Obama to Unveil an Ambitious Budget Plan

[I AM NOT THAT GUY 5,715]

President Obama is putting the finishing touches on an ambitious first budget that seeks to cut the federal deficit in half over the next four years, primarily by raising taxes on business and the wealthy and by slashing spending on the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, administration officials said.

In addition to tackling a deficit swollen by the $787 billion stimulus package and other efforts to ease the nation's economic crisis, the budget blueprint will press aggressively for progress on the domestic agenda Obama outlined during the presidential campaign. This would include key changes to environmental policies and a major expansion of health coverage that Obama hopes to enact later this year.

A summary of Obama's budget request for the fiscal year that begins in October will be delivered to Congress on Thursday, with the complete, multi-hundred-page document to follow in April. But Obama plans to unveil his goals for scaling back record deficits and rebuilding the nation's costly and inefficient health care system Monday, when he addresses more than 100 lawmakers and budget experts at a White House summit on restoring "fiscal responsibility" to Washington.

In his weekly radio and Internet address today, Obama expressed determination to "get exploding deficits under control" and described his budget request as "sober in its assessments, honest in its accounting, and lays out in detail my strategy for investing in what we need, cutting what we don't, and restoring fiscal discipline."

Reducing the deficit, he said, is critical to the nation's future: "We can't generate sustained growth without getting our deficits under control."

Obama faces the long-term challenge of retirement and health programs that threaten to bankrupt the government years down the road, as well as the more immediate problem of deficits bloated by spending on the economy and financial-system bailouts. His budget proposal takes aim at the short-term problem, administration officials said, but also would begin to address the nation's chronic budget imbalance by squeezing savings from the federal health programs for the elderly and the poor.

Even before Congress approved the stimulus package earlier this month, this year's deficit was projected by Congressional budget analysts to approach $1.2 trillion, or 8.3 percent of the overall economy, the highest since World War II. With the stimulus and other expenses, some analysts say the annual gap between federal spending and income could approach $2 trillion when the fiscal year ends in September.

Obama proposes to dramatically reduce those numbers by the end of his first term, cutting the deficit he inherited in half, said administration officials, speaking on condition of anonymity because the budget has yet to be released. His budget plan would keep the deficit hovering near $1 trillion in 2010 and 2011, but shows it dropping to $533 billion in 2013 -- still high in dollar terms, but a more manageable 3 percent of the overall economy.

To get there, Obama proposes to cut spending and raise taxes. The savings would come primarily from "winding down the war" in Iraq, a senior administration official said. The budget assumes that the nation will continue to spend money on "overseas military contingency operations" throughout Obama's presidency, the official said, but that number is significantly lower than the nearly $190 billion the nation budgeted for Iraq and Afghanistan last year.

Obama also seeks to increase tax collections, primarily by making good on his promise to eliminate the temporary tax cuts enacted in 2001 and 2003 for wealthy taxpayers, whom Obama defined during the campaign as those earning more than $250,000 a year. Those tax breaks would be permitted to expire on schedule for the 2011 tax year, when the top tax rate would rise from 35 percent to more than 39 percent.

Obama also proposes to maintain the tax on estates worth more than $3.5 million, instead of letting it expire next year. And he proposes "a fairly aggressive effort on tax enforcement" that would target tax havens and corporate loopholes, among other provisions, the official said.

Overall, tax collections under the plan would rise from about 16 percent of the economy this year to 19 percent in 2013, while federal spending would drop from about 26 percent of the economy, another post-war high, to 22 percent.

Republicans, who are already painting Obama as a profligate spender, are laying plans to attack him on taxes as well. Even some non-partisan observers question the wisdom of announcing a plan to raise taxes in the midst of a recession. But senior White House adviser David Axelrod said in an interview that the tax proposals reflect the ideas that won the election last fall.

"This is consistent with what the president talked about throughout the campaign," and "restores some balance to the tax code in a way that protects the middle class," Axelrod said. "Most Americans will come out very well here."

The budget also puts in place the building blocks of what administration officials say will be a broad restructuring of the U.S. health system, an effort aimed at covering some of the 46 million Americans who lack insurance while controlling costs and improving quality. Many lawmakers said they had expected a health care overhaul to be pushed off while Obama deals with the economic crisis, but administration officials stressed they intend to forge ahead with comprehensive reform.

"The budget will kick off or facilitate a focus on getting health care done this year," the senior official said, adding that the White House is planning a summit on health care. The event has been delayed by former senator Tom Daschle's decision to withdraw from consideration as health secretary because of tax problems, a move that left Obama without key member of his health team.

Administration officials and outside experts say the most likely path to revamping the health system is to begin with Medicare, the federal program for retirees and people with disabilities, and Medicaid, which serves the poor. Together, the two programs cover about 100 million people at a cost of $561 billion in 2007. Making policy changes in those programs -- such as rewarding physicians who computerize their medical records or paying doctors for results rather than procedures--could improve care while generating long-term savings, expert say. It also could prod private insurers to follow suit.

Obama's budget request would create "running room for health reform," the official said, by reducing spending on some health programs so the administration would have money to devote to initiatives to expand coverage. The biggest target is bonus payments to insurance companies that run managed-care programs under Medicare, known as Medicare Advantage.

The Bush-era program has attracted nearly a quarter of Medicare beneficiaries to private health insurance plans that generally cover a package of services such as doctor visits, prescription drugs and eyeglasses. But the government pays the plans between 13 and 17 percent more than it pays for traditional fee-for-service coverage, according to the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission, which advises Congress on Medicare financing issues. Democrats have long complained about the cost, and eliminating the extra payments would save about $35 billion over the next five years.

Administration officials also are debating whether to permit people as young as 55 to purchase coverage through Medicare. That age group is particularly vulnerable in today's weakened economy, as many have lost jobs or seen insurance premiums rise rapidly. The cost would depend on whether recipients were offered a discount or required to pay the full price of coverage.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/conte...2100911_pf.html

Edited February 21, 2009 by Mister_Bill

[one...two...tree 2,762]

Bringing us back to Clinton's plan...

Clinton's Policies vs. Bush's Policies....hmmm....tough choice.

[dalegg 143]

President Obama is putting the finishing touches on an ambitious first budget that seeks to cut the federal deficit in half over the next four years, primarily by raising taxes on business and the wealthy and by slashing spending on the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, administration officials said.

Excellent idea Mr. Obama. I'm sure this will not result in a single layoff. And the point of the stimulus package was what again?

In his weekly radio and Internet address today, Obama expressed determination to "get exploding deficits under control" and described his budget request as "sober in its assessments, honest in its accounting, and lays out in detail my strategy for investing in what we need, cutting what we don't, and restoring fiscal discipline."

Reducing the deficit, he said, is critical to the nation's future: "We can't generate sustained growth without getting our deficits under control."

uhh. but the stimulus.. nevermind. There are in fact two sides to everyone's mouth.

[Saddle Bronc 124]

Bringing us back to Clinton's plan...

Clinton's Policies vs. Bush's Policies....hmmm....tough choice.

Well, Clinton actually ran deficits 1993 and 1994. But due to panic of Millenium-bug (interestingly, North America was where most panic was; Europeans, especially Hebrideans would have taken it stoically) result was M-b-fixing IT boom (and post-Bubba IT bust due to 2000 passing without foretold disasters) which led to much revenue and surpli (is this correct plural of surplus?).

Ergo, no choice--0bama will have to develop his own plan.

[dalegg 143]

Bringing us back to Clinton's plan...

Clinton's Policies vs. Bush's Policies....hmmm....tough choice.

Well, Clinton actually ran deficits 1993 and 1994. But due to panic of Millenium-bug (interestingly, North America was where most panic was; Europeans, especially Hebrideans would have taken it stoically) result was M-b-fixing IT boom (and post-Bubba IT bust due to 2000 passing without foretold disasters) which led to much revenue and surpli (is this correct plural of surplus?).

Ergo, no choice--0bama will have to develop his own plan.

So he just needs his own Al Gore?

[eros_EX_Plumber 0]

Bringing us back to Clinton's plan...

Clinton's Policies vs. Bush's Policies....hmmm....tough choice.

You right.....

Sex in the Oval office vs Unjustifiable War.....

Getting a good Feeling in the Oval Office vs Dead Sons and Daughters for a personal war...

Tough choices

[Ban Hammer 13,332]

President Obama is putting the finishing touches on an ambitious first budget that seeks to cut the federal deficit in half over the next four years, primarily by raising taxes on business and the wealthy and by slashing spending on the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, administration officials said.

Excellent idea Mr. Obama. I'm sure this will not result in a single layoff. And the point of the stimulus package was what again?

[Saddle Bronc 124]

Bringing us back to Clinton's plan...

Clinton's Policies vs. Bush's Policies....hmmm....tough choice.

Well, Clinton actually ran deficits 1993 and 1994. But due to panic of Millenium-bug (interestingly, North America was where most panic was; Europeans, especially Hebrideans would have taken it stoically) result was M-b-fixing IT boom (and post-Bubba IT bust due to 2000 passing without foretold disasters) which led to much revenue and surpli (is this correct plural of surplus?).

Ergo, no choice--0bama will have to develop his own plan.

So he just needs his own Al Gore?

0bama's VP Bidet-on-tap fills that gap already.

[dalegg 143]

Wall street is going to love this.

[eros_EX_Plumber 0]

Bringing us back to Clinton's plan...

Clinton's Policies vs. Bush's Policies....hmmm....tough choice.

Well, Clinton actually ran deficits 1993 and 1994. But due to panic of Millenium-bug (interestingly, North America was where most panic was; Europeans, especially Hebrideans would have taken it stoically) result was M-b-fixing IT boom (and post-Bubba IT bust due to 2000 passing without foretold disasters) which led to much revenue and surpli (is this correct plural of surplus?).

Ergo, no choice--0bama will have to develop his own plan.

So he just needs his own Al Gore?

0bama's VP Bidet-on-tap fills that gap already.

HEHEHE...

like McCain VP------ if it was elected was any better?

LMAO

[Saddle Bronc 124]

Bringing us back to Clinton's plan...

Clinton's Policies vs. Bush's Policies....hmmm....tough choice.

Well, Clinton actually ran deficits 1993 and 1994. But due to panic of Millenium-bug (interestingly, North America was where most panic was; Europeans, especially Hebrideans would have taken it stoically) result was M-b-fixing IT boom (and post-Bubba IT bust due to 2000 passing without foretold disasters) which led to much revenue and surpli (is this correct plural of surplus?).

Ergo, no choice--0bama will have to develop his own plan.

So he just needs his own Al Gore?

0bama's VP Bidet-on-tap fills that gap already.

HEHEHE...

like McCain VP------ if it was elected was any better?LMAO

Palin was a female version of Calgary Mayor (and Alberta Premier) "King" Ralph Klein, having been success as mayor and governor (admittedly, I can't say whether Klein would work as Canada PM).

But Bidet-on-tap has been successful at...

I said, "Bidet-on-tap has been successful at..."--nevermind.

[I AM NOT THAT GUY 5,715]

Bringing us back to Clinton's plan...

Clinton's Policies vs. Bush's Policies....hmmm....tough choice.

Well, Clinton actually ran deficits 1993 and 1994. But due to panic of Millenium-bug (interestingly, North America was where most panic was; Europeans, especially Hebrideans would have taken it stoically) result was M-b-fixing IT boom (and post-Bubba IT bust due to 2000 passing without foretold disasters) which led to much revenue and surpli (is this correct plural of surplus?).

Ergo, no choice--0bama will have to develop his own plan.

So he just needs his own Al Gore?

0bama's VP Bidet-on-tap fills that gap already.

HEHEHE...

like McCain VP------ if it was elected was any better?

LMAO

[eros_EX_Plumber 0]

Bringing us back to Clinton's plan...

Clinton's Policies vs. Bush's Policies....hmmm....tough choice.

Well, Clinton actually ran deficits 1993 and 1994. But due to panic of Millenium-bug (interestingly, North America was where most panic was; Europeans, especially Hebrideans would have taken it stoically) result was M-b-fixing IT boom (and post-Bubba IT bust due to 2000 passing without foretold disasters) which led to much revenue and surpli (is this correct plural of surplus?).

Ergo, no choice--0bama will have to develop his own plan.

So he just needs his own Al Gore?

0bama's VP Bidet-on-tap fills that gap already.

HEHEHE...

like McCain VP------ if it was elected was any better?

LMAO

Something to look forward in 4 years....the shining star of the GOP...

[Jasman0717 9]

Bringing us back to Clinton's plan...

Clinton's Policies vs. Bush's Policies....hmmm....tough choice.

Well, Clinton actually ran deficits 1993 and 1994. But due to panic of Millenium-bug (interestingly, North America was where most panic was; Europeans, especially Hebrideans would have taken it stoically) result was M-b-fixing IT boom (and post-Bubba IT bust due to 2000 passing without foretold disasters) which led to much revenue and surpli (is this correct plural of surplus?).

Ergo, no choice--0bama will have to develop his own plan.

So he just needs his own Al Gore?

[I AM NOT THAT GUY 5,715]

Bringing us back to Clinton's plan...

Clinton's Policies vs. Bush's Policies....hmmm....tough choice.

Well, Clinton actually ran deficits 1993 and 1994. But due to panic of Millenium-bug (interestingly, North America was where most panic was; Europeans, especially Hebrideans would have taken it stoically) result was M-b-fixing IT boom (and post-Bubba IT bust due to 2000 passing without foretold disasters) which led to much revenue and surpli (is this correct plural of surplus?).

Ergo, no choice--0bama will have to develop his own plan.

So he just needs his own Al Gore?

Or, Walter Mondale