be delayed interminably or outright refused. There are no exceptions, even if you (the USC) are on your deathbed. And, should you ask the consulate if you need to attend, the consulate will not answer your question or will lie to you.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Croatia
Timeline
Posted
All people with correct intentions and honesty and bonafide relation & marriage will of course pass.
This cannot be said with ANY truth, accuracy, or authority.

I'll have to second this. A bona fide relationship/marriage is really a plus, but the whole thing is still in the eyes of a CO. And they can see whatever pleases them. Or whatever they wish to see.

I-129F Sent: Aug 20th 2008

Interview Date: April 8th 2009, 10:30 - APPROVED!

K-1 Visa Received: April 9th 2009

POE: Aug 8th 2009, Minneapolis

Wedding: Aug 28th 2009

-------------------------------------------------------------------

Our I-129f was approved in 107 days from our NOA1 date.

Our I-129f was approved in 114 days from our filing date.

Our case spent 52 days being chewed by NVC.

Our interview took 224 days from your I-129F NOA1 date.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

AOS, AP, EAD filed: Oct 15th 2009

Biometrics: Nov 24th 2009

AP received: Dec 14th 2009

EAD received: Dec 17th 2009

Green Card received: Dec 18th 2009

-------------------------------------------------------------------

http://www.badgerella.com/forum

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Croatia
Timeline
Posted
All people with correct intentions and honesty and bonafide relation & marriage will of course pass.
This cannot be said with ANY truth, accuracy, or authority.

I'll have to second this. A bona fide relationship/marriage is really a plus, but the whole thing is still in the eyes of a CO. And they can see whatever pleases them. Or whatever they wish to see.

I-129F Sent: Aug 20th 2008

Interview Date: April 8th 2009, 10:30 - APPROVED!

K-1 Visa Received: April 9th 2009

POE: Aug 8th 2009, Minneapolis

Wedding: Aug 28th 2009

-------------------------------------------------------------------

Our I-129f was approved in 107 days from our NOA1 date.

Our I-129f was approved in 114 days from our filing date.

Our case spent 52 days being chewed by NVC.

Our interview took 224 days from your I-129F NOA1 date.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

AOS, AP, EAD filed: Oct 15th 2009

Biometrics: Nov 24th 2009

AP received: Dec 14th 2009

EAD received: Dec 17th 2009

Green Card received: Dec 18th 2009

-------------------------------------------------------------------

http://www.badgerella.com/forum

  • 1 year later...
Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Nigeria
Timeline
Posted

It is probably a mid fraud consulate. But there are also aware that level of difficulty and look out for people from high fraud consulates trying to sneak through lower fraud consulates. You can expect a slightly higher than normal harassment level if you are in this class ( even if your case is perfectly legit )

This will not be over quickly. You will not enjoy this.

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Philippines
Timeline
Posted

It is probably a mid fraud consulate. But there are also aware that level of difficulty and look out for people from high fraud consulates trying to sneak through lower fraud consulates. You can expect a slightly higher than normal harassment level if you are in this class ( even if your case is perfectly legit )

Well we met in the middle of her work contract so I don't think them being able to say we're sneaking will be an issue. She was already there for a few months before I even met her.

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Sudan
Timeline
Posted

I wish I knew more about Sudan. What's on VJ doesn't apply anymore as back then the Embassy was barebones and eventually shutdown. They opened a new embassy with a full staff last year so it's going to be totally different.

The worst I have to worry about is the people there being Sudanese, it means I'll have to call them 3 times a day to get them to do anything and harass them :rofl:

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...