Jump to content
Kez/JWolf

NEW I-9 FORM FROM 02/02/09

By Kez/JWolf in US Immigration News and Discussion

 Share

10 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Kez/JWolf Mentor

Kez/JWolf   6

Posted
Filed: Timeline
Posted

USCIS has released a new I-9 form.

http://www.uscis.gov/files/form/I-9_IFR_02-02-09.pdf

Major changes are EAD (I-766) now has to have a photograph. So EAD Stamp from JFK is not any good.

I-94 now has to be for a specific employer, so again EAD Stamp no longer any good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Captain Ewok Veteran

Captain Ewok   1,891

Posted
Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Singapore
 Timeline
Posted

As I read it someone could show List B Item #1 and List C Item #8 (which would be the EAD stamp issued by the CIS (part of DHS)). If this is true then the stamp is still able to be used with a valid form of identification (List B).

I am an Ewok. I am here to to keep the peace. Please contact me if you have a problem with the site or a complaint regarding a violation of the Terms of Service. For the fastest response please use the 'Contact Us' page to contact me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rebeccajo Grand Master

rebeccajo   14

Posted
Filed: Other Timeline
Posted
As I read it someone could show List B Item #1 and List C Item #8 (which would be the EAD stamp issued by the CIS (part of DHS)). If this is true then the stamp is still able to be used with a valid form of identification (List B).

Well, an alien is going to be hard-pressed in most states to get a driver's license without an EAD. In most states the K1 visa in the passport alone is not sufficient for a state to issue a driver's license.

Captain the old wording was this:

"An unexpired foreign passport with an unexpired Arrival-Departure Record, Form I-94, bearing the same name as the passport and containing an endorsement of the alien's nonimmigrant status, if that status authorizes the alien to work for the employer."

Both myself and diadramous mermaid have opined in the past that this wording implied only work-authorized non-immigrants possess the proper I-94 to satisfy the requirements. It now appears the Service is clarifying the wording.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TBoneTX Grand Master

TBoneTX   45,304

Posted
Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
 Timeline
Posted

Fascinating, RJ, and helpful to see intact, in one document. The document's date is January 2007; is there a link to a newer version?

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rebeccajo Grand Master

rebeccajo   14

Posted
Filed: Other Timeline
Posted
Fascinating, RJ, and helpful to see intact, in one document. The document's date is January 2007; is there a link to a newer version?

Not that particular document, at least not that I can find.

But there is plenty of information about immigrants rights and the driver's license debacle on NILC.org.

It also appear that the I-9 is not resolved:

http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/men...0004718190aRCRD

Link to comment
Share on other sites
daboyz Experienced

daboyz   36

Posted
Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Thailand
 Timeline
Posted
Fascinating, RJ, and helpful to see intact, in one document. The document's date is January 2007; is there a link to a newer version?

si man?

Service Center : Vermont Service Center

Consulate : Bangkok, Thailand

Marriage : 2006-11-08

I-130 Sent : 2008-02-22

I-130 NOA1 : 2008-03-10

I-129F Sent : 2008-04-08

I-129F NOA1 : 2008-04-14

I-129F touched: 2008-05-06

I-130 touched: 2008-05-09

I-129F approved 2008-09-05

I-130 approved 2008-09-05

NVC received 2008-09-12

Pay I-864 2008-10-08

Pay IV bill 2008-10-08

Receive Instruction 2008-11-05

Case Complete 2008-11-18

Medical 2009-01-19/20 passed

Receive Pkt 4 2009-01-30

Interview 221g 2009-02-23

Second interview 2009-03-02 Approved

POE DFW 2009-03-07

Received SS card 2009-03-17

Received GC 2009-04-01

Done for 3 years or 10 years. Haven't decided yet.

(I'm going for the IR-1 and blowing off the K-3. Even if it takes an extra couple months, it's worth it to not have to deal with USCIS again)

"Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, the wretched refuse of your teeming shore. Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me, I lift my lamp beside the golden door!"

Note:

Please fill out I-130, wait 6 months for approval, then 3 more months for an interview. (Unless of course we've bombed your country into the stone age, then you qualify for expedited processing.)

Welcome to the USA!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
payxibka Grand Master

payxibka   10,045

Posted
Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Philippines
 Timeline
Posted

USCIS put a 30 -60 deferral on the new I-9 requirements this past week. They are requesting additional comments

YMMV

Link to comment
Share on other sites
 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...