Jump to content
MARM

Illegal Interview Questions?

 Share

17 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

I remember reading somewhere on this forum (or was it another forum... :wacko: ) that there are questions that are illegal for the consular/interviewer to ask the fiance/fiancee applying for the K-1/K-3 visa. Anyone know what questions are considered "illegal"?

Edited by MARM

Visa Journey completed, but we are still here to provide support! :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
Anyone know what questions are considered "illegal"?
In a K-1 interview, it is borderline (or actual) harassment for the consul or his/her Foreign Service National goons to ask about a couple's sex life, and even worse to insist on answers. Such questions are illegal in government and in the private sector. The interviewer should be told this, and something akin to "What other subjects do you wish to inquire about?" added.

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Country: United Kingdom
Timeline
Anyone know what questions are considered "illegal"?
In a K-1 interview, it is borderline (or actual) harassment for the consul or his/her Foreign Service National goons to ask about a couple's sex life, and even worse to insist on answers. Such questions are illegal in government and in the private sector. The interviewer should be told this, and something akin to "What other subjects do you wish to inquire about?" added.

:o

i'd hope that no one would ask me a question like that! does this mean that someone has actually experienced this..?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Country: China
Timeline
Anyone know what questions are considered "illegal"?
In a K-1 interview, it is borderline (or actual) harassment for the consul or his/her Foreign Service National goons to ask about a couple's sex life, and even worse to insist on answers. Such questions are illegal in government and in the private sector. The interviewer should be told this, and something akin to "What other subjects do you wish to inquire about?" added.

:o

i'd hope that no one would ask me a question like that! does this mean that someone has actually experienced this..?

Yes and such questions are legal and are sometimes (rarely) asked in appropriate circumstances. Consular officers abroad are not forbidden to ask questions that would get a government employee disciplined or fired when dealing with Citizens or co-workers.

Generally such questions are only asked when an assertion has been made. Sexual relations are not a requirement in a bona fide relationship, certainly for a fiance(e) but not even for husband and wife but if you assert you're having such relations and the CO has reason to doubt you're telling the truth, they are allowed to pursue a line of questioning to determine the truth. It's a visa interview not a job interview.

Edited by pushbrk

Facts are cheap...knowing how to use them is precious...
Understanding the big picture is priceless. Anonymous

Google Who is Pushbrk?

A Warning to Green Card Holders About Voting

http://www.visajourney.com/forums/topic/606646-a-warning-to-green-card-holders-about-voting/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It may make a person uncomfortable, but the CO is trying to determine based on limited info whether this is a true romantic/love relationship - not fraud. It is a priviledge to the USC to petition for a foreign spouse/finance. Interviewing the petitioner and beneficiary separately is one method to review the visa request - and used in some consulates/cases.

We were asked what type of contraceptive we used during our first sexual relationships, and whether we had had sex the previous day.

There is a true story of a man trying to bring his wife from the Dominican Republic. They were interviewed separately and asked when they first had sex. He truthfully answered, after their third date. She, modestly lied, after they were married. Their visa was denied and they have had to start all over.

We are all adults, we all have sex -- they aren't asking what position you prefer ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Country: China
Timeline

Along this line of thought, I had an interesting conversation with a Special Agent of the State Department's Diplomatic Security Service Sunday evening. It didn't cover topics of purient interest but we did go into visa fraud and passport fraud investigation techniques and procedures. It was more information on "background" than any details to post here.

I'll add that I've heard of a lot more instances of "intimate" questions coming from USCIS adjudicators in AOS cases than Consular Officers in visa cases.

Facts are cheap...knowing how to use them is precious...
Understanding the big picture is priceless. Anonymous

Google Who is Pushbrk?

A Warning to Green Card Holders About Voting

http://www.visajourney.com/forums/topic/606646-a-warning-to-green-card-holders-about-voting/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone know what questions are considered "illegal"?
In a K-1 interview, it is borderline (or actual) harassment for the consul or his/her Foreign Service National goons to ask about a couple's sex life, and even worse to insist on answers. Such questions are illegal in government and in the private sector. The interviewer should be told this, and something akin to "What other subjects do you wish to inquire about?" added.

:o

i'd hope that no one would ask me a question like that! does this mean that someone has actually experienced this..?

Yes and such questions are legal and are sometimes (rarely) asked in appropriate circumstances. Consular officers abroad are not forbidden to ask questions that would get a government employee disciplined or fired when dealing with Citizens or co-workers.

Generally such questions are only asked when an assertion has been made. Sexual relations are not a requirement in a bona fide relationship, certainly for a fiance(e) but not even for husband and wife but if you assert you're having such relations and the CO has reason to doubt you're telling the truth, they are allowed to pursue a line of questioning to determine the truth. It's a visa interview not a job interview.

You mention that "Consular officers abroad are not forbidden to ask questions that would get a government employee disciplined or fired when dealing with Citizens or co-workers."

Consular officers are government employees, so would they be disciplined/fired if they ask such questions in appropriate circumstances? Or are they the exception to the rule? What I mean to say is, if consular officers resorted to asking such questions if they felt they had to, no action would be taken against them by the government? They would not face any action because of asking such questions?

Visa Journey completed, but we are still here to provide support! :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Country: China
Timeline
Anyone know what questions are considered "illegal"?
In a K-1 interview, it is borderline (or actual) harassment for the consul or his/her Foreign Service National goons to ask about a couple's sex life, and even worse to insist on answers. Such questions are illegal in government and in the private sector. The interviewer should be told this, and something akin to "What other subjects do you wish to inquire about?" added.

:o

i'd hope that no one would ask me a question like that! does this mean that someone has actually experienced this..?

Yes and such questions are legal and are sometimes (rarely) asked in appropriate circumstances. Consular officers abroad are not forbidden to ask questions that would get a government employee disciplined or fired when dealing with Citizens or co-workers.

Generally such questions are only asked when an assertion has been made. Sexual relations are not a requirement in a bona fide relationship, certainly for a fiance(e) but not even for husband and wife but if you assert you're having such relations and the CO has reason to doubt you're telling the truth, they are allowed to pursue a line of questioning to determine the truth. It's a visa interview not a job interview.

You mention that "Consular officers abroad are not forbidden to ask questions that would get a government employee disciplined or fired when dealing with Citizens or co-workers."

Consular officers are government employees, so would they be disciplined/fired if they ask such questions in appropriate circumstances? Or are they the exception to the rule? What I mean to say is, if consular officers resorted to asking such questions if they felt they had to, no action would be taken against them by the government? They would not face any action because of asking such questions?

Yes, laws and regulations apply in combination with context and circumstances. For instance, a police officer is certainly within the law to ask about sexual relationships or even details of genital appearance, within the perfomance of their duties. The same goes for all investigatory functions while performing "law enforcement" (including immigration law) duties. Material misrepresentations to a USCIS adjudicator or Consular Officer are "crimes". As such, those officials are allowed to "interogate" suspected criminals, as needed.

You get a ticket for driving 20 MPH over the limit but the officer doing his duty catching you does not.

Facts are cheap...knowing how to use them is precious...
Understanding the big picture is priceless. Anonymous

Google Who is Pushbrk?

A Warning to Green Card Holders About Voting

http://www.visajourney.com/forums/topic/606646-a-warning-to-green-card-holders-about-voting/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone know what questions are considered "illegal"?
In a K-1 interview, it is borderline (or actual) harassment for the consul or his/her Foreign Service National goons to ask about a couple's sex life, and even worse to insist on answers. Such questions are illegal in government and in the private sector. The interviewer should be told this, and something akin to "What other subjects do you wish to inquire about?" added.

:o

i'd hope that no one would ask me a question like that! does this mean that someone has actually experienced this..?

Yes and such questions are legal and are sometimes (rarely) asked in appropriate circumstances. Consular officers abroad are not forbidden to ask questions that would get a government employee disciplined or fired when dealing with Citizens or co-workers.

Generally such questions are only asked when an assertion has been made. Sexual relations are not a requirement in a bona fide relationship, certainly for a fiance(e) but not even for husband and wife but if you assert you're having such relations and the CO has reason to doubt you're telling the truth, they are allowed to pursue a line of questioning to determine the truth. It's a visa interview not a job interview.

You mention that "Consular officers abroad are not forbidden to ask questions that would get a government employee disciplined or fired when dealing with Citizens or co-workers."

Consular officers are government employees, so would they be disciplined/fired if they ask such questions in appropriate circumstances? Or are they the exception to the rule? What I mean to say is, if consular officers resorted to asking such questions if they felt they had to, no action would be taken against them by the government? They would not face any action because of asking such questions?

Yes, laws and regulations apply in combination with context and circumstances. For instance, a police officer is certainly within the law to ask about sexual relationships or even details of genital appearance, within the perfomance of their duties. The same goes for all investigatory functions while performing "law enforcement" (including immigration law) duties. Material misrepresentations to a USCIS adjudicator or Consular Officer are "crimes". As such, those officials are allowed to "interogate" suspected criminals, as needed.

You get a ticket for driving 20 MPH over the limit but the officer doing his duty catching you does not.

Ok got it, so unless you give the consular a reason to investigate and ask such questions, they will not ask them.

Visa Journey completed, but we are still here to provide support! :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline
The key is to be truthful with every answer and not fall into that trap. Its easier to look through the truth for the COs too coz then there is consistancy in your answers and they will not be pushed to ask very uncomfortable answers. Trust me, the questions they are 'legally allowed' to ask can be a lot more uncomfortable than the 'illegal' ones if someone is lying.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Philippines
Timeline
It may make a person uncomfortable, but the CO is trying to determine based on limited info whether this is a true romantic/love relationship - not fraud. It is a priviledge to the USC to petition for a foreign spouse/finance. Interviewing the petitioner and beneficiary separately is one method to review the visa request - and used in some consulates/cases.

We were asked what type of contraceptive we used during our first sexual relationships, and whether we had had sex the previous day.

There is a true story of a man trying to bring his wife from the Dominican Republic. They were interviewed separately and asked when they first had sex. He truthfully answered, after their third date. She, modestly lied, after they were married. Their visa was denied and they have had to start all over.

We are all adults, we all have sex -- they aren't asking what position you prefer ;)

This sort of questioning never crossed my mind. Im not the shy type and if I'm ever questioned about it. I would give my honest answer and add a little something to that answer. e.g. yes, and we did it doggy sytle.

qip3dmkzd14e.png

01/05/12 - Mailed I-751, Petition to Remove Conditions.

01/09/12 - Petiton arrived us VSC.

11/15/12 - Wife Received ten year PR Card.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Country: China
Timeline
Ok got it, so unless you give the consular a reason to investigate and ask such questions, they will not ask them.

Pretty much, yes. Be aware though, that you may give a reason without intending to. You don't determine whether you did or didn't. They do.

Facts are cheap...knowing how to use them is precious...
Understanding the big picture is priceless. Anonymous

Google Who is Pushbrk?

A Warning to Green Card Holders About Voting

http://www.visajourney.com/forums/topic/606646-a-warning-to-green-card-holders-about-voting/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Ecuador
Timeline
i'd hope that no one would ask me a question like that! does this mean that someone has actually experienced this..?
Yes -- at least two K-1 couples, and almost certainly more, at the rogue Guayaquil consulate.
but if you assert you're having such relations and the CO has reason to doubt you're telling the truth, they are allowed to pursue a line of questioning to determine the truth. It's a visa interview not a job interview.
I concede to the excellent Pushbrk that this is almost certainly accurate in general, but it did not apply in the cases of the two couples mentioned above. Furthermore, the questions were asked by a Foreign Service National (not by any U.S. official) during Stokes interrogations (which had been advertised as "joint" "marriage" interviews).
You mention that "Consular officers abroad are not forbidden to ask questions that would get a government employee disciplined or fired when dealing with Citizens or co-workers." Consular officers are government employees, so would they be disciplined/fired if they ask such questions in appropriate circumstances? Or are they the exception to the rule? What I mean to say is, if consular officers resorted to asking such questions if they felt they had to, no action would be taken against them by the government? They would not face any action because of asking such questions?
Yes, laws and regulations apply in combination with context and circumstances. For instance, a police officer is certainly within the law to ask about sexual relationships or even details of genital appearance, within the perfomance of their duties. The same goes for all investigatory functions while performing "law enforcement" (including immigration law) duties. Material misrepresentations to a USCIS adjudicator or Consular Officer are "crimes". As such, those officials are allowed to "interogate" suspected criminals, as needed.
I have been advised by three former consular officers -- two of whom are immigration attorneys in active practice -- to file an after-visa complaint with the Department of State and with the Consul General regarding the treatment before, during, and after our so-called "interviews."
Ok got it, so unless you give the consular a reason to investigate and ask such questions, they will not ask them.
Nothing is ever 100% in business, medicine, or government, except that all consular interviewers are behind Plexiglass. Edited by TBoneTX

06-04-2007 = TSC stamps postal return-receipt for I-129f.

06-11-2007 = NOA1 date (unknown to me).

07-20-2007 = Phoned Immigration Officer; got WAC#; where's NOA1?

09-25-2007 = Touch (first-ever).

09-28-2007 = NOA1, 23 days after their 45-day promise to send it (grrrr).

10-20 & 11-14-2007 = Phoned ImmOffs; "still pending."

12-11-2007 = 180 days; file is "between workstations, may be early Jan."; touches 12/11 & 12/12.

12-18-2007 = Call; file is with Division 9 ofcr. (bckgrnd check); e-prompt to shake it; touch.

12-19-2007 = NOA2 by e-mail & web, dated 12-18-07 (187 days; 201 per VJ); in mail 12/24/07.

01-09-2008 = File from USCIS to NVC, 1-4-08; NVC creates file, 1/15/08; to consulate 1/16/08.

01-23-2008 = Consulate gets file; outdated Packet 4 mailed to fiancee 1/27/08; rec'd 3/3/08.

04-29-2008 = Fiancee's 4-min. consular interview, 8:30 a.m.; much evidence brought but not allowed to be presented (consul: "More proof! Second interview! Bring your fiance!").

05-05-2008 = Infuriating $12 call to non-English-speaking consulate appointment-setter.

05-06-2008 = Better $12 call to English-speaker; "joint" interview date 6/30/08 (my selection).

06-30-2008 = Stokes Interrogations w/Ecuadorian (not USC); "wait 2 weeks; we'll mail her."

07-2008 = Daily calls to DOS: "currently processing"; 8/05 = Phoned consulate, got Section Chief; wrote him.

08-07-08 = E-mail from consulate, promising to issue visa "as soon as we get her passport" (on 8/12, per DHL).

08-27-08 = Phoned consulate (they "couldn't find" our file); visa DHL'd 8/28; in hand 9/1; through POE on 10/9 with NO hassles(!).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...
Filed: K-1 Visa Country: China
Timeline

US Consular officials can do as they please. You have the right to complain about abuse. They have the right to deny your visa and send it back to USCIS or to keep it in purgatory at the Consular level indefinitely with no Congressman or Senator able to do anything about it. So, do you still wish to complain? Your choice. If you wish to complain, you may contact the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) for the Department of State. However, the same Consular Official you are complaining about may very well be the one eventually reviewing your case the second or third time ... after you have submitted RFEs until eventually all your paperwork is expired.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...