Polls: Obama behind in MI, CO, MN, WI and FL!

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

Obama Up Slightly In Four Battlegrounds, Quinnipiac University/Wall Street Journal/Washingtonpost.Com Poll Finds --- COLORADO: Obama 49 - McCain 45 MICHIGAN: Obama 48 - McCain 44 MINNESOTA: Obama 47 - McCain 45 WISCONSIN: Obama 49 - McCain 42

http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x4141.xml?ReleaseID=1216

From NBC News poll:

FLORIDA: Obama 47, McCain 45

http://thepage.time.com/2008/09/23/nbc-news-florida-numbers/

[stevi1123 0]

behind?

Edited September 23, 2008 by stevi1123

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

behind?

Yes. Can't you read?

[trailmix 77]

behind?

Yes. Can't you read?

I can read...but i'm struggling with the math on this one.

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

behind?

Yes. Can't you read?

I can read...but i'm struggling with the math on this one.

Let me break it down for ya.

49 < 45

48 < 44

47 < 45

49 < 42

And that's how Obama is behind in Minnesota, Colorado, Michigan, Wisconsin and Florida.

[almaty 19]

of course he is behind......he can never get elected the liberal #######.,..

[jundp 191]

n/m

Edited September 23, 2008 by jundp

[HAL 9000 96]

Love these polls!

[trailmix 77]

behind?

Yes. Can't you read?

I can read...but i'm struggling with the math on this one.

Let me break it down for ya.

49 < 45

48 < 44

47 < 45

49 < 42

And that's how Obama is behind in Minnesota, Colorado, Michigan, Wisconsin and Florida.

Well, if we break down your title:

Obama behind in MI, CO, MN, WI and FL!

But we then look at the heading of the poll results:

QUOTE

Obama Up Slightly In Four Battlegrounds

And we then look at the data which shows Obama ahead in each poll - I believe that is where the confusion arises?

However since it's just a poll and the numbers are so close, you could just switch the names on each result and then it would all make more sense.

Edited September 23, 2008 by trailmix

[Dan J 277]

behind?

Yes. Can't you read?

I can read...but i'm struggling with the math on this one.

Let me break it down for ya.

49 < 45

48 < 44

47 < 45

49 < 42

And that's how Obama is behind in Minnesota, Colorado, Michigan, Wisconsin and Florida.

Well, if we break down your title:

Obama behind in MI, CO, MN, WI and FL!

But we then look at the heading of the poll results:

QUOTE

Obama Up Slightly In Four Battlegrounds

And we then look at the data which shows Obama ahead in each poll - I believe that is where the confusion arises?

However since it's a poll and the numbers are so close, you could just switch the names on each result and then it would all make sense.

Troll is being troll, giving the conservatives a false sense of security about the next election

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

[Mononoke28 135]

behind?

Yes. Can't you read?

I can read...but i'm struggling with the math on this one.

Let me break it down for ya.

49 < 45

48 < 44

47 < 45

49 < 42

And that's how Obama is behind in Minnesota, Colorado, Michigan, Wisconsin and Florida.

Not that I care anyway, but the Original quote does not break it down like that:

Obama Up Slightly In Four Battlegrounds, Quinnipiac University/Wall Street Journal/Washingtonpost.Com Poll Finds --- COLORADO: Obama 49 - McCain 45 MICHIGAN: Obama 48 - McCain 44 MINNESOTA: Obama 47 - McCain 45 WISCONSIN: Obama 49 - McCain 42

That shows me that he's ahead, not behind.

But again, I don't care...

Diana

Edited September 23, 2008 by Mononoke28

[stevi1123 0]

My thanks to everyone who confirmed to me that I was not reading that article the wrong way.....

OP, this post really didn't make much sense to me, thus my in the first place.

But it's all good

We all make mistakes

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

47 < 45.

Y'all need to quit with the fuzzy librul math.

[rclouse 0]

538.com has Obama with a 312 to 226 electoral vote lead.

And their Super Tracker trend is sharply in Obama's favor. The RNC bounce was very short lived.