31 K1s on VJ / 3 K3 approved this week

[Frenchwife 1]

They can approve fast

31 K1 approved this week

See

http://cse.ssl.berkeley.edu/igor/vjdata/vsc.aspx

(thanks a lot to the person mantaining it!)

But only 3 K3s

They have bigger backlog on K1

about 330 in the list till early december NOA1 while about 130 for K3

Still could they put more priority on K3?

please!!!

Edited February 26, 2009 by Frenchwife

[Y's_habibitk 2]

the l.i.f.e act is dead at vsc. so much for "fast reunification of family"

[GS4EVER 0]

I want fast unification with my hubby!! Lisa, I don't know how you manage to do it and stay so strong after waiting close to 230 days for approval and another 50 for AP! Kudos to you

[Y's_habibitk 2]

I want fast unification with my hubby!! Lisa, I don't know how you manage to do it and stay so strong after waiting close to 230 days for approval and another 50 for AP! Kudos to you

i have good days and bad,

[cjgator 2]

Hey Lisa.

After 6 1/2 weeks, they finally got the packet info straightened out, and sent to the right embassy. Natasha's interview is next Wednesday (3/4). Ironic. Our one-year wedding anniversary is 3/1. She should have been home by now.

Big mix of excitement & bitterness going on. Happy to be here, but am completely disgusted at what it took to get here.

NOTE: For anyone who reads this, and wants to tell me that I should just be grateful to be at this point, and our government owes us nothing, keep your comments to yourself. Unless you know my story, don't even start.

I'll write back on Wed. & let you know how it went. Send all of our friends my love. I hope you are hanging in there. Lots of love to ya.

CJ

I want fast unification with my hubby!! Lisa, I don't know how you manage to do it and stay so strong after waiting close to 230 days for approval and another 50 for AP! Kudos to you

i have good days and bad,

[Y's_habibitk 2]

Chris, its always good to see you

So good to hear that she finally has her interview scheduled!

I'll send some super duper mojo directed there on 3/4

Lisa

Hey Lisa.

After 6 1/2 weeks, they finally got the packet info straightened out, and sent to the right embassy. Natasha's interview is next Wednesday (3/4). Ironic. Our one-year wedding anniversary is 3/1. She should have been home by now.

Big mix of excitement & bitterness going on. Happy to be here, but am completely disgusted at what it took to get here.

NOTE: For anyone who reads this, and wants to tell me that I should just be grateful to be at this point, and our government owes us nothing, keep your comments to yourself. Unless you know my story, don't even start.

I'll write back on Wed. & let you know how it went. Send all of our friends my love. I hope you are hanging in there. Lots of love to ya.

CJ

I want fast unification with my hubby!! Lisa, I don't know how you manage to do it and stay so strong after waiting close to 230 days for approval and another 50 for AP! Kudos to you

i have good days and bad,

[pushbrk 13,105]

They can approve fast

31 K1 approved this week

See

http://cse.ssl.berkeley.edu/igor/vjdata/vsc.aspx

(thanks a lot to the person mantaining it!)

But only 3 K3s

They have bigger backlog on K1

about 330 in the list till early december NOA1 while about 130 for K3

Still could they put more priority on K3?

please!!!

This statistic is meaningless without knowing the number of pending K1 and K3 cases remaining. The number of K3 filings is far less than K1.

[cjgator 2]

Thanks baby. I hope you get out of AP soon. Big kiss.

Chris

Chris, its always good to see you

So good to hear that she finally has her interview scheduled!

I'll send some super duper mojo directed there on 3/4

Lisa

Hey Lisa.

After 6 1/2 weeks, they finally got the packet info straightened out, and sent to the right embassy. Natasha's interview is next Wednesday (3/4). Ironic. Our one-year wedding anniversary is 3/1. She should have been home by now.

Big mix of excitement & bitterness going on. Happy to be here, but am completely disgusted at what it took to get here.

NOTE: For anyone who reads this, and wants to tell me that I should just be grateful to be at this point, and our government owes us nothing, keep your comments to yourself. Unless you know my story, don't even start.

I'll write back on Wed. & let you know how it went. Send all of our friends my love. I hope you are hanging in there. Lots of love to ya.

CJ

I want fast unification with my hubby!! Lisa, I don't know how you manage to do it and stay so strong after waiting close to 230 days for approval and another 50 for AP! Kudos to you

i have good days and bad,

[Frenchwife 1]

hey guys

I see now they got 52 K1 while K3s were only 7

at this rate it is about 4 months for us

but guess what: they don't approve the oldest first!!!

[pushbrk 13,105]

hey guys

I see now they got 52 K1 while K3s were only 7

at this rate it is about 4 months for us

but guess what: they don't approve the oldest first!!!

I'm really not sure why this misconception is so widespread. They don't hold up anybody's approval so that approvals come in order of submission. Petition adjudication has multiple steps and there can be delays at any point. The best they can do is begin processing cases in the date order received. Where they come out the other end of the pipe depends on the individual case.

[Frenchwife 1]

Pushbrk

Seems to me you comment without looking at the figures / lists provided.

Or even reading properly my post.

Maybe you don't look at them because you are not in the queue.

Anyway I don't appreciate your 2 gratuituous non fact-based critiscims

Good night

Edited March 1, 2009 by Frenchwife

[pushbrk 13,105]

Pushbrk

Seems to me you comment without looking at the figures / lists provided.

Or even reading properly my post.

Maybe you don't look at them because you are not in the queue.

Anyway I don't appreciate your 2 gratuituous non fact-based critiscims

Good night

I looked at your statistics. It's meaningless to compare the number of products coming out one end without knowing what went in the other end. The misconception I described is just that, a misconception. This is not a one-step automatic process. Cases hit snags, and nobody is holding the fast moving cases while snagged ones catch up. If a case is moving slower than another, it's for a reason.

I'm responding for the benefit of others who can understand the misconception and learn from the clarification, whomever they may be. The toughest part of the visa process is the black hole between NOA1 and NOA2. It doesn't help to obsess over it irrationally.

[Y's_habibitk 2]

Pushbrk

Seems to me you comment without looking at the figures / lists provided.

Or even reading properly my post.

Maybe you don't look at them because you are not in the queue.

Anyway I don't appreciate your 2 gratuituous non fact-based critiscims

Good night

I looked at your statistics. It's meaningless to compare the number of products coming out one end without knowing what went in the other end. The misconception I described is just that, a misconception. This is not a one-step automatic process. Cases hit snags, and nobody is holding the fast moving cases while snagged ones catch up. If a case is moving slower than another, it's for a reason.

I'm responding for the benefit of others who can understand the misconception and learn from the clarification, whomever they may be. The toughest part of the visa process is the black hole between NOA1 and NOA2. It doesn't help to obsess over it irrationally.

It's also doesnt help to dimiss people who are waiting and venting..

the facts are that we dont know how many cases were received when ours were. we dont know how many cases hit "snags" . its also a FACT that workers do not work at the same pace. So, its not a fact that if your case is taking longer than others that its because your case has a "snag"

please see the "facts" as posted by a former worker. http://www.visajourney.com/forums/index.ph...dicator-q-and-a

this may be beneficial to someone in the black hole in the future

[NatPatBen 3]

It's also doesnt help to dimiss people who are waiting and venting..

the facts are that we dont know how many cases were received when ours were. we dont know how many cases hit "snags" . its also a FACT that workers do not work at the same pace. So, its not a fact that if your case is taking longer than others that its because your case has a "snag"

please see the "facts" as posted by a former worker. http://www.visajourney.com/forums/index.ph...dicator-q-and-a

this may be beneficial to someone in the black hole in the future

Thanks for that link! I hadn't seen it before & find this interview quite informative.

[pushbrk 13,105]

Pushbrk

Seems to me you comment without looking at the figures / lists provided.

Or even reading properly my post.

Maybe you don't look at them because you are not in the queue.

Anyway I don't appreciate your 2 gratuituous non fact-based critiscims

Good night

I looked at your statistics. It's meaningless to compare the number of products coming out one end without knowing what went in the other end. The misconception I described is just that, a misconception. This is not a one-step automatic process. Cases hit snags, and nobody is holding the fast moving cases while snagged ones catch up. If a case is moving slower than another, it's for a reason.

I'm responding for the benefit of others who can understand the misconception and learn from the clarification, whomever they may be. The toughest part of the visa process is the black hole between NOA1 and NOA2. It doesn't help to obsess over it irrationally.

It's also doesnt help to dimiss people who are waiting and venting..

the facts are that we dont know how many cases were received when ours were. we dont know how many cases hit "snags" . its also a FACT that workers do not work at the same pace. So, its not a fact that if your case is taking longer than others that its because your case has a "snag"

please see the "facts" as posted by a former worker. http://www.visajourney.com/forums/index.ph...dicator-q-and-a

this may be beneficial to someone in the black hole in the future

I'm not dismissing a person for venting. I'm dismissing useless statistics because they are useless.

I didn't say if your case is taking longer it hit a snag. I said it's "for a reason." The reason could be one of the ones you mention, like being unlucky enough to land on the desk of a slow worker. That's a "reason". Not a reason we want to hear but a reason.