Palin's off-script comments on 150k wardrobe scandal irk McCain aides

[Ban Hammer 13,352]

buy clothes, people complain. don't buy clothes, people will whine about how she looks dressed down. it's a no win situation.

nah - in this case it isn't about the clothes. Its her reverting off her script (lolz) to talk about something McCain wants to go awayyyyy.

the constant carrying on in vj about her clothes proves my point.

[Marilyn. 340]

constant carrying on? ..lol.. i don't think anybody talked about her clothes before she spent all this money...

I don't recall anybody commenting on her wardrobe before this...

[Ban Hammer 13,352]

constant carrying on? ..lol.. i don't think anybody talked about her clothes before she spent all this money...

I don't recall anybody commenting on her wardrobe before this...

i didn't say that anyone did.

but ever since she did spend that money on clothes, it's been a hot topic and major scoring point for some reason with the left leaners.

[LaL 418]

buy clothes, people complain. don't buy clothes, people will whine about how she looks dressed down. it's a no win situation.

nah - in this case it isn't about the clothes. Its her reverting off her script (lolz) to talk about something McCain wants to go awayyyyy.

the constant carrying on in vj about her clothes proves my point.

obviously Mrs Palin can't let it go either!

(which is actually the point of the article)

Edited October 27, 2008 by LaL

[Ban Hammer 13,352]

buy clothes, people complain. don't buy clothes, people will whine about how she looks dressed down. it's a no win situation.

nah - in this case it isn't about the clothes. Its her reverting off her script (lolz) to talk about something McCain wants to go awayyyyy.

the constant carrying on in vj about her clothes proves my point.

obviously Mrs Palin can't let it go either!

(which is actually the point of the article)

nor can the left leaners on vj

[LaL 418]

buy clothes, people complain. don't buy clothes, people will whine about how she looks dressed down. it's a no win situation.

nah - in this case it isn't about the clothes. Its her reverting off her script (lolz) to talk about something McCain wants to go awayyyyy.

the constant carrying on in vj about her clothes proves my point.

obviously Mrs Palin can't let it go either!

(which is actually the point of the article)

nor can the left leaners on vj

Which is worse - a bunch of leftists who seem to find this a funny topic to discuss or harp on (shocking!), or the team who really would benefit from putting this issue in the past but ye, are still bringing it up themselves

[Ban Hammer 13,352]

buy clothes, people complain. don't buy clothes, people will whine about how she looks dressed down. it's a no win situation.

nah - in this case it isn't about the clothes. Its her reverting off her script (lolz) to talk about something McCain wants to go awayyyyy.

the constant carrying on in vj about her clothes proves my point.

obviously Mrs Palin can't let it go either!

(which is actually the point of the article)

nor can the left leaners on vj

Which is worse - a bunch of leftists who seem to find this a funny topic to discuss or harp on (shocking!), or the team who really would benefit from putting this issue in the past but ye, are still bringing it up themselves

i'd vote for the latter - so you take it up with aj, who posted this thread

[HAL 9000 96]

And yet brother Charles keeps the debate going. Bravo brother!

[LaL 418]

Which is worse - a bunch of leftists who seem to find this a funny topic to discuss or harp on (shocking!), or the team who really would benefit from putting this issue in the past but ye, are still bringing it up themselves

i'd vote for the latter - so you take it up with aj, who posted this thread

latter = GOP

[Ban Hammer 13,352]

Which is worse - a bunch of leftists who seem to find this a funny topic to discuss or harp on (shocking!), or the team who really would benefit from putting this issue in the past but ye, are still bringing it up themselves

i'd vote for the latter - so you take it up with aj, who posted this thread

latter = GOP

i wasn't aware aj was the gop.

[LaL 418]

Are you reading charles? you are starting to not make sense.

[HAL 9000 96]

McCain's campaign would have benefited from lame story non-issues if the economic meltdown never took place as long and there was no Iraq war to notice. Notice how most people are sick and tired about BS and now its quite evident what side is more desperate than the other.

[Ban Hammer 13,352]

Are you reading charles? you are starting to not make sense.

nevermind, you're missing it.

[LaL 418]

nevermind, you're missing it.

I am missing nothing. I said " which is worse = leftists who enjoy this #######, or GOP who should try to move on instead of going back to it"

You said - i vote the latter (which means the 2nd option) which means you are choosing that the GOP is worse for continuing to discuss this. AJ posting the thread has nothing to do with it.

/head meet brick wall.

[Ban Hammer 13,352]

nevermind, you're missing it.

I am missing nothing. I said " which is worse = leftists who enjoy this #######, or GOP who should try to move on instead of going back to it"

You said - i vote the latter (which means the 2nd option) which means you are choosing that the GOP is worse for continuing to discuss this. AJ posting the thread has nothing to do with it.

/head meet brick wall.

believe me, i fully agree with that bolded.

the team who really would benefit from putting this issue in the past but ye, are still bringing it up themselves

the team being team aj.