Rejecting Palin, Alaska's Largest Paper Endorses Obama-Biden

[one...two...tree 2,762]

The Nation -- Former Secretary of State Colin Powell, conservative commentator Christopher Buckley and others have cited Republican presidential nominee John McCain's selection of Alaska Governor Sarah Palin in explaining their reasons for rejecting the Republican ticket and backing Democrats Barack Obama and Joe Biden.

Now comes the ultimate rejection.

The largest newspaper in Alaska, a publication that has often sided with and encouraged Palin over the years, has endorsed the Democratic ticket.

The major daily newspaper editorial page that knows Alaska's governor best acknowledges in today's editions of Alaska'smost widely-circulated newspaper that "Governor Palin's nomination clearly alters the landscape for Alaskans as we survey this race for the presidency..."

"But, the paper's editors add, in a note that speaks volumes about that quiet discussions going on among thinking Alaskans as the November 4 election approaches, "it does not overwhelm all other judgment."

Reflecting on McCain's selection of their state's controversial chief executive, the Daily News editors allow that, "Governor Palin has shown the country why she has been so successful in her young political career. Passionate, charismatic and indefatigable, she draws huge crowds and sows excitement in her wake. She has made it clear she's a force to be reckoned with, and you can be sure politicians and political professionals across the country have taken note. Her future, in Alaska and on the national stage, seems certain to be played out in the limelight."

"Yet," they add, "despite her formidable gifts, few who have worked closely with the governor would argue she is truly ready to assume command of the most important, powerful nation on earth. To step in and juggle the demands of an economic meltdown, two deadly wars and a deteriorating climate crisis would stretch the governor beyond her range. Like picking Senator McCain for president, putting her one 72-year-old heartbeat from the leadership of the free world is just too risky at this time."

It is difficult to imagine that any individual or publication will offer a more convincing -- nor a more devastating -- critique of the McCain-Palin ticket than the Daily News presents Sunday under the headline: "Obama for President: Palin's rise captivates us but nation needs a steady hand."

Here is the editorial in it entirety:

Alaska enters its 50th-anniversary year in the glow of an improbable and highly memorable event: the nomination of Governor Sarah Palin as the Republican vice presidential candidate. For the first time ever, an Alaskan is making a serious bid for national office, and in doing so she brings broad attention and recognition not only to herself, but also to the state she leads.

Alaska's founders were optimistic people, but even the most farsighted might have been stretched to imagine this scenario. No matter the outcome in November, this election will mark a signal moment in the history of the 49th state. Many Alaskans are proud to see their governor, and their state, so prominent on the national stage.

Governor Palin's nomination clearly alters the landscape for Alaskans as we survey this race for the presidency -- but it does not overwhelm all other judgment. The election, after all is said and done, is not about Sarah Palin, and our sober view is that her running mate, Senator John McCain, is the wrong choice for president at this critical time for our nation.

Senator Barack Obama, the Democratic nominee, brings far more promise to the office. In a time of grave economic crisis, he displays thoughtful analysis, enlists wise counsel and operates with a cool, steady hand. The same cannot be said of Senator McCain.

Since his early acknowledgement that economic policy is not his strong suit, Senator McCain has stumbled and fumbled badly in dealing with the accelerating crisis as it emerged. He declared that "the fundamentals of our economy are strong" at 9 a.m. one day and by 11 a.m. was describing an economy in crisis. He is both a longtime advocate of less market regulation and a supporter of the huge taxpayer-funded Wall Street bailout. His behavior in this crisis -- erratic is a kind description -- shows him to be ill-equipped to lead the essential effort of reining in a runaway financial system and setting an anxious nation on course to economic recovery.

Senator Obama warned regulators and the nation 19 months ago that the subprime lending crisis was a disaster in the making. Senator McCain backed tighter rules for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, but didn't do much to advance that legislation. Of the two candidates, Senator Obama better understands the mortgage meltdown's root causes and has the judgment and intelligence to shape a solution, as well as the leadership to rally the country behind it. It is easy to look at Senator Obama and see a return to the smart, bipartisan economic policies of the last Democratic administration in Washington, which left the country with the momentum of growth and a budget surplus that President George Bush has squandered.

On the most important issue of the day, Senator Obama is a clear choice.

Senator McCain describes himself as a maverick, by which he seems to mean that he spent 25 years trying unsuccessfully to persuade his own party to follow his bipartisan, centrist lead. Sadly, maverick John McCain didn't show up for the campaign. Instead we have candidate McCain, who embraces the extreme Republican orthodoxy he once resisted and cynically asks Americans to buy for another four years.

It is Senator Obama who truly promises fundamental change in Washington. You need look no further than the guilt-by-association lies and sound-bite distortions of the degenerating McCain campaign to see how readily he embraces the divisive, fear-mongering tactics of Karl Rove. And while Senator McCain points to the fragile success of the troop surge in stabilizing conditions in Iraq, it is also plain that he was fundamentally wrong about the more crucial early decisions. Contrary to his assurances, we were not greeted as liberators; it was not a short, easy war; and Americans -- not Iraqi oil -- have had to pay for it. It was Senator Obama who more clearly saw the danger ahead.

The unqualified endorsement of Senator Obama by a seasoned, respected soldier and diplomat like General Colin Powell, a Republican icon, should reassure all Americans that the Democratic candidate will pass muster as commander in chief.

On a matter of parochial interest, Senator Obama opposes the opening of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, but so does Senator McCain. We think both are wrong, and hope a President Obama can be convinced to support environmentally responsible development of that resource.

Governor Palin has shown the country why she has been so successful in her young political career. Passionate, charismatic and indefatigable, she draws huge crowds and sows excitement in her wake. She has made it clear she's a force to be reckoned with, and you can be sure politicians and political professionals across the country have taken note. Her future, in Alaska and on the national stage, seems certain to be played out in the limelight.

Yet despite her formidable gifts, few who have worked closely with the governor would argue she is truly ready to assume command of the most important, powerful nation on earth. To step in and juggle the demands of an economic meltdown, two deadly wars and a deteriorating climate crisis would stretch the governor beyond her range. Like picking Senator McCain for president, putting her one 72-year-old heartbeat from the leadership of the free world is just too risky at this time.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/thenation/20081026...tion/45376291_1

[almaty 19]

pwned Palin

[IAMX 3,055]

The Anchorage Daily News is retarded.

[akdiver 3]

As a long-time daily reader of the ADN - I can tell you that it is definitely a liberal rag. The bias on pretty much any issue it covers is crystal clear. It's really not surprising that it would endorse Obama.

Now - that said - Palin is still a moron and I hope she gets elected VP just to get her the hell out of Alaska.

[IAMX 3,055]

As a long-time daily reader of the ADN - I can tell you that it is definitely a liberal rag. The bias on pretty much any issue it covers is crystal clear. It's really not surprising that it would endorse Obama.

Now - that said - Palin is still a moron and I hope she gets elected VP just to get her the hell out of Alaska.

You also forgot 'to piss off Democrats'.

Edited October 27, 2008 by SRVT

[akdiver 3]

You also forgot 'to piss off Democrats'.

Nah - that's just a secondary benefit.