Liberal Outrage

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

If this is ok, then free speech that Obama is a N i g g e r or a terrorist is just as ok, no?

It is ok per the First Amendment, yes. Which is what we're talking about.

VJ TOS is a whole other matter altogether

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

No outrage about this, displayed at a Sarah Palin rally in Philadelphia on Oct. 11:

If this is ok, then free speech that Obama is a N i g g e r or a terrorist is just as ok, no?

If that's the sort of language you want to employ to make a point...

[IAMX 3,055]

No outrage about this, displayed at a Sarah Palin rally in Philadelphia on Oct. 11:

If this is ok, then free speech that Obama is a N i g g e r or a terrorist is just as ok, no?

Wow, since when is ###### a racist word?

Sounds like an excuse just utter a racist word. Admit it, you enjoyed it.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

It is fun. You too can trawl the internet and look for pictures of people with racist t-shirts or anti-Obama signs, because the fact that noone on the "other side" mentions them obviously means that not only were they aware of them, but that they aren't commenting because it goes against their particular biases (and because they secretly agree with it).

It gets sillier and sillier.

[IAMX 3,055]

It is fun. You too can trawl the internet and look for pictures of people with racist t-shirts or anti-Obama signs, because the fact that noone on the "other side" mentions them obviously means that not only were they aware of them, but that they aren't commenting because it goes against their particular biases (and because they secretly agree with it).

It gets sillier and sillier.

McCain supporters are getting more and more desperate.

[Pinocchio Liberal 268]

Lucky your stirrin-up the maggots!

[Peikko 1,575]

I can't believe this thread has lasted this long.

So, we have learned that libruls are intollerant shits, is that the lesson for the day? The empirical evidence is overwhelming, priceless.

Oh, we've also learned the Cleo is number one high horse librul bully. Hurrah!

We also seem to have learned that calling Palin a ###### is equivelant to calling Obama a ***. Who knew?

[Hilarious Clinton 452]

Lucky your stirrin-up the maggots!

They stir themselves. Tolerance my a$$.

[Pinocchio Liberal 268]

They LOVE anything rotton! Divin into Obamas promises the only thing is. Is that hes spendin theyre money to do it Frickin libs!

[Amby 490]

what happened to the ####### in a cup contest?

[almaty 19]

Aficionado did not want to show his short comings

[HAL 9000 96]

[AlHayatZween 2]

Wow... you guys are still here?!

Don't you all have bellyaches by now?

No outrage about this, displayed at a Sarah Palin rally in Philadelphia on Oct. 11:

If this is ok, then free speech that Obama is a N i g g e r or a terrorist is just as ok, no?

Free speech is free speech... and thank goodness we have the right...

But i agree, these t-shirts are in just as much poor taste as any of the other slurs we've seen/heard spewed from one party or another (or their supporters).

[Chica Yeyé 41]

If this is ok, then free speech that Obama is a N i g g e r or a terrorist is just as ok, no?

It is ok per the First Amendment, yes. Which is what we're talking about.

VJ TOS is a whole other matter altogether

Ditto AJ

what happened to the ####### in a cup contest?

It was suspended due to the rumor that independent candidates wanted to also be invited.

[HAL 9000 96]

Someone counting the time stamp to time stamp delay in a logical response?

FWIW, yeah, I'd say its protected Free Speech. Not to make it any less stupid to say though. Or racist. Which begs the rhetorical question that if one person can dredge up images online of idiots wearing stupid shirts that may or may not be part of an attack (or counterattacking) against one politician, does that make it equally justifiable for one to slip in a racist remark in some kind of retort?