Jump to content

37 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 36
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Brazil
Timeline
Posted
Ah yes, there's also still quite a buzz around the area with the recent gay marriages.

When the first marriages arrived, just could grab a lawn chair, put it by City Hall, and watch the show, which included religious people fruitlessly whining. :lol:

game, set, and match ;)

No surprise private insurers, or, better yet, dumbasses with hypocritical moral values, would want to prevent a woman from performing an abortion. And to the poster who talks about private health insurance, this is the exact reason why there's no compromise with conservatives on the issue. Far, far too ideological, and it isn't even regarding them. Keep your own beliefs to yourself and quit trying to enforce them on others. Doctors are already allowed to be bigoted if they choose. Thankfully there's enough Planned Parenthood's out there to assist women in making a better choice, which might include adoption, or even performing an abortion to put themselves in a better position to parent later and ultimately (hopefully) learn from their mistake.

hopefully that in bold will apply to those who don't believe in a higher power.

I don't see them forcing abortions upon people who don't want one. Or telling religious people to accept gay marriage.

So you'll have to show me where that would apply to the non-religious.

i've seen that in vj.

now do you understand what i was talking about?

* ~ * Charles * ~ *
 

I carry a gun because a cop is too heavy.

 

USE THE REPORT BUTTON INSTEAD OF MESSAGING A MODERATOR!

Filed: Other Timeline
Posted

well you could come here to go gambling (plenty o'casinos), go eat, get bent and have sex or if you're single, complain about not having sex with someone else who isn't getting any either.

I am all that the Potter created me to be.

I celebrate, liberate and dedicate my life to His Glory.

I Am Uno!

Country:
Timeline
Posted
Ah yes, there's also still quite a buzz around the area with the recent gay marriages.

When the first marriages arrived, just could grab a lawn chair, put it by City Hall, and watch the show, which included religious people fruitlessly whining. :lol:

game, set, and match ;)

No surprise private insurers, or, better yet, dumbasses with hypocritical moral values, would want to prevent a woman from performing an abortion. And to the poster who talks about private health insurance, this is the exact reason why there's no compromise with conservatives on the issue. Far, far too ideological, and it isn't even regarding them. Keep your own beliefs to yourself and quit trying to enforce them on others. Doctors are already allowed to be bigoted if they choose. Thankfully there's enough Planned Parenthood's out there to assist women in making a better choice, which might include adoption, or even performing an abortion to put themselves in a better position to parent later and ultimately (hopefully) learn from their mistake.

hopefully that in bold will apply to those who don't believe in a higher power.

I don't see them forcing abortions upon people who don't want one. Or telling religious people to accept gay marriage.

So you'll have to show me where that would apply to the non-religious.

i've seen that in vj.

now do you understand what i was talking about?

Not really. It was religious people protesting legal gay marriages. In fact, it only re-enforces the credibility of religious people pushing their beliefs too far down others throat. Me just innocently watching and having a good time without bothering anyone has nothing to do with telling others what they need to accept. Bringing this around full circle, their accepting is not a requirement.

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Brazil
Timeline
Posted
Ah yes, there's also still quite a buzz around the area with the recent gay marriages.

When the first marriages arrived, just could grab a lawn chair, put it by City Hall, and watch the show, which included religious people fruitlessly whining. :lol:

game, set, and match ;)

No surprise private insurers, or, better yet, dumbasses with hypocritical moral values, would want to prevent a woman from performing an abortion. And to the poster who talks about private health insurance, this is the exact reason why there's no compromise with conservatives on the issue. Far, far too ideological, and it isn't even regarding them. Keep your own beliefs to yourself and quit trying to enforce them on others. Doctors are already allowed to be bigoted if they choose. Thankfully there's enough Planned Parenthood's out there to assist women in making a better choice, which might include adoption, or even performing an abortion to put themselves in a better position to parent later and ultimately (hopefully) learn from their mistake.

hopefully that in bold will apply to those who don't believe in a higher power.

I don't see them forcing abortions upon people who don't want one. Or telling religious people to accept gay marriage.

So you'll have to show me where that would apply to the non-religious.

i've seen that in vj.

now do you understand what i was talking about?

Not really. It was religious people protesting legal gay marriages. In fact, it only re-enforces the credibility of religious people pushing their beliefs too far down others throat. Me just innocently watching and having a good time without bothering anyone has nothing to do with telling others what they need to accept. Bringing this around full circle, their accepting is not a requirement.

in essence, they are being told to accept it. so what's being force fed to who here?

* ~ * Charles * ~ *
 

I carry a gun because a cop is too heavy.

 

USE THE REPORT BUTTON INSTEAD OF MESSAGING A MODERATOR!

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Colombia
Timeline
Posted
Ah yes, there's also still quite a buzz around the area with the recent gay marriages.

When the first marriages arrived, just could grab a lawn chair, put it by City Hall, and watch the show, which included religious people fruitlessly whining. :lol:

game, set, and match ;)

No surprise private insurers, or, better yet, dumbasses with hypocritical moral values, would want to prevent a woman from performing an abortion. And to the poster who talks about private health insurance, this is the exact reason why there's no compromise with conservatives on the issue. Far, far too ideological, and it isn't even regarding them. Keep your own beliefs to yourself and quit trying to enforce them on others. Doctors are already allowed to be bigoted if they choose. Thankfully there's enough Planned Parenthood's out there to assist women in making a better choice, which might include adoption, or even performing an abortion to put themselves in a better position to parent later and ultimately (hopefully) learn from their mistake.

hopefully that in bold will apply to those who don't believe in a higher power.

I don't see them forcing abortions upon people who don't want one. Or telling religious people to accept gay marriage.

So you'll have to show me where that would apply to the non-religious.

i've seen that in vj.

now do you understand what i was talking about?

Not really. It was religious people protesting legal gay marriages. In fact, it only re-enforces the credibility of religious people pushing their beliefs too far down others throat. Me just innocently watching and having a good time without bothering anyone has nothing to do with telling others what they need to accept. Bringing this around full circle, their accepting is not a requirement.

in essence, they are being told to accept it. so what's being force fed to who here?

Accept what? A marriage that doesn't infringe on theirs? Unless, of course, they're jealous somehow in some Freudian way.

Hence the key word- tolerate would be better used.

Too much BS here. Legal implies it was acted upon with the interests of citizens. All citizens. Anything else would be discriminatory.

Wishing you ten-fold that which you wish upon all others.

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Brazil
Timeline
Posted
Ah yes, there's also still quite a buzz around the area with the recent gay marriages.

When the first marriages arrived, just could grab a lawn chair, put it by City Hall, and watch the show, which included religious people fruitlessly whining. :lol:

game, set, and match ;)

No surprise private insurers, or, better yet, dumbasses with hypocritical moral values, would want to prevent a woman from performing an abortion. And to the poster who talks about private health insurance, this is the exact reason why there's no compromise with conservatives on the issue. Far, far too ideological, and it isn't even regarding them. Keep your own beliefs to yourself and quit trying to enforce them on others. Doctors are already allowed to be bigoted if they choose. Thankfully there's enough Planned Parenthood's out there to assist women in making a better choice, which might include adoption, or even performing an abortion to put themselves in a better position to parent later and ultimately (hopefully) learn from their mistake.

hopefully that in bold will apply to those who don't believe in a higher power.

I don't see them forcing abortions upon people who don't want one. Or telling religious people to accept gay marriage.

So you'll have to show me where that would apply to the non-religious.

i've seen that in vj.

now do you understand what i was talking about?

Not really. It was religious people protesting legal gay marriages. In fact, it only re-enforces the credibility of religious people pushing their beliefs too far down others throat. Me just innocently watching and having a good time without bothering anyone has nothing to do with telling others what they need to accept. Bringing this around full circle, their accepting is not a requirement.

in essence, they are being told to accept it. so what's being force fed to who here?

Accept what? A marriage that doesn't infringe on theirs? Unless, of course, they're jealous somehow in some Freudian way.

Hence the key word- tolerate would be better used.

Too much BS here. Legal implies it was acted upon with the interests of citizens. All citizens. Anything else would be discriminatory.

again, who is being force fed here? who is being forced to adapt to who?

* ~ * Charles * ~ *
 

I carry a gun because a cop is too heavy.

 

USE THE REPORT BUTTON INSTEAD OF MESSAGING A MODERATOR!

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Colombia
Timeline
Posted
Ah yes, there's also still quite a buzz around the area with the recent gay marriages.

When the first marriages arrived, just could grab a lawn chair, put it by City Hall, and watch the show, which included religious people fruitlessly whining. :lol:

game, set, and match ;)

No surprise private insurers, or, better yet, dumbasses with hypocritical moral values, would want to prevent a woman from performing an abortion. And to the poster who talks about private health insurance, this is the exact reason why there's no compromise with conservatives on the issue. Far, far too ideological, and it isn't even regarding them. Keep your own beliefs to yourself and quit trying to enforce them on others. Doctors are already allowed to be bigoted if they choose. Thankfully there's enough Planned Parenthood's out there to assist women in making a better choice, which might include adoption, or even performing an abortion to put themselves in a better position to parent later and ultimately (hopefully) learn from their mistake.

hopefully that in bold will apply to those who don't believe in a higher power.

I don't see them forcing abortions upon people who don't want one. Or telling religious people to accept gay marriage.

So you'll have to show me where that would apply to the non-religious.

i've seen that in vj.

now do you understand what i was talking about?

Not really. It was religious people protesting legal gay marriages. In fact, it only re-enforces the credibility of religious people pushing their beliefs too far down others throat. Me just innocently watching and having a good time without bothering anyone has nothing to do with telling others what they need to accept. Bringing this around full circle, their accepting is not a requirement.

in essence, they are being told to accept it. so what's being force fed to who here?

Accept what? A marriage that doesn't infringe on theirs? Unless, of course, they're jealous somehow in some Freudian way.

Hence the key word- tolerate would be better used.

Too much BS here. Legal implies it was acted upon with the interests of citizens. All citizens. Anything else would be discriminatory.

again, who is being force fed here? who is being forced to adapt to who?

And again, nobody is forcing marriage unto unwilling parties.

Wishing you ten-fold that which you wish upon all others.

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Brazil
Timeline
Posted
And again, nobody is forcing marriage unto unwilling parties.

i didn't say that was the case. ;)

* ~ * Charles * ~ *
 

I carry a gun because a cop is too heavy.

 

USE THE REPORT BUTTON INSTEAD OF MESSAGING A MODERATOR!

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Colombia
Timeline
Posted
And again, nobody is forcing marriage unto unwilling parties.

i didn't say that was the case. ;)

No you didn't. Then what did you say? What are you arguing in favor of (better question)?

In this particular tangent its:

gays that want to marry themselves

vs

people that have a problem with people that do not affect their lives getting married

I mean... #######!

Wishing you ten-fold that which you wish upon all others.

Filed: Citizen (apr) Country: Brazil
Timeline
Posted
And again, nobody is forcing marriage unto unwilling parties.

i didn't say that was the case. ;)

No you didn't. Then what did you say? What are you arguing in favor of (better question)?

In this particular tangent its:

gays that want to marry themselves

vs

people that have a problem with people that do not affect their lives getting married

I mean... #######!

you'll figure it out soon enough. it basically boils down to no matter what your religious beliefs are, they don't matter.

anyways, i have to go check out of the room and will be back sun. have fun.

* ~ * Charles * ~ *
 

I carry a gun because a cop is too heavy.

 

USE THE REPORT BUTTON INSTEAD OF MESSAGING A MODERATOR!

Posted
We're going to hike Starved Rock SP for the last weekend of summer.

Autumn starts Monday folks...

Are you staying at the lodge?

I live 20 mins from downtown chicago...what isnt there to do...navy pier, the museums, shedd aquarium, SHOPPING, restaurants, magnificent mile, yea, im lucky

American Girl Place opens at Water Tower Place October 1.

I'm going out to Gaelic Imports on West Lawrence. Nicky saw Irn Bru is being sold there. Must bring granny cart as I'm sure there will be several cases being purchased.

Feb 2005 - Met online through brit band doves

Dec 15th 2005 - Met for first time at U2 concert in NE, USA

Apr 30 2008 K1 Interview Approved

Dec 11 2008 AOS approved

Dec 18 2008 Permanent Resident card received

Oct 22 2010 ROC NOA 1 Received

Jan 31 2011 ROC Approved

Doves Music Blog / Doves Official

Filed: Timeline
Posted
I think we will try to take the ferry to one of the islands around Seattle to enjoy what's left of the sunshine.

Yes, Seattle is great! When flights were $99.00 RT out of Chicago, and the Double Tree Suites were $25.00 per night, I would go often. That was in 2000 & 2001. I will have to make a point to to there again for a weekend.

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...