Jump to content
Amby

dr reprimanded for sterilizing patient with "learning disabilities"

 Share

11 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: Timeline

The Arkansas State Medical Board has reprimanded an obstetrician who once practiced in Berryville after she admitted to secretly tying the fallopian tubes of a patient with learning difficulties.

Dr. Shirolyn Ruth Moffett, who now has a private practice in Eureka Springs, performed the procedure on a patient last year during a Caesarean section. A split medical board vote 6-5 Thursday to place the reprimand on Moffett's permanent record, but it doesn't stop her from practicing medicine.

Moffett says she performed the procedure because she feared the lining of the patient's uterus would burst if she got pregnant again.

Moffett has resigned from her post at St. John's Hospital in Berryville. She also has decided never to deliver babies again.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,400027,00.html

Life is a ticket to the greatest show on earth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: IR-1/CR-1 Visa Country: Canada
Timeline

What's sad about this - is that had she been grossly negligent in the way she performed the surgery, she probably would have lost her license. I guess failing to get consent to perform a surgery really isn't that bad - what a joke that reviewing panel is. That's so beyond unethical.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Country: Morocco
Timeline
:thumbs: Amen to that Cat!!

Maggie

08-07-06 I129 NOA1

02-05-07 Visa in Hand

02-13-07 POE JFK w/temp EAD

02-23-07 Civil Marriage

06-17-07 Wedding

08-13-07 Card received in mail

04-14-09 Trip to Maui for Anniversary

06-04-09 Filed to lift conditions

08-13-09 Perm Card received

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline
She's a ###### for delivering babies. And, to prevent sick people from having babies. ROFL.

Who the FFF made you and her God? I didn't get the memo.

His English isn't so good, who knows what he really meant.

Man is made by his belief. As he believes, so he is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Country: Canada
Timeline

a doctor doesn't have the right to operate on you without your permission...

like what if something went wrong.. that doctor would have been in so much more trouble...

mvSuprise-hug.gif
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not sure that this version of the story is very complete.

The woman had learning difficulties and the pertinant part of the story for me was this bit: "Moffett says she performed the procedure because she feared the lining of the patient's uterus would burst if she got pregnant again."

Who knows what the guardians of this patient were like? Were they religious and didn't believe in birth control? Why was she pregnant 'again'? Was this an abortion proceedure?

If all these questions give an answer that suggests that the tying of the fallopian tubes was malicious then fine, but if for some reason the Dr sincerely believed what she was doing was in the best medical interests of someone incapable of making that decision themselves then that's slightly different and the reprimand is more understandable.

Edited by Purple_Hibiscus

Refusing to use the spellchick!

I have put you on ignore. No really, I have, but you are still ruining my enjoyment of this site. .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline
I am not sure that this version of the story is very complete.

The woman had learning difficulties and the pertinant part of the story for me was this bit: "Moffett says she performed the procedure because she feared the lining of the patient's uterus would burst if she got pregnant again."

Who knows what the guardians of this patient were like? Were they religious and didn't believe in birth control? Why was she pregnant 'again'? Was this an abortion proceedure?

If all these questions give an answer that suggests that the tying of the fallopian tubes was malicious then fine, but if for some reason the Dr sincerely believed what she was doing was in the best medical interests of someone incapable of making that decision themselves then that's slightly different and the reprimand is more understandable.

Good post. Food for thought.

Man is made by his belief. As he believes, so he is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, it doesn't appear that this article was written by someone familiar w/ medical issues. I don't think that uterine lining "bursts." A lot of other stuff does, but not the uterine lining (maybe she said uterus? fallopian tubes? something else?).

Still, medical ethics is tricky. It would be interesting to know the full story. I don't think it's here.

Edited by Big Agnes!

K-1

March 7, 2005: I-129F NOA1

September 20, 2005: K-1 Interview in London. Visa received shortly thereafter.

AOS

December 30, 2005: I-485 received by USCIS

May 5, 2006: Interview at Phoenix district office. Approval pending FBI background check clearance. AOS finally approved almost two years later: February 14, 2008.

Received 10-year green card February 28, 2008

Your Humble Advice Columnist, Joyce

Come check out the most happenin' thread on VJ: Dear Joyce

Click here to see me visiting with my homebodies.

[The grooviest signature you've ever seen is under construction!]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...