Keep Your Job, Lose Your Health Insurance

[one...two...tree 2,762]

By Monica Sanchez, Campaign for America's Future

These days you don't have to lose your job to lose your health care benefits, see them cut or have to pay more for them. Employers are trimming costs by decreasing their share of the cost of employee health insurance coverage or dropping coverage altogether. While this has been a growing trend over the past decade, the weak economy has forced an increase in those cuts.

According to The Washington Post, ten years ago, employers paid about 90 percent of their workers' health costs. That is down to 73 percent.

And the cost to employees will increase this year. The Washington Post outlines the bad news:

"A growing number of workers in 2009 will pay more for health benefits -- and in some cases receive less coverage -- as their employers grapple with the financial fallout of rising medical expenses and diminished revenue and profits, recent surveys of human resource officials show.

"The Corporate Executive Board found in its survey that a quarter of officials from 350 large corporations said they had increased deductibles an average of 9 percent in 2008. But

30 percent of the employers said they expected to raise deductibles an average of 14 percent in 2009

. Mercer, a global benefits consulting firm, surveyed nearly 2,000 large corporations in a representative poll and found that 44 percent planned to increase employee-paid portion of premiums in 2009, compared with 40 percent in 2008." [Emphasis added]

Employees of small businesses are even more heavily affected. According to MSNBC's "Your Biz":

"It's getting ugly out there for small business owners that have been struggling to keep on paying high health insurance premiums for themselves and their workers. So ugly, in fact, that more and more are just dropping coverage. Because of ever-escalating premiums and falling sales, Craig Sumsky, director of Philadelphia-based DJ company Cutting Edge Entertainment, had to put the kibosh on health insurance for his office manager this year.

"In response, Sumsky's office manager handed in her two-week notice. She needed a job that could get her benefits, he said. Sumsky is not alone. One recent poll put out by credit card company Discover uncovered a disturbing trend: "

Eighty-five percent of small business owners say they do not offer health insurance to their employees, up significantly from 77 percent a year ago and 74 percent in January 2007

. Among small business owners who do offer health insurance, 36 percent say they have considered discontinuing coverage because of high costs." [Emphasis added.]

Employers cutting how much they contribute toward their health insurance is not the only reason employees' health care costs are rising. According to a new report by the U.S. Public Interest Research Group, if the health care system in this country is not reformed, premiums for Americans with employer-sponsored insurance will nearly double by 2016.

U.S. PIRG Health Care Advocate Larry McNeely says, "The health care reforms in President Obama's economic recovery plan are indispensable first steps to addressing this crisis." He adds his support for the president's economic recovery plan's investment in the health care infrastructure:

"This legislation funding of health information technology, evidence-based prevention, and comparative effectiveness research will set the stage for the broader reforms needed to address the high cost of health care."

Another important aspect of President Obama's health care reform plan is the addition of a public health insurance plan option to drive more value in our health care system by competing side-by-side with private insurance and using its bargaining power to rein in costs.

In his analysis of how a hybrid public/private plan choice would improve the U.S. health care system, "The Case For Public Plan Choice In National Health Reform", Jacob Hacker concludes that a national public health insurance plan option would allow for a much larger and broader risk pool and would be in a better position to contain overall health care costs by using its large membership in negotiating for discounts. It can also test and, where appropriate, implement evidence-based protocols, which private plans may choose to shun because of cost concerns, for treatments and payment systems, rewarding value.

And Americans want that choice. A new poll conducted by Lake Research Partners on behalf of Health Care for America Now (HCAN) found there is "intense and widespread voter support" for the choice of a public health insurance plan as part of comprehensive, national health care reform even when voters hear the sharpest insurance industry attacks on a public plan. In paired statements supporting and attacking a public health insurance plan, a majority of voters choose the statement backing a public health insurance option every time. For example:

• 62% of voters believe a public health insurance plan will spend less on profits and administration and force private insurers to compete.
  • Only 28% of voters believe the attack that a public health insurance plan would be a "big, government bureaucracy."

• 60% believe that if private insurers are really more efficient than government, then they won't have any trouble competing with a public health insurance plan.
  • Only 23% believe a public health insurance plan would have an unfair advantage over private plans.

While recent polling has shown consistent broad support for comprehensive health care reform, this poll specifically addressed whether people want a choice of a public health insurance plan. The answer is an overwhelming yes:

• 73% of voters want a choice of a private or public health insurance plan, including Democrats (77%), Independents (79%), and Republicans (63%).

"Voters strongly value having a choice of private or public health insurance plans and support having the guaranteed, affordable coverage that a public health insurance plan provides. They also believe that a public health insurance plan will help contain costs in ways that private insurers have failed to do," said Celinda Lake, President of Lake Research Partners.

Let's make sure our representatives in Congress are listening.

http://www.alternet.org/healthwellness/125...alth_insurance/

[Jasman0717 9]

I remember starting with Martin Marietta in 1985. they paid our medical plan and our deductable was 90/10. Those days are gone forever

[Reba 2]

Our medical plan was changed 1st Jan this year. Our employee paid premiums went down by $20 per week (whoopdydoo ) but our deductibles were significantly increased. Unless one of us suffers some catastrophic illness or injury, I don't think we'll reach our deductible this year.

**edited to add**

I just remembered, last year our prescriptions were covered from day one, we only had a co-pay. This year they are subject to deductibles, and we have to pay them until we've reached our deductible. My husband's monthly medications now cost us over $300 per month, and mine are $50 or something. One of mine I haven't even filled yet because I'm afraid to see how much it'll cost.

Edited February 8, 2009 by Reba

[spookyturtle 9,466]

Another change for the worse brought on by the bad economy. Let's hope the stimulus takes some of the sting out of it.

[Peikko 1,575]

If America doesn't change and drastically, its health care system it will become a third world country.

[one...two...tree 2,762]

Our medical plan was changed 1st Jan this year. Our employee paid premiums went down by $20 per week (whoopdydoo ) but our deductibles were significantly increased. Unless one of us suffers some catastrophic illness or injury, I don't think we'll reach our deductible this year.

**edited to add**

I just remembered, last year our prescriptions were covered from day one, we only had a co-pay. This year they are subject to deductibles, and we have to pay them until we've reached our deductible. My husband's monthly medications now cost us over $300 per month, and mine are $50 or something. One of mine I haven't even filled yet because I'm afraid to see how much it'll cost.

Oh my, Reba.

[Marilyn. 340]

where my hubby works they used to pay 100 percent.. but then about year and a half ago they dropped it to 90 percent.. hopefully they don't drop it more this year...

Edited February 8, 2009 by *Marilyn*

[I AM NOT THAT GUY 5,715]

Being self-employed doesn't help either. My premiums usually increase $40 to $50 a month each year. More and more proceedures are no longer covered under the personal plans, and drug copays went up 300% last year. My wive's plan through her work is much better, and now that she was just made full time, I am waiting for the next open enrollment period to get on her plan.

You can't blame the employers for cutting corners, when they are faced with increasing premium costs. And, let's not even discuss dental!

[dalegg 143]

My share went up by 15% this year AND the damn insurance company doesn't pay for my wife's inhaler anymore! This ticks me off. They're telling us which specific type of Asthma medicine she can use, even though it doesn't work! We have to pay that one out of pocket. Thing is that it costs about $10 for ventilin in Vietnam and $50 in the US. What's up with that?

[Angel7422 0]

My job pays the health insurance premiums for its employees but if you add family coverage then its $180-$200 the the employee will have to pay. I spoke to my insurance company and I found out its cheaper for me to get a 60 day supply of my meds for me and my husband which sometimes costs between $10.00 - $50.00 copay per prescription. Now with the recession the health insurance at my job is being reevaluated and they are taking about making employees pay for being overweight, having high cholestrol, etc. Employees have to pay an extra premium of $20.00-$30.00 a month on top of any other premiums they pay if he/she and/or their dependents (covered under the insurance plan) smoke.