Jump to content

432 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Country:
Timeline
Posted (edited)
[

By the way, you might want to consider, in the "link" you gave, that I'm not questioning bailing out Ford, nor suggesting Ford going down would be a good thing. They've actually showed the right kind of response to a shift in ideology about cars. GM had the first cut in this market and they took a sh*t on it. So they don't get my sympathy.

So you want to save Ford and not GM? You remind me of Senator Kerry, always changing your view.

Notice how I haven't really addressed Ford much in this topic? Probably because this topic is about GM, not Ford.

And yes, if the post wasn't clear enough for you, Ford has actually addressed consumer demand for hybrids and alternative fuels. If you've been following along, I've also expressed praise for one of their hybrid SUV's, as well as suggested the likelihood of us getting that over a Lexus RX hybrid.

But I doubt reading is your thing. Well, reading things you don't want to read..

Edited by SRVT
  • Replies 431
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Filed: Other Country: United Kingdom
Timeline
Posted
People will do what they please when given the option.

So... if you could buy a NON-gas-guzzling muscle car. At an affordable price... would you buy it?

Sure. That Tesla Roadster thing is pretty cool, though I hate the idea of having to plug it in to charge.

They are also close to $100K.

How would Hal use it in Chicago? Unfortunately Lithium batteries don't work well in cold weather and downright fail and explode in hot weather.

HAL 9000 has Discovery.

Cast off all lines, Capt HAL!!! :thumbs:

Ah yes... that would be Discovery S (for sail). Discovery the starship has new cold fusion engines.

Working on a smaller version for sailboats and even cars so wankers with inferiority complexes, muscle car freaks, and nerds can all enjoy unlimited motion from whatever point they start to wherever they want to end their journeys.

Discovery is so 1968 ;)

Country:
Timeline
Posted
Dude you hate GM because you are sad about the EV1. Get over it geeezz.

Actually, I don't want to bail out GM for the incompetency in their decision making process. I actually use the "conservative" mindset of not rewarding failure. Funny how conservatives here disagree with me on this. :lol:

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Colombia
Timeline
Posted
[

By the way, you might want to consider, in the "link" you gave, that I'm not questioning bailing out Ford, nor suggesting Ford going down would be a good thing. They've actually showed the right kind of response to a shift in ideology about cars. GM had the first cut in this market and they took a sh*t on it. So they don't get my sympathy.

So you want to save Ford and not GM? You remind me of Senator Kerry, always changing your view.

Notice how I haven't really addressed Ford much in this topic? Probably because this topic is about GM, not Ford.

And yes, if the post wasn't clear enough for you, Ford has actually addressed consumer demand for hybrids and alternative fuels. If you've been following along, I've also expressed praise for one of their hybrid SUV's, as well as suggested the likelihood of us getting that over a Lexus RX hybrid.

But I doubt reading is your thing. Well, reading things you don't want to read..

Yes, you have.

Wishing you ten-fold that which you wish upon all others.

Posted
[

By the way, you might want to consider, in the "link" you gave, that I'm not questioning bailing out Ford, nor suggesting Ford going down would be a good thing. They've actually showed the right kind of response to a shift in ideology about cars. GM had the first cut in this market and they took a sh*t on it. So they don't get my sympathy.

So you want to save Ford and not GM? You remind me of Senator Kerry, always changing your view.

Notice how I haven't really addressed Ford much in this topic? Probably because this topic is about GM, not Ford.

And yes, if the post wasn't clear enough for you, Ford has actually addressed consumer demand for hybrids and alternative fuels. If you've been following along, I've also expressed praise for one of their hybrid SUV's, as well as suggested the likelihood of us getting that over a Lexus RX hybrid.

But I doubt reading is your thing. Well, reading things you don't want to read..

Why, you won't pay $15,000 more for the Lexus hybrid to get an extra 2mpg? It's a Toyota, so it must be worrth it. It's a good thing that you always keep things on topic.

R.I.P Spooky 2004-2015

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Colombia
Timeline
Posted
Dude you hate GM because you are sad about the EV1. Get over it geeezz.

Actually, I don't want to bail out GM for the incompetency in their decision making process. I actually use the "conservative" mindset of not rewarding failure. Funny how conservatives here disagree with me on this. :lol:

Save GM, scrap its management.

Wishing you ten-fold that which you wish upon all others.

Posted
Dude you hate GM because you are sad about the EV1. Get over it geeezz.

Actually, I don't want to bail out GM for the incompetency in their decision making process. I actually use the "conservative" mindset of not rewarding failure. Funny how conservatives here disagree with me on this. :lol:

Save GM, scrap its management.

and the UAW

According to the Internal Revenue Service, the 400 richest American households earned a total of $US138 billion, up from $US105 billion a year earlier. That's an average of $US345 million each, on which they paid a tax rate of just 16.6 per cent.

Country:
Timeline
Posted
Dude you hate GM because you are sad about the EV1. Get over it geeezz.

Actually, I don't want to bail out GM for the incompetency in their decision making process. I actually use the "conservative" mindset of not rewarding failure. Funny how conservatives here disagree with me on this. :lol:

Save GM, scrap its management.

Problem is, you know the cost of scrapping the management. While people can find other jobs, namely if Ford gets bailed out, it's them I don't want to see rewarded.

Good to see the discussion take an intelligent turn..

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Colombia
Timeline
Posted
Dude you hate GM because you are sad about the EV1. Get over it geeezz.

Actually, I don't want to bail out GM for the incompetency in their decision making process. I actually use the "conservative" mindset of not rewarding failure. Funny how conservatives here disagree with me on this. :lol:

Save GM, scrap its management.

and the UAW

UAW's management.

Wishing you ten-fold that which you wish upon all others.

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Colombia
Timeline
Posted
Dude you hate GM because you are sad about the EV1. Get over it geeezz.

Actually, I don't want to bail out GM for the incompetency in their decision making process. I actually use the "conservative" mindset of not rewarding failure. Funny how conservatives here disagree with me on this. :lol:

Save GM, scrap its management.

Problem is, you know the cost of scrapping the management. While people can find other jobs, namely if Ford gets bailed out, it's them I don't want to see rewarded.

Good to see the discussion take an intelligent turn..

I'd say promote from within from the lower ranks with one vision: make cars that people need, like, and do so as a service to the nation in exchange for corporate leadership and pay. Make profiteering important, but not the sole reason to make a car.

Wishing you ten-fold that which you wish upon all others.

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Colombia
Timeline
Posted

A marketing definition of a well designed vehicle is one that after hitting a certain mileage or time period, whichever comes first, the entire vehicle blasts away into dust, that also makes the EPA happy as they have a strong say on recycling, fresh vehicles off the line are already predetermined to be dismantled and recycled.

If any component is still usable after that predetermined point, it is over designed, and way too much money was spent on those components that could be used to feed the stockholders or the CEO. Those that failed before that point, well that's okay, as long as they failed after the warranty period, hey, we made a couple of bucks.

Vehicles are throwaway items and becoming more so each and every model year. Not much different than that aluminum can you are tossing away after taking a few sips of soda, except the grade of that aluminum in that can is much greater than what you will find in the AC components of even a BMW, Toyota, or Honda that rot away after the short one year warranty on these components, read your fine print. FDA and liability demands a high grade aluminum in a pop can, but no safety requirements in an AC system.

Yet another design factor is the amount of energy required to manufacture an automobile, and basically all fossil fuels at this point. A missing part of the green movement is considering the amount of energy used to add say a hybrid system as opposed to the amount of energy it saves with this technology. But that energy cost is recovered the instant the vehicle is sold, pays to calculate how much extra you are paying for that vehicle as opposed to how much money you are actually saving in fuel cost. Then you have to learn how to drive a hybrid, it only works if you can take your foot off the gas so the motor/generator can convert some of that stopping power to charge a very expensive added weight battery to that vehicle and use about 50% of that recovered energy to get you moving again. Ha, can save a lot more than that if you just drive through stop and red light traffic lights. But may experience a dent or two if not a traffic fine in the process.

Hybrids do permit a smaller engine as the motor portion of the motor/generator in series with the combustion engine gives that extra power when needed. And the generator portion does slowly recharge the battery especially when partial throttle is used going down a hill. Ever wonder why railroad tracks are limited to a 2% grade, you have your answer.

While the EPA downgraded the mileage estimates on the Prius, they sure in the hell didn't test these things on the Dan Ryan where if you don't slam hard on your brakes because some idiot flies in front of you, not recovering any inertia energy that way and you will be doing that over 50 times each mile. No savings in fuel that way, plus hauling that extra generator around and batteries. Should have asked a guy I know that is using Prius's in LV, only averaging around 28 mpg, plus can't carry the load as a larger vehicle, space is eaten up with motors and batteries. Plus the front tires are so thin to save on road traction, a hazard to drive in northern states, and if you hit the pedal a tad to much, will grind up those tires in a hurry. All in all, a very stupid design and concept, but hey, Gore says buy one, you will save the planet. Wonder how much Toyota is paying him?

Did I tell you my old man's Chevy is better than your old man's Ford? Haven't heard that since grade school. That's about the mentality that this thread is leading into. In reality, both cars are #######. Oh, and you better be nice, my daddy is a cop and is going to put you in jail.

Posted (edited)
Dude you hate GM because you are sad about the EV1. Get over it geeezz.

Actually, I don't want to bail out GM for the incompetency in their decision making process. I actually use the "conservative" mindset of not rewarding failure. Funny how conservatives here disagree with me on this. :lol:

Save GM, scrap its management.

and the UAW

UAW's management.

Unions = bankruptcy

This has played out over and over again in most heavily unionized industries. US airlines are a great example.

Edited by Aficionado

According to the Internal Revenue Service, the 400 richest American households earned a total of $US138 billion, up from $US105 billion a year earlier. That's an average of $US345 million each, on which they paid a tax rate of just 16.6 per cent.

Country:
Timeline
Posted
Dude you hate GM because you are sad about the EV1. Get over it geeezz.

Actually, I don't want to bail out GM for the incompetency in their decision making process. I actually use the "conservative" mindset of not rewarding failure. Funny how conservatives here disagree with me on this. :lol:

Save GM, scrap its management.

Problem is, you know the cost of scrapping the management. While people can find other jobs, namely if Ford gets bailed out, it's them I don't want to see rewarded.

Good to see the discussion take an intelligent turn..

I'd say promote from within from the lower ranks with one vision: make cars that people need, like, and do so as a service to the nation in exchange for corporate leadership and pay. Make profiteering important, but not the sole reason to make a car.

This all makes sense, and it's how things should work, but if GM gets bailed out do you really think this will happen?

The problem is bailing out GM does not fix any problems beyond "now". It just makes taxpayers have to foot more money at some point in the future. And people wonder why the economy and budget deficit is in the position it's in now?

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...