Jump to content
Pete

IMBRA- Worst, Most Cruel Law Ever, or THE Worst Most Cruel Law Ever?

 Share

IMBRA - bad law? Or WORST EVER?  

53 members have voted

  1. 1. Does IMBRA and the people that wrote it suck?

    • Yes! One of the most moronic pieces of legislation ever.
      9
    • For Sure! Unparalled in its ability to destroy the lives of good people.
      3
    • No Doubt! Why do I deserve this additional delay to an already broken process?
      10
    • No! It is a fine law written by well intentioned but totally incompetent fools.
      18
    • This is a great law, it protects me from many imaginable risks. Oh and I believe in Santa Clause too!
      13


27 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Morocco
Timeline

Wow, you really put ALL the choices in there. I can see that you don't like IMBRA and that anyone who chooses that they agree with it is a fool? Interesting.

ps. Innocent until proven guilty- yes. However IMBRA is protecting people from coming to the US and marrying people who HAVE CRIMINAL RECORDS, meaning they could have been proven guilty. So they already had trouble, shouldn't their spouse know about it? I would be pretty upset not knowing if my fiance has a criminal history or not, he does not, but if he did and I didn't know until later that could get ugly.

Edited by sarah and hicham
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Argentina
Timeline

I second that. Something that has fascinated me all along is the display of hatred for this law, which ONLY helps in the long run for our country.

Having said that, I can though understand from where the hatred which ive witnessed manymany times in peoples threads for this law, i can understand it. Because of our individual situations and the hardships and heartache it has recently burdened us with, I feel it has clouded alot of judgement.

This law, for me, right now, because of my situation has become a HUGE pain in my ###. But, it is worth it in the long run.

Service Center : Vermont Service Center

Consulate : Buenos Aires, Argentina

I-129F Sent : 02-21-06

I-129F NOA1 : 03-14-06

I-129F NOA2 : 03-30-06

NVC Received : 04-06-06

Embassy to NVC: 05-31-06

Touched: 06-27-06

Case Re-opened: 06-27-06

Touched: 06-29-06

USCIS sent RFE: 06-29-06

Touched: 06-30-06

Touched: 07-03-06

IMBRA RFE recieved: 07-05-06

IMBRA RFE sent to USCIS: 08-10-06

USCIS recieved IMBRARFE 08-15-06

Touched: 08-16-06

Touched: 08-18-06

Touched: 08-23-06

Touched: 08-24-06

Touched: 08-29-06

USCIS RFE NOA in mail 09-01-06

Touched: 09-02-06

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Thailand
Timeline

doesn't affect me... so no opinion either way

K-1 Timeline

11-29-05: Mailed I-129F Petition to CSC

12-06-05: NOA1

03-02-06: NOA2

03-23-06: Interview Date May 16

05-17-06: K-1 Visa Issued

05-20-06: Arrived at POE, Honolulu

07-17-06: Married

AOS Timeline

08-14-06: Mailed I-485 to Chicago

08-24-06: NOA for I-485

09-08-06: Biometrics Appointment

09-25-06: I-485 transferred to CSC

09-28-06: I-485 received at CSC

10-18-06: AOS Approved

10-21-06: Approval notice mailed

10-23-06: Received "Welcome Letter"

10-27-06: Received 2 yr Green Card

I-751 Timeline

07-21-08: Mailed I-751 to VSC

07-25-08: NOA for I-751

08-27-08: Biometrics Appointment

02-25-09: I-751 transferred to CSC

04-17-09: I-751 Approved

06-22-09: Received 10 yr Green Card

N-400 Timeline

07-20-09: Mailed N-400 to Lewisville, TX

07-23-09: NOA for N-400

08-14-09: Biometrics Appointment

09-08-09: Interview Date Oct 07

10-30-09: Oath Ceremony

11-20-09: Received Passport!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Scotland
Timeline
Enjoy!

As the non USC I already have to provide information similar to that asked for of USC's by IMBRA.

I certainly have no problem with the idea that my fiance should also disclose his past record, as it happens neither of us have anything to declare and we both have shared everything with each other.

While the implementation of IMBRA has been a mess the change is not a bad thing, I know it will delay our K1 as we will be filing in the midst of the backlog but I'M not going to whine about a law that will protect vulnerable foreign spouses from potentially abusive partners. Those people who are not potential abusers have nothing to worry about as they will have nothing to fear from the extra questions.

K-1 Visa

Event Date

Service Center : Vermont Service Center

Consulate : London, United Kingdom

I-129F Sent : 2006-09-26

I-129F NOA1 : 2006-09-28

I-129F RFE(s) :

RFE Reply(s) :

I-129F NOA2 : 2006-10-18

NVC Received : 2006-10-20

NVC Left : 2006-10-23

Consulate Received :

Packet 3 Received : 2006-11-06

Packet 3 Sent : 2006-12-02

Packet 4 Received : 2006-12-07

Interview Date : 2007-01-31

Visa Received : 2007-02-03

US Entry : 2007-03-06

Marriage : 2007-03-30

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Timeline

Hmm...ok, so those of us that agree with IMBRA are idiots? ;):rolleyes: From what I've read, I don't see anything wrong with IMBRA. True, it may cause some delays but if it prevents a fiance/spouse from being taken advantage of by a dishonest person then I don't see what the big problem is. I can understand why someone with a record wouldn't like it, but why would anyone else mind?

November 18, 2005 - Visa in hand! (Day 184)

December 19th - Vipul arrives in US

March 22, 2006 - Applied for AOS, EAD, and AP

June 6, 2006 - AP approved

June 9, 2006 - EAD approved

Feb. 5, 2007 - Becomes permanent resident

Dec. 9, 2008 - Filed I-751 to remove conditions

February 2009 - Conditions Removed - Next step Naturalization

November 19, 2009 - Filed for Naturalization!

dsc01090fw8.th.jpg

B2zLm5.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Country: Canada
Timeline
Hmm...ok, so those of us that agree with IMBRA are idiots? ;):rolleyes: From what I've read, I don't see anything wrong with IMBRA. True, it may cause some delays but if it prevents a fiance/spouse from being taken advantage of by a dishonest person then I don't see what the big problem is. I can understand why someone with a record wouldn't like it, but why would anyone else mind?

I agree with the law....and even if it applied to us I would still agree with it. Yes it DOES delay things. But I would rather there be a delay and a man or woman prevented from being possibly abused than for the unmentionable to happen. I've been in an abusive marriage...to an american. I think there should be a way to investigate men and women here as well when an american wants to marry an american. I believe if this had been possible I wouldn't have been abused at the hands of my "ultra religious" ex husband.

So (in my humble opinion) if you don't have anything to hide, be glad for this law.

Teaching is the essential profession...the one that makes ALL other professions possible - David Haselkorn

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you forgot "Yes! Because I wanted to marry some unsuspecting woman from a poor country and abuse the $*** out of her!"

Seriously, I think it sucks that they were incompetent about it, and I do have some concerns about civil rights issues maybe (are they going to deny visas if the *USC* has a criminal record? when the only requirement to sponsoring your fiancé(e) is supposed to be US citizenship and being free to marry?), but overall the idea is to protect foreign spouses from being abused.

I'll be interested to see if the people who oppose IMBRA are the same ones who favor the NSA's warrantless domestic spying. They don't mind the government interfering in their lives illegally (read the Fourth Amendment, folks) if it doesn't cause interference, but God forbid that *legal* interference should inconvenience them at all.

Bethany (NJ, USA) & Gareth (Scotland, UK)

-----------------------------------------------

01 Nov 2007: N-400 FedEx'd to TSC

05 Nov 2007: NOA-1 Date

28 Dec 2007: Check cashed

05 Jan 2008: NOA-1 Received

02 Feb 2008: Biometrics notice received

23 Feb 2008: Biometrics at Albuquerque ASC

12 Jun 2008: Interview letter received

12 Aug 2008: Interview at Albuquerque DO--PASSED!

15 Aug 2008: Oath Ceremony

-----------------------------------------------

Any information, opinions, etc., given by me are based entirely on personal experience, observations, research common sense, and an insanely accurate memory; and are not in any way meant to constitute (1) legal advice nor (2) the official policies/advice of my employer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

?

Aapki Nazroan Ne Samjha, Pyaar Ke Kabil Mujhe

Dil Ki Ai Dharkan Thaher Ja, Mil Gayee Manzil Mujhe

I-130 Process

01-29-2006 | Marriage

02-13-2006 | Mailed to NSC

02-27-2006 | NOA1

06-15-2006 | I-130 Approved

I-129F Process

03-08-2006 | Mailed to CHICAGO LOCKBOX

03-13-2006 | NOA1

07-31-2006 | I-129F Approved

09-01-2006 | K3 Interview, Visa Approved

09-14-2006 | Passport recieved from Consulate

01-23-2007 | POE at Chicago

AOS process

07-25-2007 | Mailed to CHICAGO LOCKBOX

08-30-2007 | NOA1

09-07-2007 | Biometrics Appointment

01-28-2008 | AOS interview-More evidence requested

02-07-2008 | AOS approved

02-19-2008 | Recieved Green Card in mail

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMBRA is a necessary law. Poorly thought out and implemented, yes... but necessary.

I have to agree with someone else who said the only people who don't like it are criminals with something to hide.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Brazil
Timeline

What? Santa Claus doesn't exist??? Are you serious? :lol:chimneysanta.gif

Wow, you really put ALL the choices in there. I can see that you don't like IMBRA and that anyone who chooses that they agree with it is a fool? Interesting.

ps. Innocent until proven guilty- yes. However IMBRA is protecting people from coming to the US and marrying people who HAVE CRIMINAL RECORDS, meaning they could have been proven guilty. So they already had trouble, shouldn't their spouse know about it? I would be pretty upset not knowing if my fiance has a criminal history or not, he does not, but if he did and I didn't know until later that could get ugly.

:thumbs: I would be pissed too. I know IMBRA is affecting us, altho we didn't meet through a marriage broker, but it is delaying our petition and IT SUCKS, but I also agree it's something that should be done, bad timing for all of us with the current process, but something that has to be done and it will help a lot of people in the future.



* K1 Timeline *
* 04/07/06: I-129F Sent to NSC
* 10/02/06: Interview date - APPROVED!
* 10/10/06: POE Houston
* 11/25/06: Wedding day!!!

* AOS/EAD/AP Timeline *
*01/05/07: AOS/EAD/AP sent
*02/19/08: AOS approved
*02/27/08: Permanent Resident Card received

* LOC Timeline *
*12/31/09: Applied Lifting of Condition
*01/04/10: NOA
*02/12/10: Biometrics
*03/03/10: LOC approved
*03/11/10: 10 years green card received

* Naturalization Timeline *
*12/17/10: package sent
*12/29/10: NOA date
*01/19/11: biometrics
*04/12/11: interview
*04/15/11: approval letter
*05/13/11: Oath Ceremony - Officially done with Immigration.

Complete Timeline

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...