Jump to content

7 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: India
Timeline
Posted

K-1 Visa

How is it possible that applications with NOA1's of august and even september have been issued NOA2's before those of NOA1's of June and July (all at the same service service center - Vermont)? Does anyone have an idea? Or are people just inputting their timeline iformation incorrectly? I'm confused. Is it country specific? I assumed they would process cases chronologically, no?

___________________________________

I-129F

07/02/2008 - MAILED I-129F TO VSC

07/28/2008 - NOA1

03/25/2009 - NOA2

03/30/2009 - NVC mailed I-129F to New Delhi

04/06/2009 - New Delhi Embassy mailed Packet 3 to fiance

04/11/2009 - Mailed back Packet 3 forms to Embassy

05/16/2009 - Received Packet 4

05/21/2009 - Submitted documents to VFS office

06/03/2009 - Interview. Visa approved

.........

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Colombia
Timeline
Posted

It depends on the person who's handling the petition, the service center and the type of petitions they are processing. Some are faster than others, some have a bigger work load than others, some petitions are easier to process than others.

Diana

CR-1

02/05/07 - I-130 sent to NSC

05/03/07 - NOA2

05/10/07 - NVC receives petition, case # assigned

08/08/07 - Case Complete

09/27/07 - Interview, visa granted

10/02/07 - POE

11/16/07 - Received green card and Welcome to America letter in the mail

Removing Conditions

07/06/09 - I-751 sent to CSC

08/14/09 - Biometrics

09/27/09 - Approved

10/01/09 - Received 10 year green card

U.S. Citizenship

03/30/11 - N-400 sent via Priority Mail w/ delivery confirmation

05/12/11 - Biometrics

07/20/11 - Interview - passed

07/20/11 - Oath ceremony - same day as interview

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ukraine
Timeline
Posted
K-1 Visa

How is it possible that applications with NOA1's of august and even september have been issued NOA2's before those of NOA1's of June and July (all at the same service service center - Vermont)? Does anyone have an idea? Or are people just inputting their timeline iformation incorrectly? I'm confused. Is it country specific? I assumed they would process cases chronologically, no?

LOL. Sorry for laughing. You are applying logic and reason to a government operation. The cases are not "processed" chronologically, they may (or may not) be ASSIGNED chronologically but if someone's sloppy cases tied up the clerk you are assigned to or if he/she goes on vacation or gets sick, your case waits and others move along. Also VSC was short handed for a long time and many cases piled up on existing clerks, now they have hired "lots" of new people (according to my friend's wife who works there) and some of them now are completeing the training process and being assigned new cases. So, for example, if your case was piled on to an overworked clerk in Sept. and someone sends one in today and it is handed to a new hire, their case (the one sent today) can be processed much faster than yours. Incidentally, provided you give everything need with your petition, it takes about 15 minutes to adjudicate a case. Bet you didn't know that. The rest of the time you are waiting while they are on coffee break (do I sound cynical?) Really, a clean case takes about 15 minutes or less to process.

The VSC has also started a process of using "contractors" working out of their homes to process cases which have been "triaged" and determined to be "clean cases". These are given to people working at home and there is no particular demand for them to complete any particular "quota" of cases. Yours could be sitting on someones bookcase while they are out snowmobiling or something. Ice fishing has been really good lately, who knows?

My case got processed in 58 days in VSC but I submitted in March. Too warm for skiing and ice fishing, too cold for swimming, hiking, biking. I mean , in Vermont in March there really is nothing TO do except work...dammit! Oh well, it makes about as much sense as anything else.

VERMONT! I Reject Your Reality...and Substitute My Own!

Gary And Alla

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Zambia
Timeline
Posted

About 18 months ago, I had a good phone conversation with a USCIS staffer who acknowledged that K-1 petitions involving certain foreign nations were given a faster track in processing than those involving high fraud rates. Perhaps this explains why there seem to be discrepancies. It made good sense to me that greater scrutiny was needed where the potential for fraud was greater. Either way, they get their work done ... eventually.

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Egypt
Timeline
Posted
About 18 months ago, I had a good phone conversation with a USCIS staffer who acknowledged that K-1 petitions involving certain foreign nations were given a faster track in processing than those involving high fraud rates. Perhaps this explains why there seem to be discrepancies. It made good sense to me that greater scrutiny was needed where the potential for fraud was greater. Either way, they get their work done ... eventually.

really? i am still waiting :blink:

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Zambia
Timeline
Posted
About 18 months ago, I had a good phone conversation with a USCIS staffer who acknowledged that K-1 petitions involving certain foreign nations were given a faster track in processing than those involving high fraud rates. Perhaps this explains why there seem to be discrepancies. It made good sense to me that greater scrutiny was needed where the potential for fraud was greater. Either way, they get their work done ... eventually.

really? i am still waiting :blink:

Wow. That's inexcusable. What have you done to follow up? Have you contacted your US Senator?

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Egypt
Timeline
Posted
About 18 months ago, I had a good phone conversation with a USCIS staffer who acknowledged that K-1 petitions involving certain foreign nations were given a faster track in processing than those involving high fraud rates. Perhaps this explains why there seem to be discrepancies. It made good sense to me that greater scrutiny was needed where the potential for fraud was greater. Either way, they get their work done ... eventually.

really? i am still waiting :blink:

Wow. That's inexcusable. What have you done to follow up? Have you contacted your US Senator?

ha congressman, senators, ombudsman, what ever u can think of we have done

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...