Obama Campaign Takes the Fight to FOX

[Peikko 1,575]

*tugs forelock*

Yes sir, can I shine your shoes sir?

[nowhereman 1]

basically what you are saying is FOX NEWS is as fair and balanced as NBC? Funny thing you don't like the idea light being shed on Obama's corruption charges so what do you socialists do? attack the media that is taking Obama's hypocrosy to task!! Every other news agency seems to be asleep on the wheel when it comes to reporting on both candidates but more so seems to hide the truth when it comes to Obama's dirty laundry....

I got a question for you How can a man who has stood for the same ever be a man that will make change??? Isn't that contradictary in terms? Isn't that a lie? isn't that the lie you allowed yourself to beleive?

Definition of socialism/Democratic platform = to reach into the pockets of hard working small business owners and steal their money and give it to those who seek to take what does not belong to them. To take what they did not earn.... Or as you call it a hand out mentality...

In addition, To perpetuate poverty among the lower classes as to ensure dependence on social programs by detering the american dream thus keeping the corrupt officials in power.. Oh yea one more definition of the Deomcratic/socialist dogma TAX THE RICH TO STEAL FROM THE POOR.

SOCIALISM IS THE DEATH OF DEMOCRACY....

Now i hope i got you guys stirred up and riled up...... this should be fun this thread has to much preahing to the chior i just want to drop in to sing a different tune.... I'll wait for your replies...

I haven't seen this much garbage since I drove through Staten Island! Typical right wing nonsense... avoid the issue (whatever it is), call anyone that disagrees with them a socialist, liberal or unpatriotic... wash, rinse & repeat.

[kaydee457 13]

Fox is totally biased, but they have babes in short skirts so I can overlook it to a point. As for Megyn Kelly I'll bet money she's sleeping with her co-host, based on the way they interact with one another.

Megyn Kelly Marries Internet Security Executive, Attempted Dog Murderer

We've always adored The New York Times' wedding section, which seems to consist of ridiculously narrated marathon-length marriage announcements. Sometimes the famous are splashed on those nuptial pages.

Fox News anchor Megyn "with a 'Y'" Kelly recently tied the knot with Douglas Blunt, a charming and handsome Internet Security executive. But this cute couple almost called it quits a few short months ago! Here's why:

A retractable dog leash helped seal their fate. On New Year's Eve, Mr. Brunt and Ms. Kelly were in Washington walking her two Shih Tzus when Mr. Brunt lost control of the leash tethered to Bailey. The dog narrowly missed being hit by a car.

"I apologized," Mr. Brunt recalled. But Ms. Kelly couldn't let it go and accused him of trying to kill the dog. By midnight, they'd broken up."

Huh? Is that all the New York Times is going to give us? No details about the alleged murder? Did he kick the dog? Toss the dog? or is Kelly just a little too quick to point the finger?

Anyway, the happy couple eventually kissed and made up, and, like lovesick high schoolers via 1998, their engagement consisted of a Titanic theme. No word on if Blunt is still trying to off Kelly's Shih Tzus.

http://soupcans.blogspot.com/2008/03/megyn...t-security.html

Liberals doing what liberals do.........

[Pooky 3,792]

So Fox is biased. BFHD.

Where is the outrage about the LA Times? They have a tape, everyone and their cat now knows what's on the tape, everyone with even a smidgeon of hearing knows that both sides have dealt with the controversial figure on the tape, yet the LA Times won't make it public, on account of journalistic integrity.

PUHLEEEEEEEEEEEEEZE!

Journalistic integrity my #######! If it was Sarah Palin on the tape it would have been released quicker than you could say Boo! and carried on every major network news show in the USA.

So before you single out Fox and call them the Devil, remember that it cuts both ways.

If Obama gets elected, the media will have played an enormous part in his victory. And that is not the way an election should be won.

[nowhereman 1]

So Fox is biased. BFHD.

Where is the outrage about the LA Times? They have a tape, everyone and their cat now knows what's on the tape, everyone with even a smidgeon of hearing knows that both sides have dealt with the controversial figure on the tape, yet the LA Times won't make it public, on account of journalistic integrity.

PUHLEEEEEEEEEEEEEZE!

Journalistic integrity my #######! If it was Sarah Palin on the tape it would have been released quicker than you could say Boo! and carried on every major network news show in the USA.

So before you single out Fox and call them the Devil, remember that it cuts both ways.

If Obama gets elected, the media will have played an enormous part in his victory. And that is not the way an election should be won.

Didn't mommy teach you when you were 6 that two wrongs don't make a right? Sure there are some left-leaning media outlets & any blatant distortion of the facts is wrong, but to condone what Fox does is total hypocrisy.

[Ban Hammer 13,352]

So Fox is biased. BFHD.

Where is the outrage about the LA Times? They have a tape, everyone and their cat now knows what's on the tape, everyone with even a smidgeon of hearing knows that both sides have dealt with the controversial figure on the tape, yet the LA Times won't make it public, on account of journalistic integrity.

PUHLEEEEEEEEEEEEEZE!

Journalistic integrity my #######! If it was Sarah Palin on the tape it would have been released quicker than you could say Boo! and carried on every major network news show in the USA.

So before you single out Fox and call them the Devil, remember that it cuts both ways.

If Obama gets elected, the media will have played an enormous part in his victory. And that is not the way an election should be won.

Didn't mommy teach you when you were 6 that two wrongs don't make a right? Sure there are some left-leaning media outlets & any blatant distortion of the facts is wrong, but to condone what Fox does is total hypocrisy.

some is an understatement.

[nowhereman 1]

Fox is totally biased, but they have babes in short skirts so I can overlook it to a point. As for Megyn Kelly I'll bet money she's sleeping with her co-host, based on the way they interact with one another.

Megyn Kelly Marries Internet Security Executive, Attempted Dog Murderer

We've always adored The New York Times' wedding section, which seems to consist of ridiculously narrated marathon-length marriage announcements. Sometimes the famous are splashed on those nuptial pages.

Fox News anchor Megyn "with a 'Y'" Kelly recently tied the knot with Douglas Blunt, a charming and handsome Internet Security executive. But this cute couple almost called it quits a few short months ago! Here's why:

A retractable dog leash helped seal their fate. On New Year's Eve, Mr. Brunt and Ms. Kelly were in Washington walking her two Shih Tzus when Mr. Brunt lost control of the leash tethered to Bailey. The dog narrowly missed being hit by a car.

"I apologized," Mr. Brunt recalled. But Ms. Kelly couldn't let it go and accused him of trying to kill the dog. By midnight, they'd broken up."

Huh? Is that all the New York Times is going to give us? No details about the alleged murder? Did he kick the dog? Toss the dog? or is Kelly just a little too quick to point the finger?

Anyway, the happy couple eventually kissed and made up, and, like lovesick high schoolers via 1998, their engagement consisted of a Titanic theme. No word on if Blunt is still trying to off Kelly's Shih Tzus.

http://soupcans.blogspot.com/2008/03/megyn...t-security.html

Liberals doing what liberals do.........

Kaydee the post right above yours is directed to close-minded, uninformed people just like you. Here's a news flash: millions of non-liberals will vote for Obama. Go wrap another layer of tin-foil around that thick skull of yours & try to read something other than Mein Kampf.

[Pooky 3,792]

So Fox is biased. BFHD.

Where is the outrage about the LA Times? They have a tape, everyone and their cat now knows what's on the tape, everyone with even a smidgeon of hearing knows that both sides have dealt with the controversial figure on the tape, yet the LA Times won't make it public, on account of journalistic integrity.

PUHLEEEEEEEEEEEEEZE!

Journalistic integrity my #######! If it was Sarah Palin on the tape it would have been released quicker than you could say Boo! and carried on every major network news show in the USA.

So before you single out Fox and call them the Devil, remember that it cuts both ways.

If Obama gets elected, the media will have played an enormous part in his victory. And that is not the way an election should be won.

Didn't mommy teach you when you were 6 that two wrongs don't make a right? Sure there are some left-leaning media outlets & any blatant distortion of the facts is wrong, but to condone what Fox does is total hypocrisy.

Where, in what I wrote, did I condone Fox? Didn't your Mommy teach you to read before you comment? Or are you too far up your own ####### to be able to see the words on the screen?

I don't like the way the media as a whole has gone about covering this election, be it Fox, NBC, CBS, or any other TV /Cable network, talk radio, or any of the newspapers. There is no unbiased coverage in this country whatsoever.

As a non-voting neutral this time around, I'm amazed by how little clear policy has made it into the news. Everything has been personality based and, as I said last time, that is not the way an election should be won.

[nowhereman 1]

So Fox is biased. BFHD.

Where is the outrage about the LA Times? They have a tape, everyone and their cat now knows what's on the tape, everyone with even a smidgeon of hearing knows that both sides have dealt with the controversial figure on the tape, yet the LA Times won't make it public, on account of journalistic integrity.

PUHLEEEEEEEEEEEEEZE!

Journalistic integrity my #######! If it was Sarah Palin on the tape it would have been released quicker than you could say Boo! and carried on every major network news show in the USA.

So before you single out Fox and call them the Devil, remember that it cuts both ways.

If Obama gets elected, the media will have played an enormous part in his victory. And that is not the way an election should be won.

Didn't mommy teach you when you were 6 that two wrongs don't make a right? Sure there are some left-leaning media outlets & any blatant distortion of the facts is wrong, but to condone what Fox does is total hypocrisy.

some is an understatement.

I'm forced to watch CNN & Fox all day long at work (military EOC with news on 4 screens) & although CNN might lean a little left Fox leans quite a bit to the right. I'm basing this on a few things. First of all Fox has McCain on a lot more than Obama & their commentary about McCain is much more positive than when they speak about Obama. Secondly they often have a right wing commentator on and nobody to counter what he says, so it's entirely one-sided. CNN at least has about equal coverage of the candidates & commentators from both sides.

Right wingers of course argue that most of the media is biased against them & Fox just evens out the playing field a bit, but manure from either side of the fence is still manure. Therefore the "two wrongs make a right" philosophy is fatally flawed.

In response to Pooky: The "So Fox is biased. BFHD" comment sounds like condoning what they do to me.

Edited October 30, 2008 by nowhereman

[Ban Hammer 13,352]

So Fox is biased. BFHD.

Where is the outrage about the LA Times? They have a tape, everyone and their cat now knows what's on the tape, everyone with even a smidgeon of hearing knows that both sides have dealt with the controversial figure on the tape, yet the LA Times won't make it public, on account of journalistic integrity.

PUHLEEEEEEEEEEEEEZE!

Journalistic integrity my #######! If it was Sarah Palin on the tape it would have been released quicker than you could say Boo! and carried on every major network news show in the USA.

So before you single out Fox and call them the Devil, remember that it cuts both ways.

If Obama gets elected, the media will have played an enormous part in his victory. And that is not the way an election should be won.

Didn't mommy teach you when you were 6 that two wrongs don't make a right? Sure there are some left-leaning media outlets & any blatant distortion of the facts is wrong, but to condone what Fox does is total hypocrisy.

some is an understatement.

I'm forced to watch CNN & Fox all day long at work (military EOC with news on 4 screens) & although CNN might lean a little left Fox leans quite a bit to the right. I'm basing this on a few things. First of all Fox has McCain on a lot more than Obama & their commentary about McCain is much more positive than when they speak about Obama. Secondly they often have a right wing commentator on and nobody to counter what he says, so it's entirely one-sided. CNN at least has about equal coverage of the candidates & commentators from both sides.

Right wingers of course argue that most of the media is biased against them & Fox just evens out the playing field a bit, but manure from either side of the fence is still manure. Therefore the "two wrongs make a right" philosophy is fatally flawed.

In response to Pooky: The "So Fox is biased. BFHD" comment sounds like condoning what they do to me.

conservative: fox

liberal: everything else

yup, sounds like an even playing field to me.

[HAL 9000 96]

So Fox is biased. BFHD.

Where is the outrage about the LA Times? They have a tape, everyone and their cat now knows what's on the tape, everyone with even a smidgeon of hearing knows that both sides have dealt with the controversial figure on the tape, yet the LA Times won't make it public, on account of journalistic integrity.

PUHLEEEEEEEEEEEEEZE!

Journalistic integrity my #######! If it was Sarah Palin on the tape it would have been released quicker than you could say Boo! and carried on every major network news show in the USA.

So before you single out Fox and call them the Devil, remember that it cuts both ways.

If Obama gets elected, the media will have played an enormous part in his victory. And that is not the way an election should be won.

Didn't mommy teach you when you were 6 that two wrongs don't make a right? Sure there are some left-leaning media outlets & any blatant distortion of the facts is wrong, but to condone what Fox does is total hypocrisy.

some is an understatement.

HAL 9000 has a cheap bridge to offer you.

[nowhereman 1]

So Fox is biased. BFHD.

Where is the outrage about the LA Times? They have a tape, everyone and their cat now knows what's on the tape, everyone with even a smidgeon of hearing knows that both sides have dealt with the controversial figure on the tape, yet the LA Times won't make it public, on account of journalistic integrity.

PUHLEEEEEEEEEEEEEZE!

Journalistic integrity my #######! If it was Sarah Palin on the tape it would have been released quicker than you could say Boo! and carried on every major network news show in the USA.

So before you single out Fox and call them the Devil, remember that it cuts both ways.

If Obama gets elected, the media will have played an enormous part in his victory. And that is not the way an election should be won.

Didn't mommy teach you when you were 6 that two wrongs don't make a right? Sure there are some left-leaning media outlets & any blatant distortion of the facts is wrong, but to condone what Fox does is total hypocrisy.

some is an understatement.

I'm forced to watch CNN & Fox all day long at work (military EOC with news on 4 screens) & although CNN might lean a little left Fox leans quite a bit to the right. I'm basing this on a few things. First of all Fox has McCain on a lot more than Obama & their commentary about McCain is much more positive than when they speak about Obama. Secondly they often have a right wing commentator on and nobody to counter what he says, so it's entirely one-sided. CNN at least has about equal coverage of the candidates & commentators from both sides.

Right wingers of course argue that most of the media is biased against them & Fox just evens out the playing field a bit, but manure from either side of the fence is still manure. Therefore the "two wrongs make a right" philosophy is fatally flawed.

In response to Pooky: The "So Fox is biased. BFHD" comment sounds like condoning what they do to me.

conservative: fox

liberal: everything else

yup, sounds like an even playing field to me.

Charles you have an amazing ability to miss the point & gloss over the truth... perhaps you should run for office or at least sell used cars?

[Sofiyya 1,687]

Fox News hasn't drunk the kool aid like all the others have, thank God. That's why Obamacans think they're biased.

Edited October 30, 2008 by Virtual wife

[nowhereman 1]

Fox News hasn't drunk the kool aid like all the others have, thank God. That's why Obamacans think they're biased.

Another excellent example of bias is OK, as long as it favors my views. Pure hypocrisy.

[NickD 203]

FOX News is in the desperate throes of backing a losing party. Despite what Megyn "Obama's Baby Mama" Kelly would have you believe, FOX has been the GOP's mouthpiece throughout this election, viciously maligning Barack Obama while pushing the party's conservative agenda. (For proof of just how much slander they have spewed, check out FOX Attacks Obama, FOX Attacks Obama 2, or FOX Attacks Obama Just Like Kerry.) In fact, I hold them as responsible as McCain's most bigoted supporters for stoking the racial prejudice and xenophobic hatred that we're now seeing in campaign events across the country. Amazingly though, the Obama campaign has begun calling out FOX for their loathsome media bias.

First, Obama criticized FOX on national television during the third presidential debate. Then, in an interview for The New York Times Sunday magazine, Obama told Matt Bai, "I am convinced that if there were no Fox News, I might be two or three points higher in the polls." And now we have Obama staffers confronting FOX on their own network. Just watch as Bill Burton remains unflappable during this heated exchange with Kelly, who completely loses her cool.

In response to McCain's ludicrous attack on Obama for being "the Redistributor" of wealth -- an attack FOX has of course perpetuated and exacerbated with their Joe the Plumber socialist nonsense -- Burton calmly tells Kelly: "This is a fake news controversy drummed up by the all too common alliance of FOX News, the Drudge Report and John McCain, who apparently decided to close out his campaign with the same false, desperate attacks that have failed for months."

It is, as Burton says, a fake news controversy. Even <a href="http://www.mydd.com/story/2008/10/27/20585/594">conservatives like George Will have said that 95 percent of the government's job is to redistribute wealth. But in a hopeless attempt to paint Obama as a Socialist, the Republicans and FOX News alike are on the verge of losing a crucial ideological battle on free market fundamentalism, which is probably why Burton's composure causes Kelly to become choleric.

FOX isn't merely rearranging the deck chairs on the GOP's Titanic anymore. They're violently throwing those chairs at everyone trying to make their way to a lifeboat.

http://www.alternet.org/blogs/video/105026...e_fight_to_fox/

I got a headache from watching this video, hazardous to my health, can I sue anybody?