Jump to content

21 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Timeline

The 2007 Case in Houston that you are citing is a case involving a "border jumping shopper" that was able to adjust based upon a valid I-130. This cannot be equated to a K visa entrant where the K visa is specifically, and by law restricted to adjustment through the initial petitioner. The same? I think not!

Case law as pointed out indicates only that she is not eligible to adjust status based on her old visa. She IS eligible if a new I130 petition is filed (don't leave out "classes of aliens eligible). They will be treated as a legal arrival / followed by overstay and marriage to USC. Requires new I130, new I485, and probably an I485 supplement A with a $1000 penalty payment (not sure about the exact requirements of the 3rd but that is typical for marriage to USC after a significant overstay or beneficiary working illegally in the US after entry). Eligibility for status adjustment is based on the new I130 petition and marriage to the petitioner. After that it is a wait and see game - the case will stand or fall on its own merits. Interview will be at the local US office with jurisdiction over their residence (not in the beneficiary's country, where does that come from?). You should probably advise your friend not to leave the US for any reason until the case is processed.

Disclaimer: This process is based on a known 2007 case in Houston of a 4-year overstay and subsequent marriage to USC. Initial entry was on border pass for "shopping". Beneficiary entered, worked illegally during the (4) year period, and never looked back. Case was approved. This may not be completely applicable to the particular case above. Couple in referenced case used the "Johnny Cochran" of immigration attorneys aka the best one they could locate and it is advisable for couples with "sticky cases" to do the same lol

H to all,

My friend's spouse first came to the U.S. on a K-3 visa 5 yrs ago sponsored by someone else but their marriage didn't work so they divorced and my friend's spouse never adjust her status.

Is she eligible to adjust her status with her new husband?

any similar case?

Her new husband would need to file a I-130 along with the AOS. see guide http://www.visajourney.com/forums/index.ph...page=i130guide2

That sounds like it would work but I'd consult a qualified immigration attorney first.

Won't happen. If she never adjusted status based upon marriage with the frirst husband, she cannot adjust status with a new hubby. This is true for K-1 and K-3. He can file the I-130 for the new spouse, but the interview will be in the foreign country. Dont asccumulate illegal presencde or you will received a ban for re-entry without a waiver.

"diaddie mermaid"

You can 'catch' me on here and on FBI.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

wow, this case is really complicated,

hopefully we cant get some more info about this case, one more thing they have a baby here already thats why returning to the country of her origin is not her option.

thanks a lot guys

It's really not that complicated at all. 8 CFR 245.1 c, as quoted by desert_fox above, makes it clear that there can be no adjustment of status for someone who entered on a K-3 visa except through marriage to the original petitioner. Period. Adjustment of status is not an available option. (And the quoted case above of someone who adjusted status from something other than a K-3 visa is irrelevant to this point).

The one possibility I can think of for gaining status without leaving the US is that, after she's been here 10 years, if she's been placed in removal proceedings, she just might be eligible for cancellation of removal under INA 240A(B). This would not be an easy case, and the cost of failure would be high.

The straightforward route would be to leave the US, apply for a visa based on the new marriage, and perhaps apply for a waiver if she's accumulated too much illegal presence. I'd still expect they'd look at the case with a skeptical eye, because she used the K visa process once to gain entry to the US.

If the purpose of the original immigration was to support the marriage, then as soon as the marriage ended, there would have been no reason to stay in the US. But if the purpose of the original marriage was to support the immigration, staying in the US after the marriage ended would have been a logical thing to do. But marrying for immigration purposes is illegal and carries a lifetime ban. She'll have to show she didn't do that.

04 Apr, 2004: Got married

05 Apr, 2004: I-130 Sent to CSC

13 Apr, 2004: I-130 NOA 1

19 Apr, 2004: I-129F Sent to MSC

29 Apr, 2004: I-129F NOA 1

13 Aug, 2004: I-130 Approved by CSC

28 Dec, 2004: I-130 Case Complete at NVC

18 Jan, 2005: Got the visa approved in Caracas

22 Jan, 2005: Flew home together! CCS->MIA->SFO

25 May, 2005: I-129F finally approved! We won't pursue it.

8 June, 2006: Our baby girl is born!

24 Oct, 2006: Window for filing I-751 opens

25 Oct, 2006: I-751 mailed to CSC

18 Nov, 2006: I-751 NOA1 received from CSC

30 Nov, 2006: I-751 Biometrics taken

05 Apr, 2007: I-751 approved, card production ordered

23 Jan, 2008: N-400 sent to CSC via certified mail

19 Feb, 2008: N-400 Biometrics taken

27 Mar, 2008: Naturalization interview notice received (NOA2 for N-400)

30 May, 2008: Naturalization interview, passed the test!

17 June, 2008: Naturalization oath notice mailed

15 July, 2008: Naturalization oath ceremony!

16 July, 2008: Registered to vote and applied for US passport

26 July, 2008: US Passport arrived.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

H to all,

My friend's spouse first came to the U.S. on a K-3 visa 5 yrs ago sponsored by someone else but their marriage didn't work so they divorced and my friend's spouse never adjust her status.

Is she eligible to adjust her status with her new husband?

any similar case?

Have your friend contact an attorney.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 10 months later...
Filed: Lift. Cond. (apr) Country: India
Timeline

Get a lawyer.

Logic tells me that AOS won't be permitted because the K-3 can only adjust status based only on her marriage to the original USC petitioner.

Best to go with the CR-1 route. A waiver might be required depending on her overstay.

03/27/2009: Engaged in Ithaca, New York.
08/17/2009: Wedding in Calcutta, India.
09/29/2009: I-130 NOA1
01/25/2010: I-130 NOA2
03/23/2010: Case completed.
05/12/2010: CR-1 interview at Mumbai, India.
05/20/2010: US Entry, Chicago.
03/01/2012: ROC NOA1.
03/26/2012: Biometrics completed.
12/07/2012: 10 year card production ordered.

09/25/2013: N-400 NOA1

10/16/2013: Biometrics completed

12/03/2013: Interview

12/20/2013: Oath ceremony

event.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Vietnam
Timeline
Get a lawyer.

Logic tells me that AOS won't be permitted because the K-3 can only adjust status based only on her marriage to the original USC petitioner.

Best to go with the CR-1 route. A waiver might be required depending on her overstay.

Uhh... This thread is almost a year old. What prompted you to dig it up now? :blink:

12/15/2009 - K1 Visa Interview - APPROVED!

12/29/2009 - Married in Oakland, CA!

08/18/2010 - AOS Interview - APPROVED!

05/01/2013 - Removal of Conditions - APPROVED!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Philippines
Timeline

got an update.

Its a miracle, they pass the interview. no question ask about her old k-3 visa.

for now on don't believe on this lawyers, we went to rreeves,gurfincel,.

12-24-08- 129F SENT TO CSC

12-26-08- PACKAGE RECEIVED SIGNED BY: V SEMEGI

12-30-08- NOA1 SENT

12-31-08- MONEY ORDER CASHED

01-03-09- NOA1 HARDCOPY RECEIVED

01-02-09- TOUCHED

03-11-09 EMAIL APPROVAL/NOA2 WOW 71 DAYS ONLY!

03-14-09 NOA2 HARDCOPY IN MAIL

03-16-09 NVC IS WORKING ON IT.. GOT MY MNL CASE#

03-17-09 NVC FORWARDED CASE TO USEM

05-07-09 INTERVIEW FOR K1 VISA APPROVED

06-08-09 ARRIVAL AT LAX

06-22-09 APPLIED FOR SSN

06-26-09 WENT TO DMV OFFICE FOR ID

08-13-09 WEDDING DAY

11-01-09 USCIS RECEIVED MY I-485,I-765

11-06-09 NOTICE DATE/NOA1 SENT

11-12-09 I-485 TOUCHED

12-01-09 SCHEDULED BIOMETRICS

I-751 (LIFTING CONDITIONAL RESIDENT)

1-20-12 1-751 SENT TO CSC

1-21-12 CSC RECEIVED

1-23-12 NOA DATE

1-31-12 EARLY BIOMETRICS (ASC WILSHIRE) (ORIG FEB 14,2012)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...