Rooting For the President to Fail

[Sofiyya 1,687]

Still evading and inaccurately representing the truth I see.

No, I have not stated I agree with the bill or any of its parts have I? Of course, I could be a little more specific and quite others' opinions about its specifics... which is lots more than you have done. Still waiting for you and your details though.

Give us details to discuss or don't play.

You are unaware of how transparent you are. Between us, you are the only one playing. Wait all you want. I owe you nothing, and you have offered to me, the same.

Obamalover!!

407 pages... plenty of details to choose.

Choose.

Oh, but you can't . . .

[HAL 9000 96]

Still evading and inaccurately representing the truth I see.

No, I have not stated I agree with the bill or any of its parts have I? Of course, I could be a little more specific and quite others' opinions about its specifics... which is lots more than you have done. Still waiting for you and your details though.

Give us details to discuss or don't play.

You are unaware of how transparent you are. Between us, you are the only one playing. Wait all you want. I owe you nothing, and you have offered to me, the same.

That's right, VW. You don't owe me anything. You owe enough to yourself to substantiate the claims you make... and that's something only you can solve for yourself.

Teach... Oh wait... you won't. Which makes you have even less credibility.

[Sofiyya 1,687]

Still evading and inaccurately representing the truth I see.

No, I have not stated I agree with the bill or any of its parts have I? Of course, I could be a little more specific and quite others' opinions about its specifics... which is lots more than you have done. Still waiting for you and your details though.

Give us details to discuss or don't play.

You are unaware of how transparent you are. Between us, you are the only one playing. Wait all you want. I owe you nothing, and you have offered to me, the same.

That's right, VW. You don't owe me anything. You owe enough to yourself to substantiate the claims you make... and that's something only you can solve for yourself.

I'm quite satisfied with the claims I make, so, problem solved.

[spookyturtle 9,466]

Beware now... you of all people are now marked as an Obamalover.

That is hysterical. I may not have been an Obama supporter, but I'm a big boy and I'm not going to join the crybaby, sky is falling group of retards here. He is the man for the next four years and he has my full respect and support unless he fvcks things up. I won't cry about things that haven't happened or pretend that I am more qualified to run the country than he is. I guess the real political genius lies here, on VJ off topic. I wonder why Obama didn't appoint anyone from here?

[Sofiyya 1,687]

Still evading and inaccurately representing the truth I see.

No, I have not stated I agree with the bill or any of its parts have I? Of course, I could be a little more specific and quite others' opinions about its specifics... which is lots more than you have done. Still waiting for you and your details though.

Give us details to discuss or don't play.

You are unaware of how transparent you are. Between us, you are the only one playing. Wait all you want. I owe you nothing, and you have offered to me, the same.

That's right, VW. You don't owe me anything. You owe enough to yourself to substantiate the claims you make... and that's something only you can solve for yourself.

Teach... Oh wait... you won't. Which makes you have even less credibility.

When I teach, I expect my students to be prepared to learn. You'd fail.

[HAL 9000 96]

Still evading and inaccurately representing the truth I see.

No, I have not stated I agree with the bill or any of its parts have I? Of course, I could be a little more specific and quite others' opinions about its specifics... which is lots more than you have done. Still waiting for you and your details though.

Give us details to discuss or don't play.

You are unaware of how transparent you are. Between us, you are the only one playing. Wait all you want. I owe you nothing, and you have offered to me, the same.

That's right, VW. You don't owe me anything. You owe enough to yourself to substantiate the claims you make... and that's something only you can solve for yourself.

I'm quite satisfied with the claims I make, so, problem solved.

Which makes you all the rage in your head.

[Sofiyya 1,687]

Beware now... you of all people are now marked as an Obamalover.

That is hysterical. I may not have been an Obama supporter, but I'm a big boy and I'm not going to join the crybaby, sky is falling group of retards here. He is the man for the next four years and he has my full respect and support unless he fvcks things up. I won't cry about things that haven't happened or pretend that I am more qualified to run the country than he is. I guess the real political genius lies here, on VJ off topic. I wonder why Obama didn't appoint anyone from here?

How do you know he didn't?

[spookyturtle 9,466]

I don't know... even some naysayers can back their claims they make based on some substance. Even when given the substance in an easy link to a 407-page document that they claim to have read and objected to in specific parts as destructive to this nation. All it seems to me is a lot of hogwash, but you knew that already.

I mean the ones that say Obama's policy will fail and it hasn't even been enacted yet. The one's who spew nothing but doom and gloom and negativity. The usual few who are anti everything. Disagreement is fine. And healthy. It keeps things in check. That's not what I'm talking about. I mean the idiots.

I doubt anyone has digested the entire 407 pages, including Congress and the Senate. They pick their bones as they see fit.

I am crushed and saddened by the whinefest (not, lol). Perhaps if I was also paid to opine, then I'd spend more time giving specific, line by line analysis of policy that was literally legislated not even two weeks ago.

The whinefest would be fine too, but to date there is nothing to whine about. It may be coming, but it hasn't happened yet. And heaven forbid that the stimulus and some of the other changes actually help. I guess it is much better to sit on your a$$ and bitc h about what might happen instead of trying to make things work. And of course everything is a lie and propaganda and all.

I'm curious. Do you lack the ability to take data and anticipate the results? Oh, but you haven't read the bill, so you have no data to use to draw any conclusions. You're just waiting around to see what happens. That's a great plan, if you're a follower who sits on your a$$ waiting to see what might happen rather than a thinker who can be proactive. Of course, anything Obama likes, you accept as gospel. Remind me not to take investment advice from you.

I wouldn't give you advice. You know everything.

[Sofiyya 1,687]

Still evading and inaccurately representing the truth I see.

No, I have not stated I agree with the bill or any of its parts have I? Of course, I could be a little more specific and quite others' opinions about its specifics... which is lots more than you have done. Still waiting for you and your details though.

Give us details to discuss or don't play.

You are unaware of how transparent you are. Between us, you are the only one playing. Wait all you want. I owe you nothing, and you have offered to me, the same.

That's right, VW. You don't owe me anything. You owe enough to yourself to substantiate the claims you make... and that's something only you can solve for yourself.

I'm quite satisfied with the claims I make, so, problem solved.

Which makes you all the rage in your head.

Something we have in common, apparently.

I don't know... even some naysayers can back their claims they make based on some substance. Even when given the substance in an easy link to a 407-page document that they claim to have read and objected to in specific parts as destructive to this nation. All it seems to me is a lot of hogwash, but you knew that already.

I mean the ones that say Obama's policy will fail and it hasn't even been enacted yet. The one's who spew nothing but doom and gloom and negativity. The usual few who are anti everything. Disagreement is fine. And healthy. It keeps things in check. That's not what I'm talking about. I mean the idiots.

I doubt anyone has digested the entire 407 pages, including Congress and the Senate. They pick their bones as they see fit.

I am crushed and saddened by the whinefest (not, lol). Perhaps if I was also paid to opine, then I'd spend more time giving specific, line by line analysis of policy that was literally legislated not even two weeks ago.

The whinefest would be fine too, but to date there is nothing to whine about. It may be coming, but it hasn't happened yet. And heaven forbid that the stimulus and some of the other changes actually help. I guess it is much better to sit on your a$$ and bitc h about what might happen instead of trying to make things work. And of course everything is a lie and propaganda and all.

I'm curious. Do you lack the ability to take data and anticipate the results? Oh, but you haven't read the bill, so you have no data to use to draw any conclusions. You're just waiting around to see what happens. That's a great plan, if you're a follower who sits on your a$$ waiting to see what might happen rather than a thinker who can be proactive. Of course, anything Obama likes, you accept as gospel. Remind me not to take investment advice from you.

I wouldn't give you advice. You know everything.

[HAL 9000 96]

Still evading and inaccurately representing the truth I see.

No, I have not stated I agree with the bill or any of its parts have I? Of course, I could be a little more specific and quite others' opinions about its specifics... which is lots more than you have done. Still waiting for you and your details though.

Give us details to discuss or don't play.

You are unaware of how transparent you are. Between us, you are the only one playing. Wait all you want. I owe you nothing, and you have offered to me, the same.

That's right, VW. You don't owe me anything. You owe enough to yourself to substantiate the claims you make... and that's something only you can solve for yourself.

Teach... Oh wait... you won't. Which makes you have even less credibility.

When I teach, I expect my students to be prepared to learn. You'd fail.

Well... at least give your students a syllabus.

And assuming you teach a course, which means your students are taking notes, not teaching you about your field of expertise. Which in X # of posts here from you, equals nothing since you still haven't mentioned the first thing about any single point within that bill you say you read.

Oh boy...

[spookyturtle 9,466]

[i'm curious. Do you lack the ability to take data and anticipate the results? Oh, but you haven't read the bill, so you have no data to use to draw any conclusions. You're just waiting around to see what happens. That's a great plan, if you're a follower who sits on your a$$ waiting to see what might happen rather than a thinker who can be proactive. Of course, anything Obama likes, you accept as gospel. Remind me not to take investment advice from you.

Do you do anything but breed negativity? Are you so immature that you are still crying about your loss in November? Good thing you're not waiting around to see what happens. You're here, arguing on the internet. Fvcking brilliant.

And modest too.

[HAL 9000 96]

But what argument would that be?

I still haven't seen one single bit of substance to argue over other than the probability that she read the bill is likely close to 0 with a two tailed p-value of close to 0.01.

[Sofiyya 1,687]

Still evading and inaccurately representing the truth I see.

No, I have not stated I agree with the bill or any of its parts have I? Of course, I could be a little more specific and quite others' opinions about its specifics... which is lots more than you have done. Still waiting for you and your details though.

Give us details to discuss or don't play.

You are unaware of how transparent you are. Between us, you are the only one playing. Wait all you want. I owe you nothing, and you have offered to me, the same.

That's right, VW. You don't owe me anything. You owe enough to yourself to substantiate the claims you make... and that's something only you can solve for yourself.

Teach... Oh wait... you won't. Which makes you have even less credibility.

When I teach, I expect my students to be prepared to learn. You'd fail.

Well... at least give your students a syllabus.

And assuming you teach a course, which means your students are taking notes, not teaching you about your field of expertise. Which in X # of posts here from you, equals nothing since you still haven't mentioned the first thing about any single point within that bill you say you read.

Oh boy...

I know when something is for amusement and when it needs to be addressed seriously. This thread isn't serious, and neither are you. If you were willing to read the bill and form an opinion based on substance, I would be willing to take the time to discuss it with you. Since you won't bother, I won't bother. Logical minds understand that.

Edited March 2, 2009 by Virtual wife

[HAL 9000 96]

Still evading and inaccurately representing the truth I see.

No, I have not stated I agree with the bill or any of its parts have I? Of course, I could be a little more specific and quite others' opinions about its specifics... which is lots more than you have done. Still waiting for you and your details though.

Give us details to discuss or don't play.

You are unaware of how transparent you are. Between us, you are the only one playing. Wait all you want. I owe you nothing, and you have offered to me, the same.

That's right, VW. You don't owe me anything. You owe enough to yourself to substantiate the claims you make... and that's something only you can solve for yourself.

Teach... Oh wait... you won't. Which makes you have even less credibility.

When I teach, I expect my students to be prepared to learn. You'd fail.

Well... at least give your students a syllabus.

And assuming you teach a course, which means your students are taking notes, not teaching you about your field of expertise. Which in X # of posts here from you, equals nothing since you still haven't mentioned the first thing about any single point within that bill you say you read.

Oh boy...

I know when something is for amusement and when it needs to be addressed seriously. This thread isn't serious, and neither are you. If ou were willing to read the bill and form an opinion based on substance, I would be willing to take the time to discuss it with you. Since you won't bother, I won't bother. Logical minds understand that.

Well I am sure that in the time we've wasted here I could have read a couple of bullet points within the legislation that you apparently have refused to discuss (or point me to so we can have an efficient discussion). Of course, logical minds could also deduce that you lied about having read the bill. Which is much more probable than this or any other thread in an immigration website being anything serious.

Or... you could just tell us about a couple of specific points within the bill and get over yourself.

Not gonna happen is it?

[Sofiyya 1,687]

[i'm curious. Do you lack the ability to take data and anticipate the results? Oh, but you haven't read the bill, so you have no data to use to draw any conclusions. You're just waiting around to see what happens. That's a great plan, if you're a follower who sits on your a$$ waiting to see what might happen rather than a thinker who can be proactive. Of course, anything Obama likes, you accept as gospel. Remind me not to take investment advice from you.

Do you do anything but breed negativity? Are you so immature that you are still crying about your loss in November? Good thing you're not waiting around to see what happens. You're here, arguing on the internet. Fvcking brilliant.

And modest too.

I didn't lose anything in November. Life goes on, and mine is still good. Sometimes I go slummin'. Tonight, it just happens to be with you.