Jump to content
endoftheroad

USA Butting into China's Business Again!

 Share

38 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Does that translate to mean you wish the UN hadn't been created, or that it has largely outlived its usefulness? Do you even know what the aim of the UN was when it was created?

You ask a lot of questions and ignore most of what I wrote but that the usual method here. It doesn't bother me the UN was created and it's pretty useless at the moment but who knows in the future. I'd speculate the UN was supposed to prevent war as the defunct League of Nations tried and failed at.

From your response, I can only surmise that you don't really know much about what the UN does, nor what the Declaration of Human Rights is for and I am wondering if you know anything about world politics outside of a very narrow "if it's good for America it's good for everyone perspective"? Human rights issues are pretty much central to foreign policy so I am not quite sure how you have managed to remain ignorant of it for so long.

Since you can't do much on this topic than your standard insults it leads me to believe you don't know much about the UN or foreign policy. You could least quote me correctly or summarize my pov with some degree of accuracy. What's good for America may not be in the national interest of all nations or vice versa. That's true of all nations.

Feel free to explain how UN Declaration of Human Rights has been more influential than say the U.S. Consitution, the Declaration of the Rights of Man, the Magna Carta, Roman law, English custom law . . . ? Show us your depth of knowledge because no one more than your humble servant is such need of a personal tutor. This is turning into an episode of Super Nanny.

Human rights haven't been central to foreign policy and mounds of bodies in Bosnia, Rwanda, N. Korea, Sudan, West Africa, Congo, Cambodia . . . say your wrong in believing the world will react to wholesale slaughter with military intervention to uphold human rights provisions in a document every nation signed.

I really don't mind how you perceive me to be, it's very much irrelevant. I will say though, that unless you know what the purpose of an organization is, and what it sets out to achieve saying that it's not much good is rather like saying 'I don't think much of this washing machine, it really doesn't dry my clothes very well'.

Refusing to use the spellchick!

I have put you on ignore. No really, I have, but you are still ruining my enjoyment of this site. .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 37
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

I really don't mind how you perceive me to be, it's very much irrelevant. I will say though, that unless you know what the purpose of an organization is, and what it sets out to achieve saying that it's not much good is rather like saying 'I don't think much of this washing machine, it really doesn't dry my clothes very well'.

What if it's a washer/dryer in one.

According to the Internal Revenue Service, the 400 richest American households earned a total of $US138 billion, up from $US105 billion a year earlier. That's an average of $US345 million each, on which they paid a tax rate of just 16.6 per cent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:lol:, now that's funny.

But it doesn't really change the point I was making. I can't see the purpose of naysaying an organization if you don't even know what it's does - except for some airy fairy notion that it's sole objective is to establish world peace.

Refusing to use the spellchick!

I have put you on ignore. No really, I have, but you are still ruining my enjoyment of this site. .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Colombia
Timeline
I really don't mind how you perceive me to be, it's very much irrelevant. I will say though, that unless you know what the purpose of an organization is, and what it sets out to achieve saying that it's not much good is rather like saying 'I don't think much of this washing machine, it really doesn't dry my clothes very well'.

What if it's a washer/dryer in one.

:rofl:

VERY well stated. :thumbs:

Wishing you ten-fold that which you wish upon all others.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:lol:, now that's funny.

But it doesn't really change the point I was making. I can't see the purpose of naysaying an organization if you don't even know what it's does - except for some airy fairy notion that it's sole objective is to establish world peace.

I get the point.

The UN is great in theory but simply does not have the power to get anything done. There are a lot of people part of the UN who are trying to do good deeds but face a mountain of obstacles. At the end of the day, the world has gone back to a point where everyone does their own thing anyway. Sanctions do not really work and the reality is the world is becoming polarized again.

According to the Internal Revenue Service, the 400 richest American households earned a total of $US138 billion, up from $US105 billion a year earlier. That's an average of $US345 million each, on which they paid a tax rate of just 16.6 per cent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Philippines
Timeline
I really don't mind how you perceive me to be, it's very much irrelevant. I will say though, that unless you know what the purpose of an organization is, and what it sets out to achieve saying that it's not much good is rather like saying 'I don't think much of this washing machine, it really doesn't dry my clothes very well'.

In defense of the washing machine I could explain what it does that is useful. I would explain a dryer has a different function.

You had told me nothing of value about the UN's role in keeping the peace but there wasn't too much to say about it was there?

At the end of the day, the world has gone back to a point where everyone does their own thing anyway.

Cleo's crystal ball is too cloudy to figure out what you're talking about.

Household appliances, anyone?

David & Lalai

th_ourweddingscrapbook-1.jpg

aneska1-3-1-1.gif

Greencard Received Date: July 3, 2009

Lifting of Conditions : March 18, 2011

I-751 Application Sent: April 23, 2011

Biometrics: June 9, 2011

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...