No matter who your for in the election read this

[almaty 19]

alright, this thread rawks

[*Robert* 2]

Hmmm - it isn't really all that interesting...

There is no factual basis in that article - its blatant propaganda.

Gotta totally agree with you.

The whole piece was just jibberish and made no sense at all.

[Saddle Bronc 124]

Hmmm - it isn't really all that interesting...

There is no factual basis in that article - its blatant propaganda.

I guess you must not read or understand historical-based fiction--so,

[rocks 494]

ugh, i thought this thread would have been locked by now, i'm disappointed.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Hmmm - it isn't really all that interesting...

There is no factual basis in that article - its blatant propaganda.

I guess you must not read or understand historical-based fiction--so,

Its as historically legitimate as the Da Vinci Code.

[justashooter 430]

I cant belive you would post this utter crapp on here. My family lost everyone except my grandfather in the camps and I am amazed that you could think the Obama if following in Hitlers footsteps.

YOU NEED HELP.

my grandfather was the son of german jewish immigrants to America during the pogroms of 1904-06. he spent the years 1942-1946 in europe, liberating your grandfather, and poles, czechs, and russians of all faiths.

my son's may also save your sons. it is too late for me to save you. if you cannot see the danger, you will not lift up your hand for me to pull you out of the water by.

osama may not accomplish as much as hitler did, but he is pushing us along the same path. his view of an ideal government is one which controls every moment of your life, from conception to interrment. his disrespect for the constitutional rights my family fought to give you and preserve for you over the last 250 years is apparent. osama does not believe in the first amendment, or the second. the rest are not far behind in his registry of contempt.

obama supported a bill introduced last year by a group of democrats that would have eliminated political discussion on the internet. this bill was advanced by pelosi and many other democrats in the house, and welcomed by obama and clinton in the senate. it would have made it a criminal offense to begin a political dialouge on the net without first registering with a governmental oversight body, paying a filing fee, and giving 30 days advance notice regarding the intent and nature of the communication. this bill was designed to remove pressure from representatives who are taking actions their constituents do not agree with. it would have prevented us from giving them pressure by preventing the dissemination of information in a timely manner, and through sources that are not controlled by the government.

what we are doing in this thread right now would be a criminal act, if the bill had been passed and signed into law. thankfully, bush warned that he would veto the bill, and enough hue and cry was raised by net bloggers regarding the unconstitutionality of such legislation that your candidate backed down. the first amendment specifically protects your right to publically complain about the actions of your governmental representatives and demand explanation from them.

obama's desire to gut the second amendment is well documented. he has also issued positions in contradiction to your fourth amendment protections. these constitutional protections are just inconveniences to him. if you place a man with such policy intentions in power, he may not take us all the way down the gaden path, but he will surely point us in that direction and increase the probability of such result.

[Saddle Bronc 124]

Hmmm - it isn't really all that interesting...

There is no factual basis in that article - its blatant propaganda.

I guess you must not read or understand historical-based fiction--so,

Its as historically legitimate as the Da Vinci Code.

For that one, :bonk:

[Sister Fracas 5]

Hmmm - it isn't really all that interesting...

There is no factual basis in that article - its blatant propaganda.

Gotta totally agree with you.

The whole piece was just jibberish and made no sense at all.

YAYYYYYYYYYY, long time no see!!!! Hiya Roi!

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Hmmm - it isn't really all that interesting...

There is no factual basis in that article - its blatant propaganda.

I guess you must not read or understand historical-based fiction--so,

Its as historically legitimate as the Da Vinci Code.

For that one, :bonk:

So... you thought the Da Vinci Code was historically legitimate...?

[Mononoke28 135]

So... you thought the Da Vinci Code was historically legitimate...?

So is "Jurassic Park".

Diana

[MichelleN 0]

osama may not accomplish as much as hitler did, but he is pushing us along the same path. his view of an ideal government is one which controls every moment of your life, from conception to interrment. his disrespect for the constitutional rights my family fought to give you and preserve for you over the last 250 years is apparent. osama does not believe in the first amendment, or the second. the rest are not far behind in his registry of contempt.

Oh well if you're talking about Osama bin Laden then that's a whole different story. Still ridiculous but different.

it would have made it a criminal offense to begin a political dialouge on the net without first registering with a governmental oversight body, paying a filing fee, and giving 30 days advance notice regarding the intent and nature of the communication.

Cite? Anything? Cause I think this woulda made huge news but I can't recall ever hearing about it.

the first amendment specifically protects your right to publically complain about the actions of your governmental representatives and demand explanation from them.

Oh and the First Amendment doesn't apply to privately owned websites or servers.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

So... you thought the Da Vinci Code was historically legitimate...?

So is "Jurassic Park".

Diana

Or "The Patriot"

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

osama may not accomplish as much as hitler did, but he is pushing us along the same path. his view of an ideal government is one which controls every moment of your life, from conception to interrment. his disrespect for the constitutional rights my family fought to give you and preserve for you over the last 250 years is apparent. osama does not believe in the first amendment, or the second. the rest are not far behind in his registry of contempt.

Oh well if you're talking about Osama bin Laden then that's a whole different story. Still ridiculous but different.

it would have made it a criminal offense to begin a political dialouge on the net without first registering with a governmental oversight body, paying a filing fee, and giving 30 days advance notice regarding the intent and nature of the communication.

Cite? Anything? Cause I think this woulda made huge news but I can't recall ever hearing about it.

the first amendment specifically protects your right to publically complain about the actions of your governmental representatives and demand explanation from them.

Oh and the First Amendment doesn't apply to privately owned websites or servers.

Indeed.... There's no way people posting about politics on the internet would suddenly be guilty "a criminal offence" because of a senate bill - that's just f*cking nuts.

How much scaremongering does there need to be...

[SteveLaura 0]

Or "The Patriot"

Or 'Braveheart'

What game are we playing, BTW?

[Mononoke28 135]

Man, totally off topic but that Bush pic makes me sick every time I see it. Raw corn on the cob?? Blech!

Diana