not married, the 90 days expired

[luckytxn 2,264]

Don't blame the messenger.

stand over by that wall and hold this

Ok, sure.

[brnidokiegurl 0]

Being GOD an a$$wipe must be kind of exhausting....

Fixxored

[truffles 2]

Both your posts contain misinformation. Since know you're "not sure", why not refrain from the errant speculation.

There is no legal way for this poster to stay unless she marries the petitioner but there is a legal path after the marriage. Unless she can successfully claim abuse, she'll remain illegal and already has sufficient overstay to be banned from future US entry for 10 years.

Nothing contains misinformation.

I did a search, I found the information and corrected myself and gave the poster options.

Get off your high horse..AS USUAL.

This from your first post is "misinformation".

Even if you got married now and filed for AOS, your case would probably be denied, I'm not sure on that one.

Since you weren't sure, IMO better to be sure first or say nothing on the subject.

This from your second post is "misinformation".

Exactly, I think the best bet would be returning home and trying to file for another K1 visa...a waiver will be needed.

Waivers are not required for being a beneficiary the second time. They are required for petitioners filing multiple petitions. Since the current "fiance petitioner" has no intention of marrying the OP, he wouldn't be filing any second petition. Without marrying the original petitioner, she has no "best bet" but to leave the US or remain illegally.

Please try to control your "premature postaculations".

Pushbrk - You yourself have in many post placed a disclaimer to the effect you could be mistaken therefore dont you think that could be construed that YOU werent sure ? However that didnt stop you from making your post.

You are not immune to getting it wrong too - I recall at least one incident regarding the recent changes to the medical procedures and paperwork - at least the poster went and researched the correction.

[pushbrk 12,830]

Both your posts contain misinformation. Since know you're "not sure", why not refrain from the errant speculation.

There is no legal way for this poster to stay unless she marries the petitioner but there is a legal path after the marriage. Unless she can successfully claim abuse, she'll remain illegal and already has sufficient overstay to be banned from future US entry for 10 years.

Nothing contains misinformation.

I did a search, I found the information and corrected myself and gave the poster options.

Get off your high horse..AS USUAL.

This from your first post is "misinformation".

Even if you got married now and filed for AOS, your case would probably be denied, I'm not sure on that one.

Since you weren't sure, IMO better to be sure first or say nothing on the subject.

This from your second post is "misinformation".

Exactly, I think the best bet would be returning home and trying to file for another K1 visa...a waiver will be needed.

Waivers are not required for being a beneficiary the second time. They are required for petitioners filing multiple petitions. Since the current "fiance petitioner" has no intention of marrying the OP, he wouldn't be filing any second petition. Without marrying the original petitioner, she has no "best bet" but to leave the US or remain illegally.

Please try to control your "premature postaculations".

Pushbrk - You yourself have in many post placed a disclaimer to the effect you could be mistaken therefore dont you think that could be construed that YOU werent sure ? However that didnt stop you from making your post.

You are not immune to getting it wrong too - I recall at least one incident regarding the recent changes to the medical procedures and paperwork - at least the poster went and researched the correction.

Yes, sometimes I get it wrong. One need not be perfect to point out harmful misinformation or to suggest a poster who quite commonly incorrectly speculates, simply wait to make an assertion until they are sure or just let others provide the answer.

Persons stating, "This is wrong." are not implying "I'm always right." It's a mistake to make such and inference. Instead, it would be wiser, IMO, to take the correction at face value.

[*julez* 124]

Both your posts contain misinformation. Since know you're "not sure", why not refrain from the errant speculation.

There is no legal way for this poster to stay unless she marries the petitioner but there is a legal path after the marriage. Unless she can successfully claim abuse, she'll remain illegal and already has sufficient overstay to be banned from future US entry for 10 years.

Nothing contains misinformation.

I did a search, I found the information and corrected myself and gave the poster options.

Get off your high horse..AS USUAL.

This from your first post is "misinformation".

Even if you got married now and filed for AOS, your case would probably be denied, I'm not sure on that one.

Since you weren't sure, IMO better to be sure first or say nothing on the subject.

This from your second post is "misinformation".

Exactly, I think the best bet would be returning home and trying to file for another K1 visa...a waiver will be needed.

Waivers are not required for being a beneficiary the second time. They are required for petitioners filing multiple petitions. Since the current "fiance petitioner" has no intention of marrying the OP, he wouldn't be filing any second petition. Without marrying the original petitioner, she has no "best bet" but to leave the US or remain illegally.

Please try to control your "premature postaculations".

Pushbrk - You yourself have in many post placed a disclaimer to the effect you could be mistaken therefore dont you think that could be construed that YOU werent sure ? However that didnt stop you from making your post.

You are not immune to getting it wrong too - I recall at least one incident regarding the recent changes to the medical procedures and paperwork - at least the poster went and researched the correction.

Yes, sometimes I get it wrong. One need not be perfect to point out harmful misinformation or to suggest a poster who quite commonly incorrectly speculates, simply wait to make an assertion until they are sure or just let others provide the answer.

Persons stating, "This is wrong." are not implying "I'm always right." It's a mistake to make such and inference. Instead, it would be wiser, IMO, to take the correction at face value.

Hilarious given that this is something that you, yourself, are consistently incapable of doing. Another case of pushbrk's "Do as I say, not as I do." So refreshing.

[Jenn! 918]

Topic closed until further notice.