Poll: Racial views steer some white Dems away from Obama

[rebeccajo 14]

Good for them! We need White bigots to counter the effect of White guilt and Black entitlement among liberals that's driving Obama's popularity. Without those, the man with the thin resume wouldn't have a chance to win if he weren't Black. He hasn't earned the presidency, but if you have the tenacity to hold to that view, you must be a racist.

Where's the poll re how pro-Black racial bigotry has Helped Obama?

Racial bigotry in favor of Obama has gotten him farther than it would in a truly color-blind society. Being (half) Black has given Obama a great advantage among the left and the majority of the media who cry racism at every criticism and bend over backwards to show they're not bigoted. Their obsession with protecting Obama's record from critical examination in the media, and their inability to be objective and honest between Obama and McCain proves just how bigoted they are.

I'm not white and I still won't vote for Obama beause he's not qualified to be president, no matter what race he is.

And you call yourself educated?

I have to agree with you to call myself educated?

The only thing in your post that remotely makes any sense (beyond the inflammatory language) is (according to your logic) that one group of dumb-a$$ voters will counter the votes of the other dumb-a$$e$.

I deal in reality, rj. There are bigots on EITHER side of the contest - those that support Obama because he is Black, and those who don't support him because he is Black. We may as well find the best use for both; in my opinion, that is to counter each other. Your response denies this reality. In addition, your subjectively hostile and ad hominem approach to my post precludes your ability to judge anyone's education level since it is exhibits a lack of education and is in no way logic driven, even as you cite logic. If my language is "inflamatory", what is calling people dumb-a$$es? Non-inflamatory? You undermine your own statement by engaging in the act you are critical of.

If you have a view about the OP, it would serve you better to address the ideas there than to try to goud me into either changing my view or waste time bickering with you. You have failed to persuade me either way.

Oh please.

I'm not interested in persuading you. After all, I don't have all day to sit around here and play ring-around-the-rosy with you and your twisted idea of linguistics.

[Sofiyya 1,687]

Calling people names because they won't vote as you will be seems to be an honorable way to express yourself here, so why fight it.

It's obvious that you have to be some kind of idiot to vote for Obama/Biden. Those who do are socialists and radicals.

Ahhhhhhhhhhh, that felt good.

[PlatyPius 5]

Calling people names because they won't vote as you will be seems to be an honorable way to express yourself here, so why fight it.

It's obvious that you have to be some kind of idiot to vote for Obama/Biden. Those who do are socialists and radicals.

Ahhhhhhhhhhh, that felt good.

See?

My method really works, doesn't it?

[one...two...tree 2,762]

It's obvious that you have to be some kind of idiot to vote for Obama/Biden. Those who do are socialists and radicals.

Ahhhhhhhhhhh, that felt good.

No Democrat would ever say something so ridiculous about another Democrat. Thanks for playing.

[rebeccajo 14]

Calling people names because they won't vote as you will be seems to be an honorable way to express yourself here, so why fight it.

It's obvious that you have to be some kind of idiot to vote for Obama/Biden. Those who do are socialists and radicals.

Ahhhhhhhhhhh, that felt good.

Now we add immaturity into the mix.

A revelation that true colors really have nothing to do with race. They have more to do with character.

[Peikko 1,575]

Calling people names because they won't vote as you will be seems to be an honorable way to express yourself here, so why fight it.

It's obvious that you have to be some kind of idiot to vote for Obama/Biden. Those who do are socialists and radicals.

Ahhhhhhhhhhh, that felt good.

Now we add immaturity into the mix.

A revelation that true colors really have nothing to do with race. They have more to do with character.

[rebeccajo 14]

Calling people names because they won't vote as you will be seems to be an honorable way to express yourself here, so why fight it.

It's obvious that you have to be some kind of idiot to vote for Obama/Biden. Those who do are socialists and radicals.

Ahhhhhhhhhhh, that felt good.

Now we add immaturity into the mix.

A revelation that true colors really have nothing to do with race. They have more to do with character.

It's taking quite a long while for the reply too, don't you think?

I sense an essay is in the works.

Edited September 20, 2008 by rebeccajo

[Peikko 1,575]

It'll be something along the lines of she's not responsible for the way we interpret her posts and that she doesn't care anyway because posting on message boards isn't a big part of her life

[rebeccajo 14]

It'll be something along the lines of she's not responsible for the way we interpret her posts and that she doesn't care anyway because posting on message boards isn't a big part of her life

Oh right!

I had forgotten about that one!

It's a clever ruse, that - write yourself in circles and then you can interpret it anyway you like!

Edited September 20, 2008 by rebeccajo

[Sofiyya 1,687]

Calling people names because they won't vote as you will be seems to be an honorable way to express yourself here, so why fight it.

It's obvious that you have to be some kind of idiot to vote for Obama/Biden. Those who do are socialists and radicals.

Ahhhhhhhhhhh, that felt good.

Now we add immaturity into the mix.

A revelation that true colors really have nothing to do with race. They have more to do with character.

It has more to do with considering your audience. You have to do as they do so they can relate. Name calling has been a consistant element in the responses from those who oppose my views, so, if that's their level of discourse, that's what you have to deliver. It's not hard to see that. Obama gets it, and the fish rots from the head down.

[Peikko 1,575]

Yes, we all like to call you names GEG because that's the best argument we have against your opinions Oh boy, split my sides girl!

[rebeccajo 14]

Calling people names because they won't vote as you will be seems to be an honorable way to express yourself here, so why fight it.

It's obvious that you have to be some kind of idiot to vote for Obama/Biden. Those who do are socialists and radicals.

Ahhhhhhhhhhh, that felt good.

Now we add immaturity into the mix.

A revelation that true colors really have nothing to do with race. They have more to do with character.

It has more to do with considering your audience. You have to do as they do so they can relate. Name calling has been a consistant element in the responses from those who oppose my views, so, if that's their level of discourse, that's what you have to deliver. It's not hard to see that. Obama gets it, and the fish rots from the head down.

Oh, I see. So it's 'monkey see, monkey do' then?

I always thought if one was trying to win an argument (which is something you seem to wish to do - often) one tries to rise above the lesser traits of your opponent.

Incidentally, I can't really tell what your 'views' are. Other than angry.

[Peikko 1,575]

Calling people names because they won't vote as you will be seems to be an honorable way to express yourself here, so why fight it.

It's obvious that you have to be some kind of idiot to vote for Obama/Biden. Those who do are socialists and radicals.

Ahhhhhhhhhhh, that felt good.

Now we add immaturity into the mix.

A revelation that true colors really have nothing to do with race. They have more to do with character.

It has more to do with considering your audience. You have to do as they do so they can relate. Name calling has been a consistant element in the responses from those who oppose my views, so, if that's their level of discourse, that's what you have to deliver. It's not hard to see that. Obama gets it, and the fish rots from the head down.

Oh, I see. So it's 'monkey see, monkey do' then?

I always thought if one was trying to win an argument (which is something you seem to wish to do - often) one tries to rise above the lesser traits of your opponent.

Incidentally, I can't really tell what your 'views' are. Other than angry.

I'm shocked! You do realize that under the new conservative rules of political correctness, using time honoured expressions featuring animals is an abomination? I think you might just have used a racial slur!

[rebeccajo 14]

Calling people names because they won't vote as you will be seems to be an honorable way to express yourself here, so why fight it.

It's obvious that you have to be some kind of idiot to vote for Obama/Biden. Those who do are socialists and radicals.

Ahhhhhhhhhhh, that felt good.

Now we add immaturity into the mix.

A revelation that true colors really have nothing to do with race. They have more to do with character.

It has more to do with considering your audience. You have to do as they do so they can relate. Name calling has been a consistant element in the responses from those who oppose my views, so, if that's their level of discourse, that's what you have to deliver. It's not hard to see that. Obama gets it, and the fish rots from the head down.

Oh, I see. So it's 'monkey see, monkey do' then?

I always thought if one was trying to win an argument (which is something you seem to wish to do - often) one tries to rise above the lesser traits of your opponent.

Incidentally, I can't really tell what your 'views' are. Other than angry.

I'm shocked! You do realize that under the new conservative rules of political correctness, using time honoured expressions featuring animals is an abomination? I think you might just have used a racial slur!

[Sofiyya 1,687]

Liberals are up to a lot of monkey business, that's for sure.

No one has called me a racist yet. I'm disappointed.

Edited September 20, 2008 by Virtual wife