mother loses kids

[Amby 490]

A Canadian woman who describes herself as a white nationalist lost custody of her children after sending her daughter to school twice with a swastika drawn on her arm, the CBC reported.

The Winnipeg mother told the CBC she regrets redrawing the Nazi symbol after a teacher scrubbed it off. She is fighting the child welfare system to regain custody of her daughter, 7, and son, 2, who were removed from her home four months ago.

"It was one of the stupidest things I've done in my life but it's no reason to take my kids," the unidentified woman told CBC News. She is currently allowed to see her kids for two hours a week.

Child and Family Services workers were alerted after the second swastika incident at school, the CBC reported. When they arrived at the family home they found neo-Nazi symbols and flags, and proceeded to seize the kids.

The case has sparked a debate over whether the police and child welfare authorities can take children away because of their parents’ beliefs.

"I'm willing to jump through their hoops," the woman told the CBC. "If they want me to deny my beliefs, I'll tell them that, but at the same time, I'm not a traitor to my politics, my beliefs. I just want my kids back."

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,380741,00.html

[Nagishkaw 510]

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

"It was one of the stupidest things I've done in my life but it's no reason to take my kids," the unidentified woman told CBC News.

She's right, though. It really isn't a good reason to take her kids.

[Amby 490]

"It was one of the stupidest things I've done in my life but it's no reason to take my kids," the unidentified woman told CBC News.

She's right, though. It really isn't a good reason to take her kids.

I agree!

[Ban Hammer 13,352]

more nanny state.

[Sassy1natl 0]

Wow

[Mags 112]

Ironically enough, I bet she is a better mother than many of the people out there who do still have custody of their kids.

[Jenn! 918]

Children should not be taken from their mothers except under the most extreme of circumstances. This is not one of them.

Children should not be taken from their mothers except under the most extreme of circumstances. This is not one of them.

[Sassy1natl 0]

Ironically enough, I bet she is a better mother than many of the people out there who do still have custody of their kids.

Exactly what I was thinking.

[Mags 112]

Children should not be taken from their mothers except under the most extreme of circumstances. This is not one of them.

Children should not be taken from their mothers except under the most extreme of circumstances. This is not one of them.

You can say that again!

[eric&gen 0]

Double post.

[Heracles 417]

Canada obviously does not have an anything goes first amendment for clowns like that to hide under. So if she is teaching her kids ####### then she should have them taken away from her.

[Jenn! 918]

Children should not be taken from their mothers except under the most extreme of circumstances. This is not one of them.

[eric&gen 0]

Children should not be taken from their mothers except under the most extreme of circumstances. This is not one of them.

[Heracles 417]

Children should not be taken from their mothers except under the most extreme of circumstances. This is not one of them.

Different country. Different sets of rules. It obviously works for them considering their living standard and quality of life.