heather poole or laurel scott

[london1 0]

whos better heather poole or laurel scott

[YuAndDan 153]

Are you talking about immigrations lawyers???

You may want to give background details in your posted question.

Sometimes I dislike wordy questions, and think lets get to the point, but this question is NOT wordy enough, give me a clue please!

Edited December 6, 2008 by YuAndDan

[london1 0]

yeah its regarding immigration lawyer.

iam inadmissible due to a conviction. i need to file a waiver. i had a consultation with both of them and i cant decide who to choose to file my waiver

Are you talking about immigrations lawyers???

You may want to give background details in your posted question.

Sometimes I dislike wordy questions, and think lets get to the point, but this question is NOT wordy enough, give me a clue please!

[spookyturtle 9,465]

yeah its regarding immigration lawyer.

iam inadmissible due to a conviction. i need to file a waiver. i had a consultation with both of them and i cant decide who to choose to file my waiver

Are you talking about immigrations lawyers???

You may want to give background details in your posted question.

Sometimes I dislike wordy questions, and think lets get to the point, but this question is NOT wordy enough, give me a clue please!

They are both first rate. Personally, I would probably go with Laurel, her practice is based on waivers and she started her practice doing waivers only. What is your gut feeling? Who did you like talking to the best? Did they both give you the same assessment of your case? I don't think there is a wrong choice with either one of them. What are you thinking?

[london1 0]

im thinking to go with heather pool

wgat do u think i shall do

yeah its regarding immigration lawyer.

iam inadmissible due to a conviction. i need to file a waiver. i had a consultation with both of them and i cant decide who to choose to file my waiver

Are you talking about immigrations lawyers???

You may want to give background details in your posted question.

Sometimes I dislike wordy questions, and think lets get to the point, but this question is NOT wordy enough, give me a clue please!

They are both first rate. Personally, I would probably go with Laurel, her practice is based on waivers and she started her practice doing waivers only. What is your gut feeling? Who did you like talking to the best? Did they both give you the same assessment of your case? I don't think there is a wrong choice with either one of them. What are you thinking?

[spookyturtle 9,465]

I would go with whoever you are comfortable with. They are both good. I gave my reasons above for Laurel and that is not a knock against Heather at all. I respect Heather's honesty. When I contacted her, she gave me her take on my case and suggested that I get a second opinion from Laurel Scott. So I really appreciated her honesty. If you are more comfortable with Heather, then go for it. They both have a good reputation over at immigrate2us.net, but Laurel has handled more cases from those forum members than Heather. It's all personal preference. The are both honest and tell it like it is. I don't think there is a wrong choice with either of them. If you want another opinion, check out Carl Shusterman at shusterman.com.

[Ta Ta 1]

Both are good. I had a consult with both and decided to go with Michael Davis , he is very good as well and not quiet as high in fees.

I picked through about 40 attorneys, so I did my homework. But since each case is different just sleep on it and go with your gut after the research.