Palin raises taxes and redistributes wealth

[Marilyn. 340]

You dare to challenge the 'Loan Voice Of Reason'? Oh, but as it's you, all you'll get is a pat on the head and a 'but you admit you know nothing about politics so I will not hold that against you'.

yup, I guess I should just go back and sit in my corner like a good little girl.. ....

[rebeccajo 14]

how come you get to decide who is right or wrong?

I didn't realize that someone else had been appointed to do it for me.

Make that an 'anybody else'..............

[Sofiyya 1,687]

You dare to challenge the 'Loan Voice Of Reason'? Oh, but as it's you, all you'll get is a pat on the head and a 'but you admit you know nothing about politics so I will not hold that against you'.

I'm the Loan Voice of Reason, now? Well, no money for you!

[IAMX 3,055]

For Obama's plan, he has to take from my personal earnings to give more wealth to you that you didn't earn. I no longer own or control my private earnings, I don't hold on to my principle. I didn't vote to share with you, I have no say over how much you get, I have no equity or ownership in common with you, I gain nothing from this transaction between us, but you do. That's socialism. No matter how imaginative you are, that's not what they're doing in Alaska. But, I know you just like to argue.

Evidently if it's the people's property, why aren't they getting 100% of the earnings?

Maybe you didn't get it that things produced and distributed by the government (i.e. people collectively) IS.. SOCIALISM. This is what Palin is for.

Since you love to go on Obama about socialism, as well as plenty of other blind following McCain lovers, lets reiterate Palin's quote:

"We can afford to share resource wealth with Alaskans and to temporarily suspend the state fuel tax," she said at the time.

Last I checked, giving money to people who didn't earn it is not just socialism, but welfare. Not surprisingly, your outrage is 100% selective. Hence you get called out on your hypocrisy. Got you defending socialism right now.

You have been wrong so often, it's becoming a bad habit. Well, you can't be good at everything, and, as I said before, you just like to argue.

If only simply asserting someone was wrong was good enough..

[EstebanTrabajos 7]

Again, maybe somebody can take the hint

Denial is a defense mechanism postulated by Sigmund Freud, in which a person is faced with a fact that is too uncomfortable to accept and rejects it instead, insisting that it is not true despite what may be overwhelming evidence. [1] The subject may deny the reality of the unpleasant fact altogether (simple denial), admit the fact but deny its seriousness (minimisation) or admit both the fact and seriousness but deny responsibility (transference). The concept of denial is particularly important to the study of addiction. The theory of denial was first researched seriously by Anna Freud. She classified denial as a mechanism of the immature mind, because it conflicts with the ability to learn from and cope with reality.