Jump to content
kelly1290

Nigeria U.S. Embassy Fraud Investigators

 Share

20 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Nigeria
Timeline

Did they deny your visa because of this encounter? If so then you can address this with your congresswoman and explain your case...what if your MIL doesn't understand English? They normally visit more than once and they are probably concerned more about the neighbors not familiar with the wedding than your MIL refusing to share information.

Keep your head up...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-3 Visa Country: Nigeria
Timeline
This family member was my mother-in-law who is 72 years old and the location is Lagos, Nigeria, where you don't give out personal information about someone else unless you know who you are speaking to and why they want to know. The lady investigator for the embassy greeted her and asked her if she was the mother of my husband and she replied yes, hope there is no problem? The investigator never bothered to identify herself as being from the embassy. That is when the investigator said, "Madam just answer my questions." My mother-in-law told her no because she would not identify herself. So the investigator left. She later found out from her youngest son, who had already been interviewed by the lady, that this was a lady from the embassy, so my mother-in-law ran after her and said that I don't know who you are, but I can testify to the fact that my son is happily married, but the lady investigator would not acknowledge her after that. Just got in her car and left. I feel that to be an unfair investigation. In my opinion, if you are going to do an interview, you should identify who you are and why you are there asking questions. If feel this to be an unfair investigation. That is why I wondered who I should go to to complain about their fraud department in the embassy in Nigeria. My mother-in-law is very upset and feels that she ruined our chances for my husband to come to the USA all because the lady wouldn't identify herself.

She had told my husband that she was afraid because the lady was so rude to her and refused to identify herself. She told my husband that she did not want to give out his personal information without knowing who she was talking to and why she wanted to know. Had she identified herself, she would have had no problem. What you don't know is that police in Lagos, Nigeria, are not anywhere in the league of American police. They are very corrupt. They will do anything and say anything for a bribe. They are never to be trusted. They don't serve and protect like American police. In Lagos, you have to be careful who you are talking to and why they want to know something.

If someone came to my home and started asking a lot of questions without identifying themselves, I would have the same reaction as her.

My big concern would be why would they refused to answer questions because she thought it was a Police woman. That would send up red flags to any investigator. That speaking from 26 working as a police officer.

Yoy stated that her youngest son (She later found out from her youngest son, who had already been interviewed) already being interviewed so may be he alreay gave the correct information. Normaly these invest people asked simple question like, does your son married? What you think went worng or in other mean what questions did the invest asked that your mother in law would not answer.

She did not ask my mother-in-law anything except was she the mother of my husband and she replied yes she was and hope there is no problem? My mother-in-law then asked the investigator who she was and the investigator would not tell her. She only told my mother-in-law, "Madam, just answer my questions.". My mother-in-law did not like the way she approached her and just started asking questions about her son and the fact that she refused to identify herself. I would have reacted the same way if someone I didn't know came to my home asking questions about my son and refused to identify themselves. Most people would not give out information to someone they don't know until they knew who they were and for what purpose they wanted the information.

If that was the case, it seems to me the invest will not make a decision with this encounter and will try to reach to somebody else to get the infromation she needs. What question did she ask the son? does the son talked to her about your husband

Yes, she ask questions of my husband's brother and he answered them. He was asked was he aware of our wedding and he answered yes he was, but that the wife is not in Nigeria, but in USA. The investigator replied okay. Then she asked what my husband was to him and he answered that he was his older brother, and she replied okay. She then asked why it was that no neighbors knew about this marriage and he answered that this was family business and not for everyone to know, and she said okay. Then she wanted to talk to my husband's mother, and you know that story.

Does'nt sound like a problem to me. The can and do use these methods. Nigeria is not the USA.

Yes, pushbrk, I do realize that Nigeria is not the USA, but they still should identify themselves as an employee of the embassy before starting their interrogation. She didn't realize who she was and had asked her twice to identify herself and she refused. I would have wanted to know who I was sharing personal information with myself.

___________________

I-130

Marriage : 3/10/07

I-130 Sent : 5/17/07 transferred from NSC to CSC

I-130 NOA1 : 6/12/07 pending at CSC

Touched: 11/07/2007!!!!!! (However, no touches on I-129F)

Touched: 11/30/2007 Touched: 12/02/07 (on a Sunday) (Guess the lady actually did put on someone's desk afterall).

Touched: 12/06/07 (Hopefully this is them working on it)

Touched: 12/07/07 (Yesssss, come on approval!!!!)

Touched: 12/08/07 (Working on it even on a Saturday. What dedication!!!)

Touched: 12/12/07 (RFE)

Received RFE: 12/26/07

Sent back RFE: 12/26/07

Received in USCIS RFE mailroom: 12/27/07

Resumed case: 01/07/08

Touched: 01/08/2008

Touched: 01/09/2008 (APPROVED)

Touched: 01/10/2008

Received NOA2 by snail mail: 01/14/2008

Interview date: 08/12/2008 Put in the "black hole" of Administrative Processing

2nd Interview date: 12/08/2008 (Rescheduled on 12/22/08 due to 12/8 being a Muslin Holiday)

12/22/08: Visa denied on the basis that his mother didn't confirm our marriage. She didn't answer any questions because embassy official didn't identify herself.

07/06/09: Received Notice of Intent to Revoke

07/27/09: Sent in evidence disputing investigation findings

07/30/09: Case processing has resumed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-3 Visa Country: Nigeria
Timeline
Did they deny your visa because of this encounter? If so then you can address this with your congresswoman and explain your case...what if your MIL doesn't understand English? They normally visit more than once and they are probably concerned more about the neighbors not familiar with the wedding than your MIL refusing to share information.

Keep your head up...

No, he was not denied a visa. We were placed on AP because of an age difference. The investigating officer is a local Nigerian and knows the language and customs already. My MIL does not speak much English, but that doesn't matter since the investigating officer speaks her native language. The so-called neighbor she spoke too was not that close to the family. In fact, he was not even a neighbor. She just stopped this guy in the street and started asking him questions. She asked him if he knew my husband by using his native name which no one knows him by. He is called by his middle name. When she asked the guy using my husband's middle name, then he said, yes he knew of him. She asked him if he knew if he was married or not. The guy answered that no, he did not know one way or another as he was not that close to him.

You are, however, right about her being more concerned about neighbors not knowing as his brother was asked why the neighbors no nothing of our wedding. He answered because that is family business. We dont' shout our business in the street. She answered okay. Our wedding was in Abuja, not in Lagos, so I wouldn't expect a lot of people besides family and close friends to know about it.

I won't get too worried yet as nothing negative has happened yet and I don't know that she won't shed a positive light on our case just with my brother-in-law's answers. I am sure he will be called back shortly, so we will sit tight and see what happens. Thanks everyone for your input and advise. It was much appreciated as always.

Deb

___________________

I-130

Marriage : 3/10/07

I-130 Sent : 5/17/07 transferred from NSC to CSC

I-130 NOA1 : 6/12/07 pending at CSC

Touched: 11/07/2007!!!!!! (However, no touches on I-129F)

Touched: 11/30/2007 Touched: 12/02/07 (on a Sunday) (Guess the lady actually did put on someone's desk afterall).

Touched: 12/06/07 (Hopefully this is them working on it)

Touched: 12/07/07 (Yesssss, come on approval!!!!)

Touched: 12/08/07 (Working on it even on a Saturday. What dedication!!!)

Touched: 12/12/07 (RFE)

Received RFE: 12/26/07

Sent back RFE: 12/26/07

Received in USCIS RFE mailroom: 12/27/07

Resumed case: 01/07/08

Touched: 01/08/2008

Touched: 01/09/2008 (APPROVED)

Touched: 01/10/2008

Received NOA2 by snail mail: 01/14/2008

Interview date: 08/12/2008 Put in the "black hole" of Administrative Processing

2nd Interview date: 12/08/2008 (Rescheduled on 12/22/08 due to 12/8 being a Muslin Holiday)

12/22/08: Visa denied on the basis that his mother didn't confirm our marriage. She didn't answer any questions because embassy official didn't identify herself.

07/06/09: Received Notice of Intent to Revoke

07/27/09: Sent in evidence disputing investigation findings

07/30/09: Case processing has resumed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Country: China
Timeline
This family member was my mother-in-law who is 72 years old and the location is Lagos, Nigeria, where you don't give out personal information about someone else unless you know who you are speaking to and why they want to know. The lady investigator for the embassy greeted her and asked her if she was the mother of my husband and she replied yes, hope there is no problem? The investigator never bothered to identify herself as being from the embassy. That is when the investigator said, "Madam just answer my questions." My mother-in-law told her no because she would not identify herself. So the investigator left. She later found out from her youngest son, who had already been interviewed by the lady, that this was a lady from the embassy, so my mother-in-law ran after her and said that I don't know who you are, but I can testify to the fact that my son is happily married, but the lady investigator would not acknowledge her after that. Just got in her car and left. I feel that to be an unfair investigation. In my opinion, if you are going to do an interview, you should identify who you are and why you are there asking questions. If feel this to be an unfair investigation. That is why I wondered who I should go to to complain about their fraud department in the embassy in Nigeria. My mother-in-law is very upset and feels that she ruined our chances for my husband to come to the USA all because the lady wouldn't identify herself.

She had told my husband that she was afraid because the lady was so rude to her and refused to identify herself. She told my husband that she did not want to give out his personal information without knowing who she was talking to and why she wanted to know. Had she identified herself, she would have had no problem. What you don't know is that police in Lagos, Nigeria, are not anywhere in the league of American police. They are very corrupt. They will do anything and say anything for a bribe. They are never to be trusted. They don't serve and protect like American police. In Lagos, you have to be careful who you are talking to and why they want to know something.

If someone came to my home and started asking a lot of questions without identifying themselves, I would have the same reaction as her.

My big concern would be why would they refused to answer questions because she thought it was a Police woman. That would send up red flags to any investigator. That speaking from 26 working as a police officer.

Yoy stated that her youngest son (She later found out from her youngest son, who had already been interviewed) already being interviewed so may be he alreay gave the correct information. Normaly these invest people asked simple question like, does your son married? What you think went worng or in other mean what questions did the invest asked that your mother in law would not answer.

She did not ask my mother-in-law anything except was she the mother of my husband and she replied yes she was and hope there is no problem? My mother-in-law then asked the investigator who she was and the investigator would not tell her. She only told my mother-in-law, "Madam, just answer my questions.". My mother-in-law did not like the way she approached her and just started asking questions about her son and the fact that she refused to identify herself. I would have reacted the same way if someone I didn't know came to my home asking questions about my son and refused to identify themselves. Most people would not give out information to someone they don't know until they knew who they were and for what purpose they wanted the information.

If that was the case, it seems to me the invest will not make a decision with this encounter and will try to reach to somebody else to get the infromation she needs. What question did she ask the son? does the son talked to her about your husband

Yes, she ask questions of my husband's brother and he answered them. He was asked was he aware of our wedding and he answered yes he was, but that the wife is not in Nigeria, but in USA. The investigator replied okay. Then she asked what my husband was to him and he answered that he was his older brother, and she replied okay. She then asked why it was that no neighbors knew about this marriage and he answered that this was family business and not for everyone to know, and she said okay. Then she wanted to talk to my husband's mother, and you know that story.

Does'nt sound like a problem to me. The can and do use these methods. Nigeria is not the USA.

Yes, pushbrk, I do realize that Nigeria is not the USA, but they still should identify themselves as an employee of the embassy before starting their interrogation. She didn't realize who she was and had asked her twice to identify herself and she refused. I would have wanted to know who I was sharing personal information with myself.

I wouldn't have liked it any more than she did but that's not the point. They are not restricted to using methods acceptable in the US. Your mother in-law isn't a US Citizen and Nigeria is not the USA so "rights" don't apply.

You have every right to complain but it won't help your visa process. I'd write the letter whenever you're ready but wait to send it until the visa is in hand.

Facts are cheap...knowing how to use them is precious...
Understanding the big picture is priceless. Anonymous

Google Who is Pushbrk?

A Warning to Green Card Holders About Voting

http://www.visajourney.com/forums/topic/606646-a-warning-to-green-card-holders-about-voting/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-3 Visa Country: Nigeria
Timeline
This family member was my mother-in-law who is 72 years old and the location is Lagos, Nigeria, where you don't give out personal information about someone else unless you know who you are speaking to and why they want to know. The lady investigator for the embassy greeted her and asked her if she was the mother of my husband and she replied yes, hope there is no problem? The investigator never bothered to identify herself as being from the embassy. That is when the investigator said, "Madam just answer my questions." My mother-in-law told her no because she would not identify herself. So the investigator left. She later found out from her youngest son, who had already been interviewed by the lady, that this was a lady from the embassy, so my mother-in-law ran after her and said that I don't know who you are, but I can testify to the fact that my son is happily married, but the lady investigator would not acknowledge her after that. Just got in her car and left. I feel that to be an unfair investigation. In my opinion, if you are going to do an interview, you should identify who you are and why you are there asking questions. If feel this to be an unfair investigation. That is why I wondered who I should go to to complain about their fraud department in the embassy in Nigeria. My mother-in-law is very upset and feels that she ruined our chances for my husband to come to the USA all because the lady wouldn't identify herself.

She had told my husband that she was afraid because the lady was so rude to her and refused to identify herself. She told my husband that she did not want to give out his personal information without knowing who she was talking to and why she wanted to know. Had she identified herself, she would have had no problem. What you don't know is that police in Lagos, Nigeria, are not anywhere in the league of American police. They are very corrupt. They will do anything and say anything for a bribe. They are never to be trusted. They don't serve and protect like American police. In Lagos, you have to be careful who you are talking to and why they want to know something.

If someone came to my home and started asking a lot of questions without identifying themselves, I would have the same reaction as her.

My big concern would be why would they refused to answer questions because she thought it was a Police woman. That would send up red flags to any investigator. That speaking from 26 working as a police officer.

Yoy stated that her youngest son (She later found out from her youngest son, who had already been interviewed) already being interviewed so may be he alreay gave the correct information. Normaly these invest people asked simple question like, does your son married? What you think went worng or in other mean what questions did the invest asked that your mother in law would not answer.

She did not ask my mother-in-law anything except was she the mother of my husband and she replied yes she was and hope there is no problem? My mother-in-law then asked the investigator who she was and the investigator would not tell her. She only told my mother-in-law, "Madam, just answer my questions.". My mother-in-law did not like the way she approached her and just started asking questions about her son and the fact that she refused to identify herself. I would have reacted the same way if someone I didn't know came to my home asking questions about my son and refused to identify themselves. Most people would not give out information to someone they don't know until they knew who they were and for what purpose they wanted the information.

If that was the case, it seems to me the invest will not make a decision with this encounter and will try to reach to somebody else to get the infromation she needs. What question did she ask the son? does the son talked to her about your husband

Yes, she ask questions of my husband's brother and he answered them. He was asked was he aware of our wedding and he answered yes he was, but that the wife is not in Nigeria, but in USA. The investigator replied okay. Then she asked what my husband was to him and he answered that he was his older brother, and she replied okay. She then asked why it was that no neighbors knew about this marriage and he answered that this was family business and not for everyone to know, and she said okay. Then she wanted to talk to my husband's mother, and you know that story.

Does'nt sound like a problem to me. The can and do use these methods. Nigeria is not the USA.

Yes, pushbrk, I do realize that Nigeria is not the USA, but they still should identify themselves as an employee of the embassy before starting their interrogation. She didn't realize who she was and had asked her twice to identify herself and she refused. I would have wanted to know who I was sharing personal information with myself.

I wouldn't have liked it any more than she did but that's not the point. They are not restricted to using methods acceptable in the US. Your mother in-law isn't a US Citizen and Nigeria is not the USA so "rights" don't apply.

You have every right to complain but it won't help your visa process. I'd write the letter whenever you're ready but wait to send it until the visa is in hand.

Thanks Pushbrk! I slept on it and had already decided myself to just wait and see what happens. Nothing negative has happened yet. I don't know what recommendations she has in mind to give. I don't want to fix something if it ain't broke, so to speak. I could do more harm than good jumping the gun. Thank you pushbrk for your input as always and thanks everyone else for your input and recommendations. It was appreciated.

___________________

I-130

Marriage : 3/10/07

I-130 Sent : 5/17/07 transferred from NSC to CSC

I-130 NOA1 : 6/12/07 pending at CSC

Touched: 11/07/2007!!!!!! (However, no touches on I-129F)

Touched: 11/30/2007 Touched: 12/02/07 (on a Sunday) (Guess the lady actually did put on someone's desk afterall).

Touched: 12/06/07 (Hopefully this is them working on it)

Touched: 12/07/07 (Yesssss, come on approval!!!!)

Touched: 12/08/07 (Working on it even on a Saturday. What dedication!!!)

Touched: 12/12/07 (RFE)

Received RFE: 12/26/07

Sent back RFE: 12/26/07

Received in USCIS RFE mailroom: 12/27/07

Resumed case: 01/07/08

Touched: 01/08/2008

Touched: 01/09/2008 (APPROVED)

Touched: 01/10/2008

Received NOA2 by snail mail: 01/14/2008

Interview date: 08/12/2008 Put in the "black hole" of Administrative Processing

2nd Interview date: 12/08/2008 (Rescheduled on 12/22/08 due to 12/8 being a Muslin Holiday)

12/22/08: Visa denied on the basis that his mother didn't confirm our marriage. She didn't answer any questions because embassy official didn't identify herself.

07/06/09: Received Notice of Intent to Revoke

07/27/09: Sent in evidence disputing investigation findings

07/30/09: Case processing has resumed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...