Igor List

[Des Loves Cindy 0]

Just thought I would ask if anyone knows approximately how many people are on the VSC igor list that should not bee there??? I have notice that there are some there that you can not used the link for. I guess because time lines have not been complete. Why are they on the list?

Thanks

[EWRI6884 0]

I believe only those who have updated their official timeline will reflect on IGORS list.

[cdneh 3,112]

I believe only those who have updated their official timeline will reflect on IGORS list.

There are people at Vermont who have not even enough information in a timeline to estimate a adjudication date, much less updated it.

Noa1's from early in 2008.

Names who haven't been to VJ in months. None of those names have changed places in the 3 months I've been looking at the list, never been updated, not logged on since April or May.

If they are on the list, they affect every persons place who is valid, and waiting.

[Nich-Nick 3,354]

If there is not a clickable link for a couple, it means they don't have a VJ forum profile set up. You can have a timeline without signing up for posting in the forums.

A few on the list I know about-

Olga & Jerry- as still waiting I think

Dion & Michelle-broke up and aren't pursuing the visa

Jennifer & Jack- were approved June and that's a duplicate timeline

Gaura & Nitai- approved, but she didn't update timeline

S&W-approved in May

[Labhrais 6]

Moving up on Igor's list isn't a guarantee of anything, so probably best to quit worrying about who doesn't "belong" above you.

Just scroll down to the bottom of the list and focus on all those peeps that YOU are "ahead" of.

[KimandRuss 0]

When we were waiting I researched the first 20 on the list several times (we waited a year) and they all were either no longer active or had been approved and did not update their timelines. This fluctuated all the time but it was always pretty constant that the first 20 or so were 'bad'. Unless you want to go through each one and contact them (if you're as neurotic as me ), there really is no way of telling. Perspective is important right now.

[cdneh 3,112]

When we were waiting I researched the first 20 on the list several times (we waited a year) and they all were either no longer active or had been approved and did not update their timelines. This fluctuated all the time but it was always pretty constant that the first 20 or so were 'bad'. Unless you want to go through each one and contact them (if you're as neurotic as me ), there really is no way of telling. Perspective is important right now.

They're probably the same ones still there So far, I've got 26 'bad' ones...yes, I am that neurotic

[annax 0]

When we were waiting I researched the first 20 on the list several times (we waited a year) and they all were either no longer active or had been approved and did not update their timelines. This fluctuated all the time but it was always pretty constant that the first 20 or so were 'bad'. Unless you want to go through each one and contact them (if you're as neurotic as me ), there really is no way of telling. Perspective is important right now.

They're probably the same ones still there So far, I've got 26 'bad' ones...yes, I am that neurotic

I just wish whoever runs the list would update it to reflect the new processing times posted. A good number of people on both lists are now outside of the processing times. (something like 50 on Cal and 20 on Vermont)