New Theories Urgently Needed

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Video showing a plane crashing into the Pentagon on September 11, 2001, will be seen publicly for the first time on Tuesday, a judicial watchdog said.

The Department of Defense will release tapes showing American Airlines Flight 77 striking its headquarters outside Washington to Judicial Watch, a public interest group that requested the video, the group said.

The video will be available on the group's Web site after it receives the tape at 1 p.m., according to a news release from Judicial Watch.

Still photographs of the aftermath of the attack showed the Pentagon on fire but no images of the Boeing 757 striking the building have ever been made public. (Watch fireballs engulf ruined parts of the Pentagon -- 0:55)

"We fought hard to obtain this video because we felt that it was very important to complete the public record with respect to the terrorist attacks of September 11," said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.

"Finally, we hope that this video will put to rest the conspiracy theories involving American Airlines Flight 77. As always, our prayers remain with all those who suffered as a result of those murderous attacks."

Continued

[Fuzzness 2]

I will be watching this with great interest as I was never convinced that a 757 hit the pentagon. I guess my ideas will go out the window now

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

Where's my "Not this sh!t again" image when I need it?

[Welshcookie 17]

Where's my "Not this sh!t again" image when I need it?

there you go....I 'stole' it ages ago

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

Where's my "Not this sh!t again" image when I need it?

there you go....I 'stole' it ages ago

You are freaking amazing, welshcookie! Not to mention organized in a way I could never be

[cmartyn 0]

They probably got the same guys who made the moon landing video to make this one.

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

They probably got the same guys who made the moon landing video to make this one.

That's it? That's the new theory? You came up with that one quickly. Gotta give you that. But you could have done better, no?

[almaty 19]

hmmm....it took awhile for them to get the tape...

[yabasta 0]

Well the video could answer some questions but you still have to ask quewstions like:

How did a plane destroy a 110 floor steel building despite most of the fuel burning outside the building and that fuel not burning hot enough to melt steel? despite the fact that a plane of the same size(apparently) hit the pentagon and made a neat little hole right through 5 layers was it? Oh yeah and making such a small hole and leaving the lawn unmarked.

You are then left to ask why building 7 came down despite not being hit.

So you can then move onto the million other unanswered questions about the wtc attacks.

[Fuzzness 2]

don't forget that no CPR or FDR were found, despite being made out of some of the most indestructable stuff known to man, however one of the terrorist passports (paper)were found. or that no plane parts were ever found at the pentagon crash site. or that no poles in front of the crash site were bent, it looked more like someone pulled them out of the ground (also, normally the wings would be ripped completely off). or that there was no crater on the lawn just in front of the pentagon.

oh well. how dare i think anything other than what they have told me.

it probably really was AA77, probably really was terrorists. i just have questions that haven't been answered.

[crashandcari 0]

Well the video could answer some questions but you still have to ask quewstions like:

How did a plane destroy a 110 floor steel building despite most of the fuel burning outside the building and that fuel not burning hot enough to melt steel? despite the fact that a plane of the same size(apparently) hit the pentagon and made a neat little hole right through 5 layers was it? Oh yeah and making such a small hole and leaving the lawn unmarked.

You are then left to ask why building 7 came down despite not being hit.

So you can then move onto the million other unanswered questions about the wtc attacks.

erm... planes were stopped by the elevator shafts which then buckled under the intense heat of the fires from the fuel that fell into the buildings... the towers were built to withstand being hit by a jumbo jet accidentlly hitting them not used as missiles with full tanks of fuel...

as for 7 WTC.. considering one of the towers practically fell on it and the heat of the flames surrounding it i'm surprise lasted as long as it did..

god why do i look at these posts? i know we've been through this before and i have no problem with you guys and your theories but PLEASE have some respect for those of us who were in the middle of the attacks that day.. trust me.. you have no clue what it was like... what it felt like.. what it smelled like unless you were right here...

[Razor 0]

They probably got the same guys who made the moon landing video to make this one.

Stanley Kubrick was behind the moon landings

http://www.cbc.ca/passionateeyesunday/feature_161103.html

[evilcanuck 0]

if a plane didnt hit the pentagon.....what happened to it and all the peeps onboard????????????

am i missing something?

[SteveLaura 0]

if a plane didnt hit the pentagon.....what happened to it and all the peeps onboard????????????

am i missing something?

This site has a theory on that...

[rclouse 0]

OH MY GOD!