Jump to content
w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r

Joe the Plumber isn't a plumber anymore, is related to Charles Keating and may have family in Wasilla (really)

 Share

22 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: England
Timeline
Unless this bloke is a GOP plant, then his personal details are irrelevant, in my opinion.

Let's decide on the irrelevancy of the facts after we've had a look at them.

Sure. Personally I think it's hilarious! But it will only really be relevant if he was nudged into the spotlight.

"It's not the years; it's the mileage." Indiana Jones

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline
McCain seems to be trying to use the Jedi Mind-Trick on ordinary Americans - trying to convince people that its all OK, when it really isn't.

There's a Republican running for office in Maryland.. who has gone on record saying he has "lived through the Depression ... and it wasn't that bad."

It's a GOP thing.

Man is made by his belief. As he believes, so he is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Which is where McCain's problems really lie, he couldn't focus on the real Joe average because he has no intention of helping the real Joe average so he focuses on some guy who might be in a higher tax bracket if he starts a business that makes over $250,000/year. I say, what?

Refusing to use the spellchick!

I have put you on ignore. No really, I have, but you are still ruining my enjoyment of this site. .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Colombia
Timeline

And IF that business he starts earns an adjusted net income of $250,000 or more. ;)

Wishing you ten-fold that which you wish upon all others.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Country: United Kingdom
Timeline
Which is where McCain's problems really lie, he couldn't focus on the real Joe average because he has no intention of helping the real Joe average so he focuses on some guy who might be in a higher tax bracket if he starts a business that makes over $250,000/year. I say, what?

McCain made Joe a hero for a day, but it seems clear that what he really thinks is that Joe's just another shitheel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Country: Philippines
Timeline
He was on the tv this morning. I don't know anything more than that what he said made sense on the clip shown. Find out for yourself what the issues are and make a decision based on that knowledge and not on recieved belief. He didn't promote either candidate.

I dunno sister Cleo... here's a little more realistic take on the facts:

<h1 class="storyheadline">Fact check: Plumber Joe's taxes</h1><h2 class="storysubhead">McCain has entrepreneurs spooked about tax hikes, but fewer than 2% of small business owners would pay more under Obama's plan.</h2>By Stacy CowleyLast Updated: October 16, 2008: 12:30 PM ET (CNNMoney.com) -- In speech after speech, presidential candidate John McCain hammers on the claim that his rival Barack Obama will raise taxes on many small businesses.

At the debate on Wednesday night, McCain said, "The small businesses that we're talking about would receive an increase in their taxes right now."

More typically he has said: "What [Obama] hasn't told you is that he would tax half of the income of small businesses in America," a line used in La Crosse, Wisc., last week.

Should small business owners fear for their wallets if Obama is elected? Not the vast majority, business and tax experts say.

To make its claim, according to a McCain spokesman, the campaign counts as a small-business owner any taxpayer who files a Schedule C, E or F - the forms used to report gains and losses from business ventures and farms.

Using that definition and citing IRS data, the campaign notes that "56.8% of total small business income is earned by businesses in the top two rates, which Barack Obama has pledged to raise."

It's true that Obama has proposed raising taxes on the top two income rates.

But there are three main problems with McCain's charge.

What is a small business?First, it relies on a broad definition of what counts as a small business, including everyone who files a Schedule C, E and F.

But most people who file those forms don't run a business for a living: Those forms are also used to report income from freelance and consulting work, real-estate rentals, and most other non-salary sources.

For example, McCain and Obama both file Schedule C returns, thanks to their book royalties - but they hardly should be considered small business owners.

In 2005, there were 21.5 million Schedule C returns filed, according to the IRS.

A more realistic definition of small businesses turns up far fewer firms. The Small Business Administration estimates that there were 6 million small businesses in 2005, as measured by those with fewer than 500 employees and with staff on the payroll other than the owner.

Who pays?Second, even using the broad definition of small business that McCain likes, very few owners would see their own taxes rise.

That's because the lion's share of taxable income comes from a small number of wealthy businesses. Out of 34.7 million filers with business income on Schedules C, E or F, 479,000 filers fall into the top two brackets, according to an analysis of projected 2009 filings by the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center.

The other 34.3 million - or 98.6% - would be unaffected by Obama's proposed rate hike.

That includes Joe "The Plumber" Wurzelbacher, whom McCain invoked nearly two dozen times at the debate Wednesday night to illustrate the plight of the average worker and small business owner.

"Joe wants to buy the business that he has been in for all of these years ... he wanted to buy the business but he looked at your tax plan and he saw that he was going to pay much higher taxes," McCain said.

In an interview afterward with WTOL, Wurzelbacher acknowledged that he'd still like to eventually buy the plumbing company he works for but that he wouldn't yet be hit by higher taxes.

"I want to set the record straight: Currently I would not fall into Barack Obama's $250,000-plus," he said. "But if I'm lucky in business and taxes don't go up then maybe I can grow the business and be in that tax bracket - well, let me rephrase it. Hopefully, that tax won't be there."

Few owners are that lucky in business. In a member survey conducted late last year, the National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB) found that only 14% of respondents said they had $200,000 or more in annual income.

As Tax Policy Center fellow Len Berman recently toldFortune Small Business: "Most owners of small businesses have small incomes."

What gets taxed?Third, even if you're one of the rare business owners making enough money to be affected by Obama's proposed tax increases, you still won't see a big hike in your tax bill.

McCain's claim that Obama "will increase taxes on 50% of small business revenue" - the line he used in the second presidential debate - is incorrect because of how income is taxed.

If a business owner falls into the top bracket, that doesn't mean that all of his or her income is taxed at the highest level.

For example: If a small-business owner makes $210,000 in taxable income, he edges into the 33% bracket, one of the two top tax rates that Obama would like to raise.

But he would pay the higher tax only on the amount that exceeds the cutoff - in 2007, the two top tax rates applied to single filers with income of $160,850 or more and joint filers with income of at least $195,850. As a single filer, this business owner would see his federal taxes increase $1,475 under Obama's plan, which calls for raising the 33% tax rate to 36%.

"While Obama does favor raising the top two rates, the quote is not true because not all the small business income of those in the top two rates is taxed at the 33% and 35% rates," said Gerald Prante, a senior economist at the nonpartisan Tax Foundation.

The bottom line: McCain's claim only works by using an overly broad definition of what counts as a "small business" - and even with that definition, fewer than 2% of business owners would be hit by Obama's proposed rate increase. For those who are affected, the increase would be levied only on a part of their earnings, not all of them.

LINK

basketball-pwnd.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Colombia
Timeline

Oh play nice now Steven. I was merely presenting more realistic facts based on a little sleuthing of my own.

Wishing you ten-fold that which you wish upon all others.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...