Rooting For the President to Fail

[HAL 9000 96]

looooooooooooooooooooool

spooky you slumdog millionaire!

[Sofiyya 1,687]

Still evading and inaccurately representing the truth I see.

No, I have not stated I agree with the bill or any of its parts have I? Of course, I could be a little more specific and quite others' opinions about its specifics... which is lots more than you have done. Still waiting for you and your details though.

Give us details to discuss or don't play.

You are unaware of how transparent you are. Between us, you are the only one playing. Wait all you want. I owe you nothing, and you have offered to me, the same.

That's right, VW. You don't owe me anything. You owe enough to yourself to substantiate the claims you make... and that's something only you can solve for yourself.

Teach... Oh wait... you won't. Which makes you have even less credibility.

When I teach, I expect my students to be prepared to learn. You'd fail.

Well... at least give your students a syllabus.

And assuming you teach a course, which means your students are taking notes, not teaching you about your field of expertise. Which in X # of posts here from you, equals nothing since you still haven't mentioned the first thing about any single point within that bill you say you read.

Oh boy...

I know when something is for amusement and when it needs to be addressed seriously. This thread isn't serious, and neither are you. If ou were willing to read the bill and form an opinion based on substance, I would be willing to take the time to discuss it with you. Since you won't bother, I won't bother. Logical minds understand that.

Well I am sure that in the time we've wasted here I could have read a couple of bullet points within the legislation that you apparently have refused to discuss (or point me to so we can have an efficient discussion). Of course, logical minds could also deduce that you lied about having read the bill. Which is much more probable than this or any other thread in an immigration website being anything serious.

Or... you could just tell us about a couple of specific points within the bill and get over yourself.

Not gonna happen is it?

You prefer to believe I haven't read the bill, so what? You admit you haven't read it, and you probably can't even imagine anyone else reading it, so it's easy to believe someone else hasn't. You made your demand that I lead you, I demanded that you lead yourself, then come discuss what you know. If that's too heavy for you, ok, I can accept that. Just don't try to disquise it as as something more than that.

[HAL 9000 96]

Still evading and inaccurately representing the truth I see.

No, I have not stated I agree with the bill or any of its parts have I? Of course, I could be a little more specific and quite others' opinions about its specifics... which is lots more than you have done. Still waiting for you and your details though.

Give us details to discuss or don't play.

You are unaware of how transparent you are. Between us, you are the only one playing. Wait all you want. I owe you nothing, and you have offered to me, the same.

That's right, VW. You don't owe me anything. You owe enough to yourself to substantiate the claims you make... and that's something only you can solve for yourself.

Teach... Oh wait... you won't. Which makes you have even less credibility.

When I teach, I expect my students to be prepared to learn. You'd fail.

Well... at least give your students a syllabus.

And assuming you teach a course, which means your students are taking notes, not teaching you about your field of expertise. Which in X # of posts here from you, equals nothing since you still haven't mentioned the first thing about any single point within that bill you say you read.

Oh boy...

I know when something is for amusement and when it needs to be addressed seriously. This thread isn't serious, and neither are you. If ou were willing to read the bill and form an opinion based on substance, I would be willing to take the time to discuss it with you. Since you won't bother, I won't bother. Logical minds understand that.

Well I am sure that in the time we've wasted here I could have read a couple of bullet points within the legislation that you apparently have refused to discuss (or point me to so we can have an efficient discussion). Of course, logical minds could also deduce that you lied about having read the bill. Which is much more probable than this or any other thread in an immigration website being anything serious.

Or... you could just tell us about a couple of specific points within the bill and get over yourself.

Not gonna happen is it?

You prefer to believe I haven't read the bill, so what? You admit you haven't read it, and you probably can't even imagine anyone else reading it, so it's easy to believe someone else hasn't. You made your demand that I lead you, I demanded that you lead yourself, then come discuss what you know. If that's too heavy for you, ok, I can accept that. Just don't try to disquise it as as something more than that.

The pdf is 14.3 megabytes and is available readily like I provided before you started your most recent show of evasiveness.

I'm not asking for leadership. I'm asking you to provide substance so we can discuss point to point. You pick the topics since you are the all-wise and powerful teacher. What could you be fearful of? Oh right... not having read the bill.

And notice the conditional language I use.

[spookyturtle 9,466]

I didn't lose anything in November. Life goes on, and mine is still good. Sometimes I go slummin'. Tonight, it just happens to be with you.

Loser huh?

looooooooooooooooooooool

spooky you slumdog millionaire!

You prefer to believe I haven't read the bill, so what? You admit you haven't read it, and you probably can't even imagine anyone else reading it, so it's easy to believe someone else hasn't. You made your demand that I lead you, I demanded that you lead yourself, then come discuss what you know. If that's too heavy for you, ok, I can accept that. Just don't try to disquise it as as something more than that.

Are you arrogant in reality too, or just here?

[Sofiyya 1,687]

Still evading and inaccurately representing the truth I see.

No, I have not stated I agree with the bill or any of its parts have I? Of course, I could be a little more specific and quite others' opinions about its specifics... which is lots more than you have done. Still waiting for you and your details though.

Give us details to discuss or don't play.

You are unaware of how transparent you are. Between us, you are the only one playing. Wait all you want. I owe you nothing, and you have offered to me, the same.

That's right, VW. You don't owe me anything. You owe enough to yourself to substantiate the claims you make... and that's something only you can solve for yourself.

Teach... Oh wait... you won't. Which makes you have even less credibility.

When I teach, I expect my students to be prepared to learn. You'd fail.

Well... at least give your students a syllabus.

And assuming you teach a course, which means your students are taking notes, not teaching you about your field of expertise. Which in X # of posts here from you, equals nothing since you still haven't mentioned the first thing about any single point within that bill you say you read.

Oh boy...

I know when something is for amusement and when it needs to be addressed seriously. This thread isn't serious, and neither are you. If ou were willing to read the bill and form an opinion based on substance, I would be willing to take the time to discuss it with you. Since you won't bother, I won't bother. Logical minds understand that.

Well I am sure that in the time we've wasted here I could have read a couple of bullet points within the legislation that you apparently have refused to discuss (or point me to so we can have an efficient discussion). Of course, logical minds could also deduce that you lied about having read the bill. Which is much more probable than this or any other thread in an immigration website being anything serious.

Or... you could just tell us about a couple of specific points within the bill and get over yourself.

Not gonna happen is it?

You prefer to believe I haven't read the bill, so what? You admit you haven't read it, and you probably can't even imagine anyone else reading it, so it's easy to believe someone else hasn't. You made your demand that I lead you, I demanded that you lead yourself, then come discuss what you know. If that's too heavy for you, ok, I can accept that. Just don't try to disquise it as as something more than that.

The pdf is 14.3 megabytes and is available readily like I provided before you started your most recent show of evasiveness.

I'm not asking for leadership. I'm asking you to provide substance so we can discuss point to point. You pick the topics since you are the all-wise and powerful teacher. What could you be fearful of? Oh right... not having read the bill.

And notice the conditional language I use.

Then, read it and get some substance of your own. Damn libs, always asking for handouts

[HAL 9000 96]

On the internet I am a HAL 9000 AI. In reality I fail courses when the professor doesn't give a syllabus, make assignments, give lectures, or otherwise discuss course-related material. I guess that professor gets fired then.

[spookyturtle 9,466]

Then, read it and get some substance of your own. Damn libs, always asking for handouts

When you were a kid, did you take your ball and go home so the other kids couldn't play?

[Sofiyya 1,687]

I didn't lose anything in November. Life goes on, and mine is still good. Sometimes I go slummin'. Tonight, it just happens to be with you.

Loser huh?

looooooooooooooooooooool

spooky you slumdog millionaire!

You prefer to believe I haven't read the bill, so what? You admit you haven't read it, and you probably can't even imagine anyone else reading it, so it's easy to believe someone else hasn't. You made your demand that I lead you, I demanded that you lead yourself, then come discuss what you know. If that's too heavy for you, ok, I can accept that. Just don't try to disquise it as as something more than that.

Are you arrogant in reality too, or just here?

Arrogance is subjective.

[HAL 9000 96]

Still evading and inaccurately representing the truth I see.

No, I have not stated I agree with the bill or any of its parts have I? Of course, I could be a little more specific and quite others' opinions about its specifics... which is lots more than you have done. Still waiting for you and your details though.

Give us details to discuss or don't play.

You are unaware of how transparent you are. Between us, you are the only one playing. Wait all you want. I owe you nothing, and you have offered to me, the same.

That's right, VW. You don't owe me anything. You owe enough to yourself to substantiate the claims you make... and that's something only you can solve for yourself.

Teach... Oh wait... you won't. Which makes you have even less credibility.

When I teach, I expect my students to be prepared to learn. You'd fail.

Well... at least give your students a syllabus.

And assuming you teach a course, which means your students are taking notes, not teaching you about your field of expertise. Which in X # of posts here from you, equals nothing since you still haven't mentioned the first thing about any single point within that bill you say you read.

Oh boy...

I know when something is for amusement and when it needs to be addressed seriously. This thread isn't serious, and neither are you. If ou were willing to read the bill and form an opinion based on substance, I would be willing to take the time to discuss it with you. Since you won't bother, I won't bother. Logical minds understand that.

Well I am sure that in the time we've wasted here I could have read a couple of bullet points within the legislation that you apparently have refused to discuss (or point me to so we can have an efficient discussion). Of course, logical minds could also deduce that you lied about having read the bill. Which is much more probable than this or any other thread in an immigration website being anything serious.

Or... you could just tell us about a couple of specific points within the bill and get over yourself.

Not gonna happen is it?

You prefer to believe I haven't read the bill, so what? You admit you haven't read it, and you probably can't even imagine anyone else reading it, so it's easy to believe someone else hasn't. You made your demand that I lead you, I demanded that you lead yourself, then come discuss what you know. If that's too heavy for you, ok, I can accept that. Just don't try to disquise it as as something more than that.

The pdf is 14.3 megabytes and is available readily like I provided before you started your most recent show of evasiveness.

I'm not asking for leadership. I'm asking you to provide substance so we can discuss point to point. You pick the topics since you are the all-wise and powerful teacher. What could you be fearful of? Oh right... not having read the bill.

And notice the conditional language I use.

Then, read it and get some substance of your own. Damn libs, always asking for handouts

Irrelevant, retarded, and off the mark. 407 pages. Take your pick.

[Sofiyya 1,687]

Then, read it and get some substance of your own. Damn libs, always asking for handouts

When you were a kid, did you take your ball and go home so the other kids couldn't play?

[spookyturtle 9,466]

Arrogance is subjective.

Very true, that's why I ask.

[HAL 9000 96]

Still waiting.

[Sofiyya 1,687]

Still waiting.

Enjoy!

[HAL 9000 96]

Still waiting.

Enjoy!

No kidding.

Want the last post or something?

[Sofiyya 1,687]

Still waiting.

Enjoy!

No kidding.

Want the last post or something?

Nope, you can have it.