Obama's 'civilian national security force'

[Ggreen 12]

Easy with the personal attacks you bleeding hearts. Such compassion.

Look at #6 and zqt post history, and bring the personal attak result...

[Empress of Groovy 373]

I thought it was commonly held that #6 and zqt are the same person.

Hmm....

[Ggreen 12]

I thought it was commonly held that #6 and zqt are the same person.

Hmm....

...

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

As if you ever do.

Still with the bold text I see. As though the eye needs to be drawn to the fact that he/she/it rarely has anything of any substance to say.

Easy to say and in fact - easy to prove as well.

Page for page my post history has (a lot) more substantial arguments than yours.

Lets take a week's worth - feel free to prove me wrong.

Impossible, he/she/it may not reply to that.

I know for a fact he/she/it won't because he/she/it has nothing to offer to any topic except lip-flapping and the oh-so-clever plays on words like "Ovomit".

What wit and panache. Like #### it is

Anyway ignore Mr Lucky - its just about the bait for him.

Edited July 16, 2008 by Number 6

[Ggreen 12]

As if you ever do.

Still with the bold text I see. As though the eye needs to be drawn to the fact that he/she/it rarely has anything of any substance to say.

Easy to say and in fact - easy to prove as well.

Page for page my post history has (a lot) more substantial arguments than yours.

Lets take a week's worth - feel free to prove me wrong.

Impossible, he/she/it may not reply to that.

I know for a fact he/she/it won't because he/she/it has nothing to offer to any topic except lip-flapping and the oh-so-clever plays on words like "Ovomit".

What wit and panache. Like #### it is

Anyway ignore Mr Lucky - its just about the bait for him.

Well said.

[Chica Yeyé 41]

I think some people really do believe the Talk Radio assessment of Barack Obama as Far Left. Hell Michael Savage lambasts the guy every night calling him a socialist of the Soviet School. Go figure...

Can these people get any more alarmist? We have two career politicians running for President on behalf of the major parties. Its almost as if its not exciting enough to talk about if there's not something to be outraged by...

He he - if Barack Obama is far left, I am Salma Hayek's long lost twin

And I am outraged by the implication that all liberals are hippie tree-huggers . There are liberals with a sense of fashion, you know???? CHANEL & ARMANI FOR ALL!!!!

[Peikko 1,575]

Does being a tree hugger automatically preculde you from being fashionable, Birkenstocks and organic cotton T's notwithstanding?

[one...two...tree 2,762]

We could have civil war in this country and solve this polarization once and for all. Somebody draw a line in the sand.

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

We could have civil war in this country and solve this polarization once and for all. Somebody draw a line in the sand.

Politics is war.

[one...two...tree 2,762]

We could have civil war in this country and solve this polarization once and for all. Somebody draw a line in the sand.

Politics is war.

To some here apparently. Let's make it for reals...see which side wins.

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

We could have civil war in this country and solve this polarization once and for all. Somebody draw a line in the sand.

Politics is war.

To some here apparently. Let's make it for reals...see which side wins.

Politics is war. It already is real.

Unless you're talking about violent conflict. Liberals would lose.

[one...two...tree 2,762]

We could have civil war in this country and solve this polarization once and for all. Somebody draw a line in the sand.

Politics is war.

To some here apparently. Let's make it for reals...see which side wins.

Politics is war. It already is real.

Unless you're talking about violent conflict. Liberals would lose.

Yes, but some like to draw lines in the sand because their logic only works in opposites.

[zqt3344 21]

My your grasp of the English language is so good and classy, truly the only thing you know to do is how to cuss when you cannot plausibly explain your way out of the situation with a truly intellectual answer.

As if you ever do.

Still with the bold text I see. As though the eye needs to be drawn to the fact that he/she/it rarely has anything of any substance to say.

Easy to say and in fact - easy to prove as well.

Page for page my post history has (a lot) more substantial arguments than yours.

Lets take a week's worth - feel free to prove me wrong.

Impossible, he/she/it may not reply to that.

I know for a fact he/she/it won't because he/she/it has nothing to offer to any topic except lip-flapping and the oh-so-clever plays on words like "Ovomit".

What wit and panache. Like #### it is

Anyway ignore Mr Lucky - its just about the bait for him.

How cute, coming from the dove tree hugging liberal that you are, now you want to take up arms. HAHAAHa what will we see next on here! AHHA

We could have civil war in this country and solve this polarization once and for all. Somebody draw a line in the sand.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

My your grasp of the English language is so good and classy, truly the only thing you know to do is how to cuss when you cannot plausibly explain your way out of the situation with a truly intellectual answer.

As if you ever do.

Still with the bold text I see. As though the eye needs to be drawn to the fact that he/she/it rarely has anything of any substance to say.

Easy to say and in fact - easy to prove as well.

Page for page my post history has (a lot) more substantial arguments than yours.

Lets take a week's worth - feel free to prove me wrong.

Impossible, he/she/it may not reply to that.

I know for a fact he/she/it won't because he/she/it has nothing to offer to any topic except lip-flapping and the oh-so-clever plays on words like "Ovomit".

What wit and panache. Like #### it is

Anyway ignore Mr Lucky - its just about the bait for him.

Feel free to prove me wrong in my statement.

Can't? Won't? Then I humbly suggest that you STFU - like the spineless SOB we all know you to be

You don't do intellectual. I think most people here have already reached the same conclusion as I have...

[zqt3344 21]

Page for page all you ever do is blow your stack and cuss or complain about someone attacking you when you are the one that starts it but cannot finish it.

As if you ever do.

Still with the bold text I see. As though the eye needs to be drawn to the fact that he/she/it rarely has anything of any substance to say.

Easy to say and in fact - easy to prove as well.

Page for page my post history has (a lot) more substantial arguments than yours.

Lets take a week's worth - feel free to prove me wrong.

See, There you go again.

And proving my point, such a intellectual grasp of the English language!

My your grasp of the English language is so good and classy, truly the only thing you know to do is how to cuss when you cannot plausibly explain your way out of the situation with a truly intellectual answer.

As if you ever do.

Still with the bold text I see. As though the eye needs to be drawn to the fact that he/she/it rarely has anything of any substance to say.

Easy to say and in fact - easy to prove as well.

Page for page my post history has (a lot) more substantial arguments than yours.

Lets take a week's worth - feel free to prove me wrong.

Impossible, he/she/it may not reply to that.

I know for a fact he/she/it won't because he/she/it has nothing to offer to any topic except lip-flapping and the oh-so-clever plays on words like "Ovomit".

What wit and panache. Like #### it is

Anyway ignore Mr Lucky - its just about the bait for him.

Feel free to prove me wrong in my statement.

Can't? Won't? Then I humbly suggest that you STFU - like the spineless SOB we all know you to be

You don't do intellectual. I think most people here have already reached the same conclusion as I have...