Palin's debating technique illustrated

[IAMX 3,055]

It's easy to say that Palin supporters are dumber, but that would be inaccurate.

I'd disagree. Sorry Palin supporters. You are indeed pretty dumb.

There's really no way to sugar coat it. And that's just nicely putting it.

Edited October 4, 2008 by SRVT

[britty 1]

It's easy to say that Palin supporters are dumber, but that would be inaccurate.

I'd disagree. Sorry Palin supporters. You are indeed pretty dumb.

There's really no way to sugar coat it. And that's just nicely putting it.

so Palin supporters are dumb??? Could you please qualify that statement? I rather think you cannot. You see, you do not know every Palin supporter. I would therefore say your post is dumb.

[Ban Hammer 13,348]

It's easy to say that Palin supporters are dumber, but that would be inaccurate.

I'd disagree. Sorry Palin supporters. You are indeed pretty dumb.

There's really no way to sugar coat it. And that's just nicely putting it.

and because you say it, it is so?

one could say the same about obama supporters.

[HAL 9000 96]

It's easy to say that Palin supporters are dumber, but that would be inaccurate.

I'd disagree. Sorry Palin supporters. You are indeed pretty dumb.

There's really no way to sugar coat it. And that's just nicely putting it.

so Palin supporters are dumb??? Could you please qualify that statement? I rather think you cannot. You see, you do not know every Palin supporter. I would therefore say your post is dumb.

Dumb? Why? I think this is a proper example of the necessity to have proper reading comprehension.

[britty 1]

It's easy to say that Palin supporters are dumber, but that would be inaccurate.

I'd disagree. Sorry Palin supporters. You are indeed pretty dumb.

There's really no way to sugar coat it. And that's just nicely putting it.

so Palin supporters are dumb??? Could you please qualify that statement? I rather think you cannot. You see, you do not know every Palin supporter. I would therefore say your post is dumb.

Dumb? Why? I think this is a proper example of the necessity to have proper reading comprehension.

I was referring to the bolded line above. My reading comprehension is perfectly fine - how is yours?

[kaydee457 13]

It's easy to say that Palin supporters are dumber, but that would be inaccurate.

I'd disagree. Sorry Palin supporters. You are indeed pretty dumb.

There's really no way to sugar coat it. And that's just nicely putting it.

so Palin supporters are dumb??? Could you please qualify that statement? I rather think you cannot. You see, you do not know every Palin supporter. I would therefore say your post is dumb.

Dumb? Why? I think this is a proper example of the necessity to have proper reading comprehension.

I was referring to the bolded line above. My reading comprehension is perfectly fine - how is yours?

I just find it amusing that AJ, and the other libruls in this forum attack Palin as though she were at the top of the ticket.....

Plain Dumb!

[nowhereman 1]

It's easy to say that Palin supporters are dumber, but that would be inaccurate.

I'd disagree. Sorry Palin supporters. You are indeed pretty dumb.

There's really no way to sugar coat it. And that's just nicely putting it.

so Palin supporters are dumb??? Could you please qualify that statement? I rather think you cannot. You see, you do not know every Palin supporter. I would therefore say your post is dumb.

Dumb? Why? I think this is a proper example of the necessity to have proper reading comprehension.

I was referring to the bolded line above. My reading comprehension is perfectly fine - how is yours?

I just find it amusing that AJ, and the other libruls in this forum attack Palin as though she were at the top of the ticket.....

Plain Dumb!

Kaydee there you go with your selective outrage again. You & your pesos here on the forum have accused me of being a liberal (I'm not btw), but when I say Palin supporters aren't dumb you use that as ammo for your point of view. If you could actually try to be open minded once in a while I might take you seriously.

[HAL 9000 96]

It's easy to say that Palin supporters are dumber, but that would be inaccurate.

I'd disagree. Sorry Palin supporters. You are indeed pretty dumb.

There's really no way to sugar coat it. And that's just nicely putting it.

so Palin supporters are dumb??? Could you please qualify that statement? I rather think you cannot. You see, you do not know every Palin supporter. I would therefore say your post is dumb.

Dumb? Why? I think this is a proper example of the necessity to have proper reading comprehension.

I was referring to the bolded line above. My reading comprehension is perfectly fine - how is yours?

Not bad considering I read approximately 100-150 pages of scientific text daily. But yes, perhaps the quote in your context can be substantiated with something other than your typical retorts. Other than that, thanks for clarifying. I do stand with the original statement. Not everyone is an idiot. But as to having some substance to substantiate having a person completely out of her league in case she had to step in to the Presidency... oh boy.

Edited October 4, 2008 by maviwaro

[dalegg 143]

McCain is definitely not where he needs to be in the polls with only a month to go. Obama now even has the edge in Florida. This might not even be close.

[nowhereman 1]

McCain is definitely not where he needs to be in the polls with only a month to go. Obama now even has the edge in Florida. This might not even be close.

Don't underestimate the Republicans... I'm sure Karl Rove & his buddies are cooking up some sort of scandal that they will release a week before the election.

[kaydee457 13]

It's easy to say that Palin supporters are dumber, but that would be inaccurate.

I'd disagree. Sorry Palin supporters. You are indeed pretty dumb.

There's really no way to sugar coat it. And that's just nicely putting it.

so Palin supporters are dumb??? Could you please qualify that statement? I rather think you cannot. You see, you do not know every Palin supporter. I would therefore say your post is dumb.

Dumb? Why? I think this is a proper example of the necessity to have proper reading comprehension.

I was referring to the bolded line above. My reading comprehension is perfectly fine - how is yours?

I just find it amusing that AJ, and the other libruls in this forum attack Palin as though she were at the top of the ticket.....

Plain Dumb!

Kaydee there you go with your selective outrage again. You & your pesos here on the forum have accused me of being a liberal (I'm not btw), but when I say Palin supporters aren't dumb you use that as ammo for your point of view. If you could actually try to be open minded once in a while I might take you seriously.

Paranoid, are we....I wasn't replying to you, nor was I disagreeing with you.....

[dalegg 143]

McCain is definitely not where he needs to be in the polls with only a month to go. Obama now even has the edge in Florida. This might not even be close.

Don't underestimate the Republicans... I'm sure Karl Rove & his buddies are cooking up some sort of scandal that they will release a week before the election.

I sure hope so.

[nowhereman 1]

It's easy to say that Palin supporters are dumber, but that would be inaccurate.

I'd disagree. Sorry Palin supporters. You are indeed pretty dumb.

There's really no way to sugar coat it. And that's just nicely putting it.

so Palin supporters are dumb??? Could you please qualify that statement? I rather think you cannot. You see, you do not know every Palin supporter. I would therefore say your post is dumb.

Dumb? Why? I think this is a proper example of the necessity to have proper reading comprehension.

I was referring to the bolded line above. My reading comprehension is perfectly fine - how is yours?

I just find it amusing that AJ, and the other libruls in this forum attack Palin as though she were at the top of the ticket.....

Plain Dumb!

Kaydee there you go with your selective outrage again. You & your pesos here on the forum have accused me of being a liberal (I'm not btw), but when I say Palin supporters aren't dumb you use that as ammo for your point of view. If you could actually try to be open minded once in a while I might take you seriously.

Paranoid, are we....I wasn't replying to you, nor was I disagreeing with you.....

That's my point... you agree with people with other views when it's convenient. Personally I think Palin is pretty smart, I just don't buy her "Joe six-pack" routine. Others find her style appealing & everyone is entitled to their opinion (that's what makes this country great).

[britty 1]

It's easy to say that Palin supporters are dumber, but that would be inaccurate.

I'd disagree. Sorry Palin supporters. You are indeed pretty dumb.

There's really no way to sugar coat it. And that's just nicely putting it.

so Palin supporters are dumb??? Could you please qualify that statement? I rather think you cannot. You see, you do not know every Palin supporter. I would therefore say your post is dumb.

Dumb? Why? I think this is a proper example of the necessity to have proper reading comprehension.

I was referring to the bolded line above. My reading comprehension is perfectly fine - how is yours?

Not bad considering I read approximately 100-150 pages of scientific text daily. But yes, perhaps the quote in your context can be substantiated with something other than your typical retorts. Other than that, thanks for clarifying. I do stand with the original statement. Not everyone is an idiot. But as to having some substance to substantiate having a person completely out of her league in case she had to step in to the Presidency... oh boy.

always a pleasure.

[kaydee457 13]

It's easy to say that Palin supporters are dumber, but that would be inaccurate.

I'd disagree. Sorry Palin supporters. You are indeed pretty dumb.

There's really no way to sugar coat it. And that's just nicely putting it.

so Palin supporters are dumb??? Could you please qualify that statement? I rather think you cannot. You see, you do not know every Palin supporter. I would therefore say your post is dumb.

Dumb? Why? I think this is a proper example of the necessity to have proper reading comprehension.

I was referring to the bolded line above. My reading comprehension is perfectly fine - how is yours?

I just find it amusing that AJ, and the other libruls in this forum attack Palin as though she were at the top of the ticket.....

Plain Dumb!

Kaydee there you go with your selective outrage again. You & your pesos here on the forum have accused me of being a liberal (I'm not btw), but when I say Palin supporters aren't dumb you use that as ammo for your point of view. If you could actually try to be open minded once in a while I might take you seriously.

Paranoid, are we....I wasn't replying to you, nor was I disagreeing with you.....

That's my point... you agree with people with other views when it's convenient. Personally I think Palin is pretty smart, I just don't buy her "Joe six-pack" routine. Others find her style appealing & everyone is entitled to their opinion (that's what makes this country great).

I'm lost.......