"Whites" need only apply!

[Peikko 1,575]

The stuart Smalleys of the 70s and 80s feeling bad about themselves and rightly soo, instead of accepting wrong and changing, went to therapists who said accept your self as who you are ie no acountability, they took to the streets and bonded (these perverse ideas and deeds) and banded together in parades and social and therapy notes and "coming out". Now older they want to promote it to our youth as the norm, mean while us in healthcare have to deal with the 20 something year olds with blown out o rings and colostomies, teenagers discovery of reverse perilstasis with things getting buried up in the rectum. Soo someonne explain while this is acceptable nature..Or better yet PLEASE DONT because it is against nature and tearing up youth. no wonder so many anger suicidal teenagers out there soo confused and alientated they all need some right guidance and plan for future. and Lesbians, wow some major psycho fights and batttles with these relationships..where is the balance ...

The gist of this post is that there are too many teens being physically and psycologically damaged because they are 'experimenting' with homosexual sex.

The cause - effect conclusions drawn by this poster are extremely dodgy up to and including the 'stuff buried up the rectum' scare seeing as there are plenty of hetrosexual couples that enjoy ####### sex - or so I am told:)

I am sure though, that ER's are hotbeds of horror stories

[rocks 494]

The stuart Smalleys of the 70s and 80s feeling bad about themselves and rightly soo, instead of accepting wrong and changing, went to therapists who said accept your self as who you are ie no acountability, they took to the streets and bonded (these perverse ideas and deeds) and banded together in parades and social and therapy notes and "coming out". Now older they want to promote it to our youth as the norm, mean while us in healthcare have to deal with the 20 something year olds with blown out o rings and colostomies, teenagers discovery of reverse perilstasis with things getting buried up in the rectum. Soo someonne explain while this is acceptable nature..Or better yet PLEASE DONT because it is against nature and tearing up youth. no wonder so many anger suicidal teenagers out there soo confused and alientated they all need some right guidance and plan for future. and Lesbians, wow some major psycho fights and batttles with these relationships..where is the balance ...

The gist of this post is that there are too many teens being physically and psycologically damaged because they are 'experimenting' with homosexual sex.

The cause - effect conclusions drawn by this poster are extremely dodgy up to and including the 'stuff buried up the rectum' scare seeing as there are plenty of hetrosexual couples that enjoy ####### sex - or so I am told:)

I am sure though, that ER's are hotbeds of horror stories

i don't see how someone who says something as outrageous as "things getting buried up in the rectum" can be taken seriously...

[Peikko 1,575]

That and the idea that 'homosexuality' is born of the era of the 60's - I guess the historical context only begins in the 1800's or there abouts. Somewhat 'Victorian' if you will.

[Danno 1,228]

Hold on, we never clarified who would be in favor of the State adopting out kids to

Transvestites or other such confused persons>?

[Danno 1,228]

That and the idea that 'homosexuality' is born of the era of the 60's - I guess the historical context only begins in the 1800's or there abouts. Somewhat 'Victorian' if you will.

Actually I thought the suggestion was; that Gays first started trying to convince themselves and others homosexuality was "normal" during this period in time.

I think everyone knows Homosexuality has been around a long, long time.

[HAL 9000 96]

Hold on, we never clarified who would be in favor of the State adopting out kids to

Transvestites or other such confused persons>?

And hold on, that is OTT and not established in any reasonable logic beyond your own take on the matter.

[Chica Yeyé 41]

Hold on, we never clarified who would be in favor of the State adopting out kids to

Transvestites or other such confused persons>?

And who told you transgendered individuals are confused? Read up Danno, your ignorance about sexual identities is showing.

And I answered I'm all for finding children a loving home.

Edited November 24, 2008 by *Len*

[HAL 9000 96]

Hold on, we never clarified who would be in favor of the State adopting out kids to

Transvestites or other such confused persons>?

And who told you transgendered individuals are confused? Read up Danno, your ignorance about sexual identities is showing.

And I answered I'm all for finding children a loving home.

And I second that.

Funny I remember seeing a McCain/Palin sticker on the car of the last gay couple I saw that had an adopted child.

[Danno 1,228]

Hold on, we never clarified who would be in favor of the State adopting out kids to

Transvestites or other such confused persons>?

And hold on, that is OTT and not established in any reasonable logic beyond your own take on the matter.

At least LEN had the courage to answer the question.

Being a "lib" is bad enough but a "spineless Lib" is more than I can bare.

[rocks 494]

Hold on, we never clarified who would be in favor of the State adopting out kids to

Transvestites or other such confused persons>?

And who told you transgendered individuals are confused? Read up Danno, your ignorance about sexual identities is showing.

And I answered I'm all for finding children a loving home.

exactly. a life with loving parent(s) is something that everyone deserves. there are very strict rules about adopting children and if someone fits then why should they be refused based on that? they would not be a "confused" person as they would have been vetted...

[Chica Yeyé 41]

Hold on, we never clarified who would be in favor of the State adopting out kids to

Transvestites or other such confused persons>?

And hold on, that is OTT and not established in any reasonable logic beyond your own take on the matter.

At least LEN had the courage to answer the question.

Being a "lib" is bad enough but a "spineless Lib" is more than I can bare.

Now would you care answering my question? Who told you or where did you get the idea that transgendered people are "confused persons"? thanks.

[HAL 9000 96]

Hold on, we never clarified who would be in favor of the State adopting out kids to

Transvestites or other such confused persons>?

And hold on, that is OTT and not established in any reasonable logic beyond your own take on the matter.

At least LEN had the courage to answer the question.

Being a "lib" is bad enough but a "spineless Lib" is more than I can bare.

Read my previous posts.

Talking about a spine, not that it matters since I can't ID any spineless people here, but its better to be spineless than brainless.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Its not really our business making wide-ranging assumptions about other people's lives and psychologies.

[HAL 9000 96]

Hold on, we never clarified who would be in favor of the State adopting out kids to

Transvestites or other such confused persons>?

And who told you transgendered individuals are confused? Read up Danno, your ignorance about sexual identities is showing.

And I answered I'm all for finding children a loving home.

exactly. a life with loving parent(s) is something that everyone deserves. there are very strict rules about adopting children and if someone fits then why should they be refused based on that? they would not be a "confused" person as they would have been vetted...

Apparently, to some folks that doesn't exist. Children are magically adopted by homosexual households and automatically become raging homosexuals themselves.

[HAL 9000 96]

Hold on, we never clarified who would be in favor of the State adopting out kids to

Transvestites or other such confused persons>?

And hold on, that is OTT and not established in any reasonable logic beyond your own take on the matter.

At least LEN had the courage to answer the question.

Being a "lib" is bad enough but a "spineless Lib" is more than I can bare.

Now would you care answering my question? Who told you or where did you get the idea that transgendered people are "confused persons"? thanks.

That's called making an ignorant assumption. Something common to a certain demographic that is quite universal- and its perhaps only a coincidence that its more predominant in one political idiocy than in others. Although that is not set in stone.

It always needs to be simplified for these people, although they readily ignore the issue repeatedly: its about equal rights for equal relationships.