Hillary Clinton Democrat doesn't know McCain is anti-choice

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

Debra Bartoshevich, a self-described "proud Hillary Clinton Democrat" ... opposes Barack Obama and will vote for John McCain. To back up the message, Republicans arranged a press-conference in Denver Monday morning with Bartoshevich and other Clinton supporters, who are all now backing McCain.

Midway through the event, Bartoschevich was asked if she was concerned about McCain's pro-life voting record. At a podium paid for by the Republican National Committee, with McCain aide Carly Fiorina standing nearby, Bartoschevich said this:

Going back to 1999, John McCain did an interview with the San Francisco Chronicle saying that overturning Roe v. Wade would not make any sense, because then women would have to have illegal abortions.

...

After the event, an RNC spokesman reiterated that McCain has been very clear about his position on abortion this campaign cycle. And he has. He speaks about the life issue at almost every campaign event, and his campaign has aggressively courted evangelical voters by highlighting McCain's consistent pro-life voting record, and his stated determination to appoint Supreme Court justices like Alito and Roberts.

http://www.time-blog.com/swampland/2008/08...mccain_doe.html

[dalegg 143]

I love term "anti-choice".

Kind of a bad rebranding game to start though, because if pro-lifers are going to be renamed "anti-choice", then pro-choicers are going to have to be renamed "anti-life" which to me iounds even worse than "pro-abortion".

[HAL 9000 96]

I love term "anti-choice".

Kind of a bad rebranding game to start though, because if pro-lifers are going to be renamed "anti-choice", then pro-choicers are going to have to be renamed "anti-life" which to me iounds even worse than "pro-abortion".

I guess it depends on whom you want to go with... those defending choice and those wanting to impose.

[dalegg 143]

I love term "anti-choice".

Kind of a bad rebranding game to start though, because if pro-lifers are going to be renamed "anti-choice", then pro-choicers are going to have to be renamed "anti-life" which to me iounds even worse than "pro-abortion".

I guess it depends on whom you want to go with... those defending choice and those wanting to impose.

The old names work just as well.

[HAL 9000 96]

I love term "anti-choice".

Kind of a bad rebranding game to start though, because if pro-lifers are going to be renamed "anti-choice", then pro-choicers are going to have to be renamed "anti-life" which to me iounds even worse than "pro-abortion".

I guess it depends on whom you want to go with... those defending choice and those wanting to impose.

The old names work just as well.

I suppose if its coming from a particular opposing viewpoint, it just as well could work well enough.

IMO it should just be more similar to what is being fought over- choice vs imposition.

[dalegg 143]

I love term "anti-choice".

Kind of a bad rebranding game to start though, because if pro-lifers are going to be renamed "anti-choice", then pro-choicers are going to have to be renamed "anti-life" which to me iounds even worse than "pro-abortion".

I guess it depends on whom you want to go with... those defending choice and those wanting to impose.

The old names work just as well.

I suppose if its coming from a particular opposing viewpoint, it just as well could work well enough.

IMO it should just be more similar to what is being fought over- choice vs imposition.

You're right, it's just from the opposing viewpoint. You might be suprised to find out the other side sees the fight to be about life vs death.

[HAL 9000 96]

I love term "anti-choice".

Kind of a bad rebranding game to start though, because if pro-lifers are going to be renamed "anti-choice", then pro-choicers are going to have to be renamed "anti-life" which to me iounds even worse than "pro-abortion".

I guess it depends on whom you want to go with... those defending choice and those wanting to impose.

The old names work just as well.

I suppose if its coming from a particular opposing viewpoint, it just as well could work well enough.

IMO it should just be more similar to what is being fought over- choice vs imposition.

You're right, it's just from the opposing viewpoint. You might be suprised to find out the other side sees the fight to be about life vs death.

I know people see sometimes a little too much into what they are fighting for... yet it does not preclude that they are imposing onto others.

[dalegg 143]

I love term "anti-choice".

Kind of a bad rebranding game to start though, because if pro-lifers are going to be renamed "anti-choice", then pro-choicers are going to have to be renamed "anti-life" which to me iounds even worse than "pro-abortion".

I guess it depends on whom you want to go with... those defending choice and those wanting to impose.

The old names work just as well.

I suppose if its coming from a particular opposing viewpoint, it just as well could work well enough.

IMO it should just be more similar to what is being fought over- choice vs imposition.

You're right, it's just from the opposing viewpoint. You might be suprised to find out the other side sees the fight to be about life vs death.

I know people see sometimes a little too much into what they are fighting for... yet it does not preclude that they are imposing onto others.

No. I am not doing this again.

[chri'stina 190]

I love term "anti-choice".

Kind of a bad rebranding game to start though, because if pro-lifers are going to be renamed "anti-choice", then pro-choicers are going to have to be renamed "anti-life" which to me iounds even worse than "pro-abortion".

I guess it depends on whom you want to go with... those defending choice and those wanting to impose.

The old names work just as well.

I suppose if its coming from a particular opposing viewpoint, it just as well could work well enough.

IMO it should just be more similar to what is being fought over- choice vs imposition.

You're right, it's just from the opposing viewpoint. You might be suprised to find out the other side sees the fight to be about life vs death.

[HAL 9000 96]

I love term "anti-choice".

Kind of a bad rebranding game to start though, because if pro-lifers are going to be renamed "anti-choice", then pro-choicers are going to have to be renamed "anti-life" which to me iounds even worse than "pro-abortion".

I guess it depends on whom you want to go with... those defending choice and those wanting to impose.

The old names work just as well.

I suppose if its coming from a particular opposing viewpoint, it just as well could work well enough.

IMO it should just be more similar to what is being fought over- choice vs imposition.

You're right, it's just from the opposing viewpoint. You might be suprised to find out the other side sees the fight to be about life vs death.

I know people see sometimes a little too much into what they are fighting for... yet it does not preclude that they are imposing onto others.

No. I am not doing this again.

And a big shocker... I am not particularly fond of the procedure itself. Yet I am not a woman so I do not impose my opinion.

[HAL 9000 96]

If its a life vs. death issue-

Then those actually performing the procuedure and/or wilfully terminating can burn in hell if that's the case. Free will.

[Chica Yeyé 41]

Someone, please bring out a violin....