Jump to content

29 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Posted
Why is there a need to take arms in nuclear arsenals? Just 10 of them will annihilate the US infrastructure, or China, Russia.

Exactly.

Live now people...the end may be near....again! :o

Boys and their toys....

:lol:

Boys? You never know maybe Palin could one day be in possession of those codes. :help:

Sly

Funny-quotes-Daffy-Duck.jpg
Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Colombia
Timeline
Posted
Why is there a need to take arms in nuclear arsenals? Just 10 of them will annihilate the US infrastructure, or China, Russia.

Exactly.

Live now people...the end may be near....again! :o

Boys and their toys....

:lol:

Boys? You never know maybe Palin could one day be in possession of those codes. :help:

Sly

Please do not frighten us. Its not Halloween just yet.

Wishing you ten-fold that which you wish upon all others.

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Colombia
Timeline
Posted
Why is there a need to take arms in nuclear arsenals? Just 10 of them will annihilate the US infrastructure, or China, Russia.

We had 12,000, but was cut back to 6,000, believe it's called a deterrent. We certainly can't use them without killing ourselves, just using a fraction of that number would kill most of us. The lucky ones will get it instantly, the unfortunate ones would suffer a very long painful death. Some have questioned here why we are permitted to have this deterrent and other nations are not. Mostly, because we are a responsible and just society where the others are maniacs. Is this treason or common sense?

This is an ace in the hole for us, but since Japan, where it was claimed the use of these weapons ended the war, well that wasn't true at all, so happens the Soviets after doing their part in Germany declared war on Japan at the same time these bombs were built. The Japanese knew they couldn't fend off two huge nations and agreed to surrender to us rather than to Stalin.

But all of our wars since then have been conventional requiring ground troops that we are in vast short supply of using so-called conventional weapons.

If any nation uses nuclear weapons, would be an instant enemy of the rest of the world, so why to we have them? A deterrent of course.

Posted
Why is there a need to take arms in nuclear arsenals? Just 10 of them will annihilate the US infrastructure, or China, Russia.

Exactly.

Live now people...the end may be near....again! :o

Boys and their toys....

:lol:

Boys? You never know maybe Palin could one day be in possession of those codes. :help:

Sly

OK, let's see:
  • Maggie Thatcher was in posession of UK's equivalent codes
  • Hillary Clinton could have been in posession of US codes (had she been nominated instead of BHO)
  • Nancy Pelosi will (if Jorge Jr and Cheney kick bucket prior to 2009/01/19) be in such posession (of US codes)
So, why are you "having a cow" (Bart Simpsonism) about Palin having posession of same?

2005/07/10 I-129F filed for Pras

2005/11/07 I-129F approved, forwarded to NVC--to Chennai Consulate 2005/11/14

2005/12/02 Packet-3 received from Chennai

2005/12/21 Visa Interview Date

2006/04/04 Pras' entry into US at DTW

2006/04/15 Church Wedding at Novi (Detroit suburb), MI

2006/05/01 AOS Packet (I-485/I-131/I-765) filed at Chicago

2006/08/23 AP and EAD approved. Two down, 1.5 to go

2006/10/13 Pras' I-485 interview--APPROVED!

2006/10/27 Pras' conditional GC arrives -- .5 to go (2 yrs to Conditions Removal)

2008/07/21 I-751 (conditions removal) filed

2008/08/22 I-751 biometrics completed

2009/06/18 I-751 approved

2009/07/03 10-year GC received; last 0.5 done!

2009/07/23 Pras files N-400

2009/11/16 My 46TH birthday, Pras N-400 approved

2010/03/18 Pras' swear-in

---------------------------------------------------------------------

As long as the LORD's beside me, I don't care if this road ever ends.

Posted (edited)
Because unlike the other three named, Palin is an idiot. Next?
Cancel (as Cleo forgot about Quayle's proverbial low IQ) Edited by CherryXS

2005/07/10 I-129F filed for Pras

2005/11/07 I-129F approved, forwarded to NVC--to Chennai Consulate 2005/11/14

2005/12/02 Packet-3 received from Chennai

2005/12/21 Visa Interview Date

2006/04/04 Pras' entry into US at DTW

2006/04/15 Church Wedding at Novi (Detroit suburb), MI

2006/05/01 AOS Packet (I-485/I-131/I-765) filed at Chicago

2006/08/23 AP and EAD approved. Two down, 1.5 to go

2006/10/13 Pras' I-485 interview--APPROVED!

2006/10/27 Pras' conditional GC arrives -- .5 to go (2 yrs to Conditions Removal)

2008/07/21 I-751 (conditions removal) filed

2008/08/22 I-751 biometrics completed

2009/06/18 I-751 approved

2009/07/03 10-year GC received; last 0.5 done!

2009/07/23 Pras files N-400

2009/11/16 My 46TH birthday, Pras N-400 approved

2010/03/18 Pras' swear-in

---------------------------------------------------------------------

As long as the LORD's beside me, I don't care if this road ever ends.

Posted
Why is there a need to take arms in nuclear arsenals? Just 10 of them will annihilate the US infrastructure, or China, Russia.

Exactly.

Live now people...the end may be near....again! :o

Boys and their toys....

:lol:

Boys? You never know maybe Palin could one day be in possession of those codes. :help:

Sly

OK, let's see:
  • Maggie Thatcher was in posession of UK's equivalent codes
  • Hillary Clinton could have been in posession of US codes (had she been nominated instead of BHO)
  • Nancy Pelosi will (if Jorge Jr and Cheney kick bucket prior to 2009/01/19) be in such posession (of US codes)
So, why are you "having a cow" (Bart Simpsonism) about Palin having posession of same?

Get serious. You really can't compare Maggie Thatcher to Palin. :bonk:

Sly

Funny-quotes-Daffy-Duck.jpg
Posted
Why is there a need to take arms in nuclear arsenals? Just 10 of them will annihilate the US infrastructure, or China, Russia.

Exactly.

Live now people...the end may be near....again! :o

Boys and their toys....

:lol:

Boys? You never know maybe Palin could one day be in possession of those codes. :help:

Sly

OK, let's see:
  • Maggie Thatcher was in posession of UK's equivalent codes
  • Hillary Clinton could have been in posession of US codes (had she been nominated instead of BHO)
  • Nancy Pelosi will (if Jorge Jr and Cheney kick bucket prior to 2009/01/19) be in such posession (of US codes)
So, why are you "having a cow" (Bart Simpsonism) about Palin having posession of same?

Get serious. You really can't compare Maggie Thatcher to Palin. :bonk:

Sly

:bonk: :bonk: for you, since you also missed about Quayle.

2005/07/10 I-129F filed for Pras

2005/11/07 I-129F approved, forwarded to NVC--to Chennai Consulate 2005/11/14

2005/12/02 Packet-3 received from Chennai

2005/12/21 Visa Interview Date

2006/04/04 Pras' entry into US at DTW

2006/04/15 Church Wedding at Novi (Detroit suburb), MI

2006/05/01 AOS Packet (I-485/I-131/I-765) filed at Chicago

2006/08/23 AP and EAD approved. Two down, 1.5 to go

2006/10/13 Pras' I-485 interview--APPROVED!

2006/10/27 Pras' conditional GC arrives -- .5 to go (2 yrs to Conditions Removal)

2008/07/21 I-751 (conditions removal) filed

2008/08/22 I-751 biometrics completed

2009/06/18 I-751 approved

2009/07/03 10-year GC received; last 0.5 done!

2009/07/23 Pras files N-400

2009/11/16 My 46TH birthday, Pras N-400 approved

2010/03/18 Pras' swear-in

---------------------------------------------------------------------

As long as the LORD's beside me, I don't care if this road ever ends.

Posted
How do you modernize a nuke? Does it explode differently?

Sly

  • reprocess out the degraded material (some of it converts to unusable form, such as Pu-239 --> Pu-240)
  • update the trigger from obsolescent to state-of-art electronics

Actually Americium-241 ingrowth is a problem though Pu-240 is a problem too but not for the reason you state. Pu-239 does not turn into Pu-240. I've worked at several nuclear weapons facilities.

"The fact that we are here today to debate raising America’s debt limit is a sign of leadership failure. It is a sign that the U.S. Government can’t pay its own bills. It is a sign that we now depend on ongoing financial assistance from foreign countries to finance our Government’s reckless fiscal policies."

Senator Barack Obama
Senate Floor Speech on Public Debt
March 16, 2006



barack-cowboy-hat.jpg
90f.JPG

Posted

This conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience. The total influence -- economic, political, even spiritual -- is felt in every city, every State house, every office of the Federal government. We recognize the imperative need for this development. Yet we must not fail to comprehend its grave implications. Our toil, resources and livelihood are all involved; so is the very structure of our society.

President Dwight Eisenhower, 1961

Posted
Why is there a need to take arms in nuclear arsenals? Just 10 of them will annihilate the US infrastructure, or China, Russia.

Exactly.

Live now people...the end may be near....again! :o

Boys and their toys....

:lol:

Boys? You never know maybe Palin could one day be in possession of those codes. :help:

Sly

OK, let's see:
  • Maggie Thatcher was in posession of UK's equivalent codes
  • Hillary Clinton could have been in posession of US codes (had she been nominated instead of BHO)
  • Nancy Pelosi will (if Jorge Jr and Cheney kick bucket prior to 2009/01/19) be in such posession (of US codes)
So, why are you "having a cow" (Bart Simpsonism) about Palin having posession of same?

Get serious. You really can't compare Maggie Thatcher to Palin. :bonk:

Sly

:bonk::bonk: for you, since you also missed about Quayle.

Where is quayle on that list?

Ah, not there. Your idea was to link the idea that people distrust Palin simply because she is a woman. Totally false. People mistrust Palin because she is intellectually challenged.

Refusing to use the spellchick!

I have put you on ignore. No really, I have, but you are still ruining my enjoyment of this site. .

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Colombia
Timeline
Posted
Because unlike the other three named, Palin is an idiot. Next?
Cancel (as Cleo forgot about Quayle's proverbial low IQ)

Quayle was past tense. Palin is hopefully a negative future.

Wishing you ten-fold that which you wish upon all others.

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...