The Great California Fiscal Earthquake

[one...two...tree 2,762]

By Kristin Kloberdanz / Modesto

As 2009 settles in, California isn't quite the golden state anymore. School districts are expected to lose billions of dollars in financing for improvements and development; and healthcare services for the elderly, infirm and poor will likely deteriorate. State employees are facing payroll cuts, unpaid leaves and a hiring freeze. Money for firefighting in parched Southern California is drying up, as is financing for levees in flood-plagued northern environs of the state. And that's just for starters as California faces a budget deficit of more than $41 billion over the next 18 months. (See pictures of the aftermath of a California firestorm.)

It would help to have a budget, but state legislators have been at an impasse for weeks, haggling over various proposals — and weighing their political consequences. On New Year's Eve, the administration of Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger proposed a new budget plan that includes painfully deep spending cuts and $14 billion in tax increases. Although the proposal is not likely to be the one that finally passes, there is no doubt few Californians will be untouched by the fiscal crisis. In December, unable to wait for a budget solution any longer, the state preemptively canceled $3.8 billion for 2,000 public infrastructure projects such as new prisons, veterans' homes and highways.

The list of cuts and shortfalls is almost apocalyptic. According to the UCLA Anderson Forecast, thousands of lost jobs in the public and private sector will cause California's unemployment rate to leap to 8.5% by the end of 2009 (it was 6.5% in October). If the state runs out of cash by mid-February, as has been predicted, hundreds of state vendors, such as electrical supply wholesellers, food service companies and building and grounds maintenance firms, will be sent IOU's from the state government. Dependents may drop in worth from $309 to $103 on Californians' 2009 income tax forms. And, by the way, don't count on a tax refund showing up soon after filing in April — one of those IOUs may find its way to your mailbox instead, explaining that the refund may be delayed.

Even drowning one's sorrows may be difficult here in "fiscal Armageddon," as Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger has referred to the budget crisis: one of his solutions is a sizeable tax on booze. "At a time we should be investing for our unmet needs and stimulate the economy, we're going in the other direction," says California State Treasurer Bill Lockyer, a Democrat. "Every day, we go deeper in the hole."

California has found itself in this financial quagmire thanks to a perfect storm of events. "It really has been a combination of things that have created the monstrosity that we are now in," says Barbara O'Connor, director of the Institute for the Study of Politics and Media at Sacramento State University. She cites inflation, population growth and mandates (such as Proposition 13 which placed a limit on state property rate taxes, resulting in restrictions on increasing taxes) as having a snowball effect over the course of 30 years. Add these to California's extremely high foreclosure rate and a global recession (approximately one in four jobs in the state has international trade ties), and quickly the deficit adds up. In the past, the state would borrow or sell bonds to bridge the gap, but with the current credit crunch, few investors are willing to offer assistance.

Of course, the deficit is growing larger each day legislators struggle to come up with a solution. California is one of only a handful of states to require two-thirds majority vote in legislature to pass a state budget. The Democrats dominate both the Senate, 24 to 15, and the Assembly, 51 to 29. (There is one vacancy in the Senate.) With such deep cuts on the line, Republicans and Democrats have squared off, each arguing whether raising taxes or reducing welfare programs is the best way to go. In December, the Democrats engineered a plan that could bypass the Republican vote and, with a combination of cuts and sales, gas and income tax hikes, melt the deficit by $18 billion. However, this week Schwarzenegger rejected the plan — saying his demands such as limiting environmental protections on public works construction were not met — and the Republicans filed a suit in state appeals court in an effort to block this sort of majority-vote proposal from occurring again. The pressure is on for the parties to quickly come up with a working budget before the well runs dry in February. In the meantime, all this political feuding has left the state's citizens wondering when and exactly where the hammer will drop.

"The longer they go, it gets even more and more serious for all of us," says David Sanchez, president of the California Teachers Association (CTA). He is expecting schools to potentially take a $10 billion hit this year. Last month, the CTA filed its own initiative for a one cent sales tax increase earmarked solely for public schools and colleges, but Sanchez — like others in the state — says he will not know precisely how to budget for this upcoming year until a legislative solution is passed. "The unknown," he says, "is very scary."

http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,...1870299,00.html

[Ban Hammer 13,355]

someone had to pay for all those liberal projects. hey california residents, it's you!

[DEDixon 39]

Funny when people mention Prop 13 as the reason for budget deficits. It makes no sense at all. When states can't raise a tax or they don't have a certain tax (like some states don't have income tax), they simply get it from other sources. I'm sure, if one did the research, since prop 13 was passed, other taxes have increased to offset what prop 13 can no longer provide. A lot of countries have very very low property taxes so retirees can actually afford to retire in their homes on a little retirement income..... these countries often get their revenue through sales tax.

If anyone has ever been outside this country and window shopped for electronics, they often find that the price is 3 or 4 times what it costs in America. That additional price tag is all tax. Even clothes in say Brazil are outrageously expensive, but they have little to no property tax and income tax so they can afford clothes.

Prop 13 advocates can cry about Prop 13 until their dying days, because it is really hard to defend a tax which will force retirees (the elderly) to sell their home.

[DEDixon 39]

Quote: "California is one of only a handful of states to require two-thirds majority vote in legislature to pass a state budget."

In think the 2/3s requirement was added in 1973 and for good reason.... because without it Dems could pass any law they wanted in California, because they were and are always in the majority. Without the 2/3 requirements, Republicans may as well leave the state.

BTW, it also takes 2/3s majority to raise taxes.

[Pinocchio Liberal 268]

Where the he!! is Gray Davis? Arnie is so librul, I would think most of you would like him. Funny how when you get what you want the whinin just keeps om rollin!

[William33 110]

As an aside, Arnold is looking rather old these days.....

Interesting how high political positions tend to age you exponentially. Hanging chins, wrinkles and so forth.

[Dr. Obvious 49]

As an aside, Arnold is looking rather old these days.....

Well, he is 61 years old. No spring chicken anymore.

[Jasman0717 9]

I think California runs out of money next month. State employees will have to take IOUs again