Sarah Palin and the Two Americas

[GaryC 7]

The massive amount of posts with the vitriol and hatred aimed at Palin tells me that they are in a panic. If she were so ho-hum and so inconsequential then why are there so many topics with so many posts? Why all the personal attacks? This is all so telling. The left is running scared.

But you started this post..

and keep pasting same s#*t and same remarks and same replies over and over and over in different threads.

It's not even funny anymore. If you get paid for this kind of "marketing" it's cool, but let's not pretend that you genuinely interested in any discussion.

Starts to feel like Viagra and fake wathc e-mails.

Much like you go into the other dozen or so topics and post your same sh!t over and over? I do find your replies very funny. It shows just how bereft of class your side really is.

like your side as so much class...

again pot meet kettle...

Funny, I haven't seen the attacks on Obama's kids. Mind pointing that out for me?

are any of them pregnant?

you can't really say that if one of Obama's kids was pregnant you guys wouldn't say something about it...

you guys made a huge freakin deal over the fist pound Obama and his wife shared...

Ah, I see. So you think that the kids are fair game if one of them is pregnant with the justification that "they would do it if they had the chance". Very classy.

[Marilyn. 340]

The massive amount of posts with the vitriol and hatred aimed at Palin tells me that they are in a panic. If she were so ho-hum and so inconsequential then why are there so many topics with so many posts? Why all the personal attacks? This is all so telling. The left is running scared.

But you started this post..

and keep pasting same s#*t and same remarks and same replies over and over and over in different threads.

It's not even funny anymore. If you get paid for this kind of "marketing" it's cool, but let's not pretend that you genuinely interested in any discussion.

Starts to feel like Viagra and fake wathc e-mails.

Much like you go into the other dozen or so topics and post your same sh!t over and over? I do find your replies very funny. It shows just how bereft of class your side really is.

like your side as so much class...

again pot meet kettle...

don't you have some seals to club?

don't you have some gutters to clean??

[Ban Hammer 13,491]

you can't really say that if one of Obama's kids was pregnant you guys wouldn't say something about it...

given his kids are 9 and 6, that might be something to talk about eh?

The massive amount of posts with the vitriol and hatred aimed at Palin tells me that they are in a panic. If she were so ho-hum and so inconsequential then why are there so many topics with so many posts? Why all the personal attacks? This is all so telling. The left is running scared.

But you started this post..

and keep pasting same s#*t and same remarks and same replies over and over and over in different threads.

It's not even funny anymore. If you get paid for this kind of "marketing" it's cool, but let's not pretend that you genuinely interested in any discussion.

Starts to feel like Viagra and fake wathc e-mails.

Much like you go into the other dozen or so topics and post your same sh!t over and over? I do find your replies very funny. It shows just how bereft of class your side really is.

like your side as so much class...

again pot meet kettle...

don't you have some seals to club?

don't you have some gutters to clean??

i'll be right over

[GaryC 7]

The massive amount of posts with the vitriol and hatred aimed at Palin tells me that they are in a panic. If she were so ho-hum and so inconsequential then why are there so many topics with so many posts? Why all the personal attacks? This is all so telling. The left is running scared.

But you started this post..

and keep pasting same s#*t and same remarks and same replies over and over and over in different threads.

It's not even funny anymore. If you get paid for this kind of "marketing" it's cool, but let's not pretend that you genuinely interested in any discussion.

Starts to feel like Viagra and fake wathc e-mails.

Much like you go into the other dozen or so topics and post your same sh!t over and over? I do find your replies very funny. It shows just how bereft of class your side really is.

like your side as so much class...

again pot meet kettle...

Funny, I haven't seen the attacks on Obama's kids. Mind pointing that out for me?

Somehow I doubt you are calling that side classless only due to the discussion of her children. I wonder why that is.

Thank you for that insight into my motivations. Did you learn that from Kreskin?

[Marilyn. 340]

The massive amount of posts with the vitriol and hatred aimed at Palin tells me that they are in a panic. If she were so ho-hum and so inconsequential then why are there so many topics with so many posts? Why all the personal attacks? This is all so telling. The left is running scared.

But you started this post..

and keep pasting same s#*t and same remarks and same replies over and over and over in different threads.

It's not even funny anymore. If you get paid for this kind of "marketing" it's cool, but let's not pretend that you genuinely interested in any discussion.

Starts to feel like Viagra and fake wathc e-mails.

Much like you go into the other dozen or so topics and post your same sh!t over and over? I do find your replies very funny. It shows just how bereft of class your side really is.

like your side as so much class...

again pot meet kettle...

Funny, I haven't seen the attacks on Obama's kids. Mind pointing that out for me?

are any of them pregnant?

you can't really say that if one of Obama's kids was pregnant you guys wouldn't say something about it...

you guys made a huge freakin deal over the fist pound Obama and his wife shared...

Ah, I see. So you think that the kids are fair game if one of them is pregnant with the justification that "they would do it if they had the chance". Very classy.

there ya go putting words in my mouth... I never said it was ok to bring the children into this.. please tell me there I said this..

the point I am trying to make is that the republicans would do it if they had the chance ...

[GaryC 7]

The massive amount of posts with the vitriol and hatred aimed at Palin tells me that they are in a panic. If she were so ho-hum and so inconsequential then why are there so many topics with so many posts? Why all the personal attacks? This is all so telling. The left is running scared.

But you started this post..

and keep pasting same s#*t and same remarks and same replies over and over and over in different threads.

It's not even funny anymore. If you get paid for this kind of "marketing" it's cool, but let's not pretend that you genuinely interested in any discussion.

Starts to feel like Viagra and fake wathc e-mails.

Much like you go into the other dozen or so topics and post your same sh!t over and over? I do find your replies very funny. It shows just how bereft of class your side really is.

like your side as so much class...

again pot meet kettle...

Funny, I haven't seen the attacks on Obama's kids. Mind pointing that out for me?

are any of them pregnant?

you can't really say that if one of Obama's kids was pregnant you guys wouldn't say something about it...

you guys made a huge freakin deal over the fist pound Obama and his wife shared...

Ah, I see. So you think that the kids are fair game if one of them is pregnant with the justification that "they would do it if they had the chance". Very classy.

there ya go putting words in my mouth... I never said it was ok to bring the children into this.. please tell me there I said this..

the point I am trying to make is that the republicans would do it if they had the chance ...

So that makes it all ok then. Nice to know.

[LaL 418]

Much like you go into the other dozen or so topics and post your same sh!t over and over? I do find your replies very funny. It shows just how bereft of class your side really is.

like your side as so much class...

again pot meet kettle...

Funny, I haven't seen the attacks on Obama's kids. Mind pointing that out for me?

Somehow I doubt you are calling that side classless only due to the discussion of her children. I wonder why that is.

Thank you for that insight into my motivations. Did you learn that from Kreskin?

Gary - you state yourself you are completely partisan. Calling dems <insert any derogatory adjective here> is pretty typical!

ETA: *regardless* of the discussion topic

Edited September 3, 2008 by LaL

[GaryC 7]

Much like you go into the other dozen or so topics and post your same sh!t over and over? I do find your replies very funny. It shows just how bereft of class your side really is.

like your side as so much class...

again pot meet kettle...

Funny, I haven't seen the attacks on Obama's kids. Mind pointing that out for me?

Somehow I doubt you are calling that side classless only due to the discussion of her children. I wonder why that is.

Thank you for that insight into my motivations. Did you learn that from Kreskin?

Gary - you state yourself you are completely partisan. Calling dems <insert any derogatory adjective here> is pretty typical!

ETA: *regardless* of the discussion topic

Hey, your good! How do you read my mind from that distance? Do it again!

[morocco4ever 63]

You guys don't disappoint. Keep proving my point. McCain/Palin has you running scared. If not then why this huge outpouring of hatred? This is going to be a fun election to watch.

Gary, do you think she's experienced to be a heartbeat away from the top job? Can you sell that, without bringing up Obama?

She already has more executive experience than Obama. Given the choice between the two I would choose Palin any day.

So, do you think her record stands on its own? Because it seems that you do need to use Obama as a comparison in that answer. What specifically about her two years experience is good enough for you?

What specifically in Obama's 4 years of experience is good enough for you?

Ok, I'll answer. Then your turn.

I see the President more as an influential figure. Someone to inspire (eg Kennedy and the Space Race) and to set a tone for the country (although I wasn't paying much attention to US politics in the late 70s/early 80s, it appears that Reagen was able to do that in a way that Carter was not - the 'morning in America' ad, for example). I see these things in Obama. He is bringing people into politics in a way that has little to no precedent. If that many people care about the country, and will follow through beyond Nov, that's great for the US - regardless of whether you're left or right. People do need to get involved in their communities, and I see that possibility with an Obama victory.

Now. What do you see in Palin?

So in other words it's not about experience. I see.

Keep in mind that McCain HAS the experience needed now as opposed to Obama using some sort of a magical power of persuasion to bring the country together. But to answer your question on Palin, First and foremost she is a conservative. That is what is important to me. She brings an unashamed set of values with her that is exactly what I want to see in a VP. She had the guts and determination to stand up to corruption even in her own party and clean house. Can Obama say that? He came up in one of the most corrupt political landscapes in the country, Chicago. Have you seen any attempt from Obama to try and correct any of that? Nope. In fact he embraced that corruption with his association of Rezco. I also like the idea that she has no ties to Washington and no back she has to scratch. I would hope that when McCain wins he will turn her loose on Washington and shake it right down to it's roots.

So if she was the presidential candidate rather than McCain, and she was running against a democrat with many years of political experience and accomplishments behind him or her, who would you vote for? Would it depend on the issues, or would your vote remain the same since you are obviously a devout republican?

As far as I am concerned Palin has it over Obama with both experience and issues. What the dems try so hard to sweep under the rug is that Obama has no relevant experience. At least Palin has 2 years of executive experience. Something that Obama does not have in any way. But the point is this. It's Obama vs MCCAIN! McCain is vastly more experienced than Obama. This massive personal attack that Palin is being treated to puts a fine point on that. They are grasping at any perceived weakness and this is the best they can come up with. Putting that all aside though, given the choice between Palin and Obama I would gladly choose Palin based on values, experience and character. Obama is just an empty suit.

Uh..okay. But you didn't answer my question.

[Marilyn. 340]

The massive amount of posts with the vitriol and hatred aimed at Palin tells me that they are in a panic. If she were so ho-hum and so inconsequential then why are there so many topics with so many posts? Why all the personal attacks? This is all so telling. The left is running scared.

But you started this post..

and keep pasting same s#*t and same remarks and same replies over and over and over in different threads.

It's not even funny anymore. If you get paid for this kind of "marketing" it's cool, but let's not pretend that you genuinely interested in any discussion.

Starts to feel like Viagra and fake wathc e-mails.

Much like you go into the other dozen or so topics and post your same sh!t over and over? I do find your replies very funny. It shows just how bereft of class your side really is.

like your side as so much class...

again pot meet kettle...

Funny, I haven't seen the attacks on Obama's kids. Mind pointing that out for me?

are any of them pregnant?

you can't really say that if one of Obama's kids was pregnant you guys wouldn't say something about it...

you guys made a huge freakin deal over the fist pound Obama and his wife shared...

Ah, I see. So you think that the kids are fair game if one of them is pregnant with the justification that "they would do it if they had the chance". Very classy.

there ya go putting words in my mouth... I never said it was ok to bring the children into this.. please tell me there I said this..

the point I am trying to make is that the republicans would do it if they had the chance ...

So that makes it all ok then. Nice to know.

oh my gosh.. you are so not getting it

I never said it was ok.. my point is that is silly for the Republicans to say, "how dare they bring the children into this" when they would turn around and do the same...

and just to be clear I have never stated what side I am on.. I am really trying to be in the middle...

I just would like to see these discussions be more fair...

[LaL 418]

Much like you go into the other dozen or so topics and post your same sh!t over and over? I do find your replies very funny. It shows just how bereft of class your side really is.

like your side as so much class...

again pot meet kettle...

Funny, I haven't seen the attacks on Obama's kids. Mind pointing that out for me?

Somehow I doubt you are calling that side classless only due to the discussion of her children. I wonder why that is.

Thank you for that insight into my motivations. Did you learn that from Kreskin?

Gary - you state yourself you are completely partisan. Calling dems <insert any derogatory adjective here> is pretty typical!

ETA: *regardless* of the discussion topic

Hey, your good! How do you read my mind from that distance? Do it again!

Why this reaction? You are partisan by your own admission. For me to read a derogatory description of the other side (dem) coming from you does not surprise me.

[Jenn! 918]

The snottiness is so childish.

I can't even stand to come into these threads anymore.

[GaryC 7]

You guys don't disappoint. Keep proving my point. McCain/Palin has you running scared. If not then why this huge outpouring of hatred? This is going to be a fun election to watch.

Gary, do you think she's experienced to be a heartbeat away from the top job? Can you sell that, without bringing up Obama?

She already has more executive experience than Obama. Given the choice between the two I would choose Palin any day.

So, do you think her record stands on its own? Because it seems that you do need to use Obama as a comparison in that answer. What specifically about her two years experience is good enough for you?

What specifically in Obama's 4 years of experience is good enough for you?

Ok, I'll answer. Then your turn.

I see the President more as an influential figure. Someone to inspire (eg Kennedy and the Space Race) and to set a tone for the country (although I wasn't paying much attention to US politics in the late 70s/early 80s, it appears that Reagen was able to do that in a way that Carter was not - the 'morning in America' ad, for example). I see these things in Obama. He is bringing people into politics in a way that has little to no precedent. If that many people care about the country, and will follow through beyond Nov, that's great for the US - regardless of whether you're left or right. People do need to get involved in their communities, and I see that possibility with an Obama victory.

Now. What do you see in Palin?

So in other words it's not about experience. I see.

Keep in mind that McCain HAS the experience needed now as opposed to Obama using some sort of a magical power of persuasion to bring the country together. But to answer your question on Palin, First and foremost she is a conservative. That is what is important to me. She brings an unashamed set of values with her that is exactly what I want to see in a VP. She had the guts and determination to stand up to corruption even in her own party and clean house. Can Obama say that? He came up in one of the most corrupt political landscapes in the country, Chicago. Have you seen any attempt from Obama to try and correct any of that? Nope. In fact he embraced that corruption with his association of Rezco. I also like the idea that she has no ties to Washington and no back she has to scratch. I would hope that when McCain wins he will turn her loose on Washington and shake it right down to it's roots.

So if she was the presidential candidate rather than McCain, and she was running against a democrat with many years of political experience and accomplishments behind him or her, who would you vote for? Would it depend on the issues, or would your vote remain the same since you are obviously a devout republican?

As far as I am concerned Palin has it over Obama with both experience and issues. What the dems try so hard to sweep under the rug is that Obama has no relevant experience. At least Palin has 2 years of executive experience. Something that Obama does not have in any way. But the point is this. It's Obama vs MCCAIN! McCain is vastly more experienced than Obama. This massive personal attack that Palin is being treated to puts a fine point on that. They are grasping at any perceived weakness and this is the best they can come up with. Putting that all aside though, given the choice between Palin and Obama I would gladly choose Palin based on values, experience and character. Obama is just an empty suit.

Uh..okay. But you didn't answer my question.

Having trouble with your reading? There I bolded my answer to make it easier.

[Fedup 0]

The massive amount of posts with the vitriol and hatred aimed at Palin tells me that they are in a panic. If she were so ho-hum and so inconsequential then why are there so many topics with so many posts? Why all the personal attacks? This is all so telling. The left is running scared.

But you started this post..

and keep pasting same s#*t and same remarks and same replies over and over and over in different threads.

It's not even funny anymore. If you get paid for this kind of "marketing" it's cool, but let's not pretend that you genuinely interested in any discussion.

Starts to feel like Viagra and fake wathc e-mails.

Much like you go into the other dozen or so topics and post your same sh!t over and over? I do find your replies very funny. It shows just how bereft of class your side really is.

"I do find your replies very funny" - thanks, but I do not write them for your enjoyment, it's rather an unexpected side effect.

"how bereft of class your side really is" - sorry to insult your "elitist" class feelings. I suspected as much, looking at the superior intelligence of your pasted soundbytes.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

The massive amount of posts with the vitriol and hatred aimed at Palin tells me that they are in a panic. If she were so ho-hum and so inconsequential then why are there so many topics with so many posts? Why all the personal attacks? This is all so telling. The left is running scared.

But you started this post..

and keep pasting same s#*t and same remarks and same replies over and over and over in different threads.

It's not even funny anymore. If you get paid for this kind of "marketing" it's cool, but let's not pretend that you genuinely interested in any discussion.

Starts to feel like Viagra and fake wathc e-mails.

Much like you go into the other dozen or so topics and post your same sh!t over and over? I do find your replies very funny. It shows just how bereft of class your side really is.

like your side as so much class...

again pot meet kettle...

Funny, I haven't seen the attacks on Obama's kids. Mind pointing that out for me?

are any of them pregnant?

you can't really say that if one of Obama's kids was pregnant you guys wouldn't say something about it...

you guys made a huge freakin deal over the fist pound Obama and his wife shared...

Ah, I see. So you think that the kids are fair game if one of them is pregnant with the justification that "they would do it if they had the chance". Very classy.

there ya go putting words in my mouth... I never said it was ok to bring the children into this.. please tell me there I said this..

the point I am trying to make is that the republicans would do it if they had the chance ...

So that makes it all ok then. Nice to know.

The irony in this statement - given the posted threads over the last few months is simply staggering.

Really priceless.

Move along people - nothing to see here. Yet again....