10 Ways to Bail Out Wall Street (and Main Street) Without Soaking Taxpayers in Debt

[one...two...tree 2,762]

As Congress debates the particulars of the Bush-Paulson bailout, one key question has gone largely unexplored: Who will pay for this mess?

Lawmakers in Congress appear to have assumed that the federal government will simply borrow more money to foot the bill for the bailout. The national debt ceiling will rise to a whopping $11.3 trillion, up from $8 trillion a year ago.

But this rush to borrowing merely shifts the bailout burden onto the backs of future taxpayers. Congress needs to change course -- and develop a "pay as we go" plan that makes Wall Street pay.

The lion's share of bailout funding should come from the high-finance gamblers and the wealthy CEOs who have so profited from our casino economy.

Funding the Bailout: Basic Principles

• Wall Street and speculators should pay now for the mess they created.
• Instead of borrowing from the super-wealthy beneficiaries of the casino economy, we should tax them.
• Any bailout should stimulate the real economy with investments in Main Street, not just Wall Street.

Broadening the Bailout Dollars

The debate over the bailout has so far concentrated on the $700 billion purchase of "troubled assets" proposed by Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson. A real "bailout" would also target the troubled households of working American families. A $200 billion "Main Street Stimulus Package" could bolster the real economy and those left vulnerable by the subprime mortgage meltdown. This package should include:

• A $130 billion annual investment in renewable energy to stimulate good jobs anchored in local economies and reduce our dependency on oil.
• A $50 billion outlay to help keep people in foreclosed homes through refinancing and creating new homeownership and housing opportunities. These funds could also help those locked out of the American Dream to purchase homes through nonspeculative mortgage programs.
• A $20 billion aid package to states to address the squeeze on state and local government services that declining tax revenues are now forcing.

A Responsible Plan to Pay for Recovery: $900 Billion in New Revenue

Below is our 10-point program to pay for this broader bailout. This plan would generate $900 billion a year until the costs of the bailout and stimulus program are paid for.

1. A Securities Transaction Tax: $100 Billion

A fair plan to pay for the bailout should include a modest financial transaction tax on the buying and selling of stock and other financial products. A penny on every $4 invested would generate $100 billion a year. Other European countries already tax stock transactions, and these transaction taxes effectively discourage speculation.

2. A Wealth Tax Surcharge on Households with $10 Million: $300 billion

Congress should institute a modest wealth tax surcharge on households with a net worth of more than $10 million. These households currently own and control more than 20 percent of the nation's private wealth. They have realized huge gains from the manipulation of capital markets and the asset bubbles that created the current crisis. A modest surcharge -- no more than 3 percent -- could generate more than $300 billion.

3. A Corporate Minimum Income Tax: $60 Billion

In August, the Government Accountability Office reported that two-thirds of U.S. corporations paid no income taxes between 1998 and 2005. These corporations paid nothing toward our shared expenses of defense, environmental protection, public health and education. Ordinary taxpayers should not be left holding this bag. A minimum corporate income tax should contribute toward the bailout.

4. A "Disgorgement" Recovery From Profligate CEOs: $40 Billion

Until several weeks ago, top CEOs and managers were collecting massive salaries and fees while they told the rest of us that "everything is fine." These CEOs gorged themselves and have taken the money and run. The four biggest investment banks on Wall Street shelled out $30 billion in bonuses last year. One of them, Lehman Brothers, has just gone under. Another, Bear Stearns, was bailed out earlier this year. To help pay for recovery, the new Treasury authority should seek the payback of executive compensation inappropriately extracted in the years before the Wall Street meltdown.

5. An Income Tax Surcharge on Incomes Over $5 Million: $105 Billion

A portion of the bailout cost should be financed with an emergency income tax surcharge on incomes over $5 million. Wealthy investors have been the big winners in the unregulated bubble economy. They have watched their incomes skyrocket over the last 25 years. Meanwhile, President George W. Bush has cut their taxes for seven years. Instituting a 50 percent tax rate on income over $5 million and a 70 percent rate on income over $10 million would generate $105 billion a year until the bailout is paid for.

6. An End to Overseas Corporate Tax Havens: $100 Billion

Congress should close down corporate tax havens that allow corporations to game the system and cut their taxes, sometimes to zero. This step would generate $100 billion from profitable companies that have paid no taxes over the last decade.

7. The Elimination of Subsidies for Excessive CEO Pay: $20 Billion

As taxpayers, we subsidize excessive CEO pay, through a host of tax loopholes, to the tune of $20 billion a year. Congress should close these loopholes, including the accounting gimmicks that permit companies to report one set of earnings to shareholders and a different, lower number to Uncle Sam.

8. The Elimination of the Tax Preference for Capital Gains: $95 Billion

The mega-windfalls that Wall Street executives have pocketed over recent years will be generating additional income, in the form of dividends and capital games, for years to come. Under current tax law, dividend and capital gains income faces a mere 15 percent tax rate, while income from actual work can be taxed at rates up to 35 percent. Taxing wealth and work at the same rates would generate $95 billion a year in revenue.

9. A Progressive Inheritance Tax: $60 Billion

In the near future, the moguls of the past quarter-century will be passing off the scene and leaving behind dynastic-size fortunes. A portion of this wealth should be taxed. A progressive estate tax on estates over $2 million -- $4 million for a couple -- could generate $60 billion a year in the short term and much more in outlying decades.

10. The Elimination of the Mansion Subsidy: $20 Billion

Wealthy taxpayers can currently deduct their mansion mortgage interest off their taxes. The richest 2 percent of U.S. households do not need to be subsidized by American taxpayers. Capping the home mortgage interest deduction on that portion of mortgage payments that exceeds $200,000 per year would generate $20 billion a year.

Chuck Collins is a senior scholar at the Institute for Policy Studies, where he coordinates the Working Group on Extreme Inequality.

Dedrick Muhammad is a senior organizer and research associate at the Institute for Policy Studies and author of "40 Years Later: The Unrealized American Dream." Muhammad is also the "Racial Wealth Divide" coordinator at United for a Fair Economy and co-author of UFE's report "The State of the Dream: Enduring Disparities in Black and White."

http://www.alternet.org/workplace/100223/10_ways_to_bail_out_wall_street_(and_main_street)_without_soaking_taxpayers_in_d

ebt/

[mawilson 2,133]

11. Sell Alaska along with Gov Palin back to Russia for $10,000 bln.

[luckytxn 2,264]

I knew the "more taxes fix" people would be forthcoming.

[Dan J 277]

I knew the "more taxes fix" people would be forthcoming.

Either pay for it directly, or pay for it through inflation. Like it or not, its all going to cost more.

Taxes can be controlled, inflation, not so much.

[IAMX 3,055]

I have to wonder why every economic plan from Democrats involves taxing more. Grow some balls and de-fund the damn Iraq war, rather than play the politically safe point of taxing more.

Use that Iraq money, since we're already spending it, on fixing this problem. Voila. No more taxes needed.

Then, use the rest of it and put it back into the Treasury for tax refunds.

Edited September 26, 2008 by SRVT

[Ling Ling 22]

I can tell you right away that #4 and #5 ain't gonna fly.

Probably a better chance of seeing Palin in a 3 way with Obama/Biden, than getting people to give money back, or allow 50% and 70% taxes without a huge fight.

Come to think of it...a 3 way with Palin/Obama/Biden on PayPerView, could probably raise 700 million at least.

Let's see who REALLY wants to give their all for the USA.

[britty 1]

Did you all see the faces of those in the meeting? Honest to God, Bush was virtually a grey color, and Nancy looked like she was about to hyperventilate. They are certainly all hiding something. Give it 3 years and there will be a total collapse, society will turn on eachother, and all this won't really matter unless you have a firearm and some tinned food....

[Ling Ling 22]

I have to wonder why every economic plan from Democrats involves taxing more. Grow some balls and de-fund the damn Iraq war, rather than play the politically safe point of taxing more.

Use that Iraq money, since we're already spending it, on fixing this problem. Voila. No more taxes needed.

Then, use the rest of it and put it back into the Treasury for tax refunds.

I'm feeling you here...

How about we take over the profits from the oil for a while...to pay for our "help" in Iraq.

That's the kind of creative thinking I'm talking about.

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

I like it. Have the artificial wealth that was created reduced rather than taxing all - most of which haven't benefited a dime from this ole' scheme.

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

Did you all see the faces of those in the meeting? Honest to God, Bush was virtually a grey color, and Nancy looked like she was about to hyperventilate. They are certainly all hiding something. Give it 3 years and there will be a total collapse, society will turn on eachother, and all this won't really matter unless you have a firearm and some tinned food....

:o

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

Use that Iraq money, since we're already spending it, on fixing this problem. Voila. No more taxes needed.

You're talking like the Iraq war is actually funded. You know that t isn't. China's paying for that right now and my baby and her children and grandchildren will be burdened to pay it back. I'd rather the beneficiaries of this heist pay back what they shouldn't have had in the first place.

[Emancipation 2]

11. Sell Alaska along with Gov Palin back to Russia for $10,000 bln.

I'm sure Canada would probably give you at least 15K for it.. They'd probably ask you to take Palin off the table though.

[luckytxn 2,264]

Use that Iraq money, since we're already spending it, on fixing this problem. Voila. No more taxes needed.

You're talking like the Iraq war is actually funded. You know that t isn't. China's paying for that right now and my baby and her children and grandchildren will be burdened to pay it back. I'd rather the beneficiaries of this heist pay back what they shouldn't have had in the first place.

How about we just march out of Iraq and afghanistan, pull all troops that are spread all over the world in Europe and Asia, everywhere, right now and bring them home. With the savings we just start buying down all debt. Then we reduce Government a lot. After that we can all sit down and ask ourselves what we really want. If it is health care or any other socialist program then we see what the cost and what taxes it would take and then if we feel like we can live with that then we can do it.

It is strange to me that so many of these countries that have relied so long on our largesse are able to be so socialist and here if we do the same we would probably bankrupt ourselves. We have much greater capacity to do the same things but we are so reckless in spending.

Edited September 26, 2008 by luckytxn

[mawilson 2,133]

How about we just march out of Iraq and afghanistan, pull all troops that are spread all over the world in Europe and Asia, everywhere, right now and bring them home.

We do that and someone else will fill the void. Probably Russia or China.

[luckytxn 2,264]

How about we just march out of Iraq and afghanistan, pull all troops that are spread all over the world in Europe and Asia, everywhere, right now and bring them home.

We do that and someone else will fill the void. Probably Russia or China.

Maybe so and yet I really don't care at all if they do. I somehow feel we will be fine here. If we have to play the worlds policeman then it is gonna cost us many of the things that I see so many want here.

Europe I feel can just start paying for the military and training they deem they need. Japan and Korea can do the same. Same for any others.