Jump to content
Not Available

Anyone see CNN last night?

 Share

183 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 182
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Filed: Timeline

What's interesting is how the party that is in pursuit of the vote of the morally righteous puts a divorced and remarried guy on top of the ticket (one who left his first wife less than honorable if I remember right) and offers a VP candidate whose family can't seem to live up to their morality standards as the icing on the cake, so to speak. And here they are celebrating these choices. Truly wonderful. Comes to show that the GOP and the religous righteous right is more inclusive and accepting than some might like to think. Way to go! :thumbs:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Both parties have and will do it, when they deem it necessary. If you believed "change", you were just as gullible as the rest who did.

Oh, believe me, I never did buy into the "change" #######

Anyways, since the original "Trig is really Bristol's kid" is being peddled by Andrew Sullivan (gay) and Markos Moulitsas (San Francisco), along with a joke I heard Bill Maher (Hollywood) tell about Trig and the fact Sarah Palin dared have more than one child, Karl Rove must be thinking Christmas came early.

What's interesting is how the party that is in pursuit of the vote of the morally righteous puts a divorced and remarried guy on top of the ticket (one who left his first wife less than honorable if I remember right) and offers a VP candidate whose family can't seem to live up to their morality standards as the icing on the cake, so to speak. And here they are celebrating these choices. Truly wonderful. Comes to show that the GOP and the religous righteous right is more inclusive and accepting than some might like to think. Way to go! :thumbs:

And what's interesting to me is some of the comments I am reading from "progressive" young Democrats. It proves that the sexist cave men aren't necessarily members of the Republican party.

90day.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Country:
Timeline
The difference is that this girl, like Chelsea Clinton, has not chosen to be in the spotlight.

You mean, by attending campaign events like this:

http://d.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/p/nm/2008090...HZz_r3oZtaGNw--

Nonsense. By campaigning with her mom she puts herself in the spotlight. Sorry, your invasion-of-privacy or spare-the-innocent-child nonsense doesn't fly.

The poster is funny as hell. :)

So does that apply if the Right suddenly taste blood and go after the Obama children? Hey - fair's fair!

If they're out campaigning for him, why not?

Also, this teenager (Palin's daughter) is pretty much an adult, and can make conscious choices about things.

Interesting. Children are now fair game to score political points. This is not "change" I can believe in.

Both parties have and will do it, when they deem it necessary. If you believed "change", you were just as gullible as the rest who did.

Still waiting on the actual proof that its the actual campaigns behind such ridiculous tactics.

Call the NSA and AT&T, maybe they'll let you listen into certain conversations. :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Colombia
Timeline
Karl Rove must be thinking Christmas came early

EXACTLY. This is precisely what he (and people like him) want since they know all this attention undercuts all those issues that would keep McCain out of the White House.

The difference is that this girl, like Chelsea Clinton, has not chosen to be in the spotlight.

You mean, by attending campaign events like this:

http://d.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/p/nm/2008090...HZz_r3oZtaGNw--

Nonsense. By campaigning with her mom she puts herself in the spotlight. Sorry, your invasion-of-privacy or spare-the-innocent-child nonsense doesn't fly.

The poster is funny as hell. :)

So does that apply if the Right suddenly taste blood and go after the Obama children? Hey - fair's fair!

If they're out campaigning for him, why not?

Also, this teenager (Palin's daughter) is pretty much an adult, and can make conscious choices about things.

Interesting. Children are now fair game to score political points. This is not "change" I can believe in.

Both parties have and will do it, when they deem it necessary. If you believed "change", you were just as gullible as the rest who did.

Still waiting on the actual proof that its the actual campaigns behind such ridiculous tactics.

Call the NSA and AT&T, maybe they'll let you listen into certain conversations. :P

Well... :lol:

There's an idea!

I *did* work for AT&T for a bit... :idea:

Wishing you ten-fold that which you wish upon all others.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Both parties have and will do it, when they deem it necessary. If you believed "change", you were just as gullible as the rest who did.

Oh, believe me, I never did buy into the "change" #######

Anyways, since the original "Trig is really Bristol's kid" is being peddled by Andrew Sullivan (gay) and Markos Moulitsas (San Francisco), along with a joke I heard Bill Maher (Hollywood) tell about Trig and the fact Sarah Palin dared have more than one child, Karl Rove must be thinking Christmas came early.

What's interesting is how the party that is in pursuit of the vote of the morally righteous puts a divorced and remarried guy on top of the ticket (one who left his first wife less than honorable if I remember right) and offers a VP candidate whose family can't seem to live up to their morality standards as the icing on the cake, so to speak. And here they are celebrating these choices. Truly wonderful. Comes to show that the GOP and the religous righteous right is more inclusive and accepting than some might like to think. Way to go! :thumbs:

And what's interesting to me is some of the comments I am reading from "progressive" young Democrats. It proves that the sexist cave men aren't necessarily members of the Republican party.

:thumbs:

Refusing to use the spellchick!

I have put you on ignore. No really, I have, but you are still ruining my enjoyment of this site. .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Colombia
Timeline
Both parties have and will do it, when they deem it necessary. If you believed "change", you were just as gullible as the rest who did.

Oh, believe me, I never did buy into the "change" #######

Anyways, since the original "Trig is really Bristol's kid" is being peddled by Andrew Sullivan (gay) and Markos Moulitsas (San Francisco), along with a joke I heard Bill Maher (Hollywood) tell about Trig and the fact Sarah Palin dared have more than one child, Karl Rove must be thinking Christmas came early.

What's interesting is how the party that is in pursuit of the vote of the morally righteous puts a divorced and remarried guy on top of the ticket (one who left his first wife less than honorable if I remember right) and offers a VP candidate whose family can't seem to live up to their morality standards as the icing on the cake, so to speak. And here they are celebrating these choices. Truly wonderful. Comes to show that the GOP and the religous righteous right is more inclusive and accepting than some might like to think. Way to go! :thumbs:

And what's interesting to me is some of the comments I am reading from "progressive" young Democrats. It proves that the sexist cave men aren't necessarily members of the Republican party.

:thumbs:

Yes that seems to be the case. :(

Obama still has a shot at making political gains by putting those cavemen back in the GEICO commercials.

Wishing you ten-fold that which you wish upon all others.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline
What's interesting is how the party that is in pursuit of the vote of the morally righteous puts a divorced and remarried guy on top of the ticket (one who left his first wife less than honorable if I remember right) and offers a VP candidate whose family can't seem to live up to their morality standards as the icing on the cake, so to speak. And here they are celebrating these choices. Truly wonderful. Comes to show that the GOP and the religous righteous right is more inclusive and accepting than some might like to think. Way to go! :thumbs:

And what's interesting to me is some of the comments I am reading from "progressive" young Democrats. It proves that the sexist cave men aren't necessarily members of the Republican party.

Sexist cavemen? How did we arrive at that label? Weighing the professed stance of candidates on family values and their pursuit of a seemingly morally superior crowd against the personal realities of these candidates makes one a sexist caveman now? That is interesting indeed. Carry on!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Colombia
Timeline

To give her credit I don't think she was referring to many actual Democrat bloggers out there.

Wishing you ten-fold that which you wish upon all others.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Country: Philippines
Timeline

...not sure if anyone posted this here already and I personally don't think this should even be an issue, but I thought this is worth pointing out - the sentiment from one of the loudest political pundits of the Right:

“On the pinhead front, 16-year-old Jamie Lynn Spears is pregnant. The sister of Britney says she is shocked. I bet. Now most teens are pinheads in some ways. But here the blame falls primarily on the parents of the girl, who obviously have little control over her or even over Britney Spears. Look at the way she behaves.” -Bill O’Reilly
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Country: Vietnam (no flag)
Timeline
Well, at least it would make others laugh, rather than have their panties twisted over it. Learn to take a friggen joke.

Do you think the "jokes" about Chelsea Clinton made by Rush Limbaugh were funny? We are talking about a teenaged girl here, not a politician.

Let's not forget this jewel:

John McCain made this odious joke about Chelsea Clinton back in ‘98.

Why is Chelsea Clinton so ugly? Because her father is Janet Reno.”

– Sen. John McCain, speaking to a Republican dinner, June 1998.

http://www.crooksandliars.com/2008/02/09/j...a-clinton-joke/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Colombia
Timeline
...not sure if anyone posted this here already and I personally don't think this should even be an issue, but I thought this is worth pointing out - the sentiment from one of the loudest political pundits of the Right:

"On the pinhead front, 16-year-old Jamie Lynn Spears is pregnant. The sister of Britney says she is shocked. I bet. Now most teens are pinheads in some ways. But here the blame falls primarily on the parents of the girl, who obviously have little control over her or even over Britney Spears. Look at the way she behaves." -Bill O'Reilly

:lol:

Ironic. Call him a Democrat!

Wishing you ten-fold that which you wish upon all others.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...