Tacky celebrities

[Savanphil 3]

Amen to that!

However, on Flavor of Love did anyone see when the girl sh*t herself on tv while they were sitting for dinner. I nearly puked.

He is the WORST.....just plain awful.

Edited July 14, 2008 by Savanphil

[panamania79 2]

David Hasslehoff. I turn the TV over if he comes on.

I used to think he was hot in Night Rider,but then again I was in 10th grade and didn't know any better.

[Marilyn. 340]

Amen to that!

However, on Flavor of Love did anyone see when the girl sh*t herself on tv while they were sitting for dinner. I nearly puked.

He is the WORST.....just plain awful.

yeah I think I have to agree .. he is the most tackiest...

[Teacher Mark 53]

Leonardo diCaprio. He's not tacky. He just annoys me.

A LOT.

He's annoyed me since I saw him in "What's eating Gilbert Grape."

BLAHHHHHH! That movie was excellent!

He was flippin' nominated for an Academy Award for that performance!

I know but he was still annoying !

Here watch this. I thought about running over myself with my truck after I watched it:

Edited July 15, 2008 by WideAwakeInTheUSA

[Alex & Rachel 78]

i cant stand brad and angelina either. this woman at work said how good hearted they were and how giving they are and i said i think its all fake....yeah make a fortune off ur babies picture and donate it to charity is real giving...why did u sell ur childs face to get money to give to someone else. they didnt have enough money in their bank account that they had to sell a pic to get more money. pleeeeeezzzzzz

Actually they do donate a huge proportion of their earnings - more than most of us could ever give. Yes, they can afford it (and most of us can't), but at the same time it is their own hard-earned money (actors do work long hours, and they are involved in a few other projects beside). I imagine that when you're in the public eye as much as they are that you have a certain image to maintain, and part of that involves spending quite a bit of money. Not to mention that acting work often dries up as you grow older, or at the very least you tend to earn less, so they need to keep some in order to safeguard their and their children's future.

As for selling the baby photos? I don't mind that at all, either. It's not Brad and Angelina's fault that some magazine is willing to pay them stupid amounts of money to do so. In fact, I think I'd do it too if I were them. After all, you get professionally-taken photos which you get to personally approve (as opposed to seeing some random, street-snatched photo plastered all over the papers, because like it or not those babies are eventually going to be photographed somehow) and you get paid for it, and you then have a chance to donate a large sum of money to the charity of your choice.

I've also heard that at least one of them is at home with the children at any given time, which I think is wonderful. People complain about them having six children but I don't hear them also lambasting every other ordinary family with six children. Six is a good number and again, if I were them I'd probably want that many, too.

#1:

#2:

#3:

/hotlinked

Yup...

[Sassy1natl 0]

The video made me wanna cry. I never saw Gilbert Grape. Now I know why.

[DairyFarmer 1]

I hate when I get sucked in. Like I'm reading a mag and my vouyeristic side goes into overdrive.

[warriorprincess 0]

Paris Hilton can do it all night long.

Only if there is a camera and horrible lighting

and even then she's a terrible actress.

I must admit I'm intrigued with celebs. I can't resist those rag mags at the checkout counter. Call it my guilty pleasure.

[Teacher Mark 53]

i cant stand brad and angelina either. this woman at work said how good hearted they were and how giving they are and i said i think its all fake....yeah make a fortune off ur babies picture and donate it to charity is real giving...why did u sell ur childs face to get money to give to someone else. they didnt have enough money in their bank account that they had to sell a pic to get more money. pleeeeeezzzzzz

Actually they do donate a huge proportion of their earnings - more than most of us could ever give. Yes, they can afford it (and most of us can't), but at the same time it is their own hard-earned money (actors do work long hours, and they are involved in a few other projects beside). I imagine that when you're in the public eye as much as they are that you have a certain image to maintain, and part of that involves spending quite a bit of money. Not to mention that acting work often dries up as you grow older, or at the very least you tend to earn less, so they need to keep some in order to safeguard their and their children's future.

As for selling the baby photos? I don't mind that at all, either. It's not Brad and Angelina's fault that some magazine is willing to pay them stupid amounts of money to do so. In fact, I think I'd do it too if I were them. After all, you get professionally-taken photos which you get to personally approve (as opposed to seeing some random, street-snatched photo plastered all over the papers, because like it or not those babies are eventually going to be photographed somehow) and you get paid for it, and you then have a chance to donate a large sum of money to the charity of your choice.

I've also heard that at least one of them is at home with the children at any given time, which I think is wonderful. People complain about them having six children but I don't hear them also lambasting every other ordinary family with six children. Six is a good number and again, if I were them I'd probably want that many, too.

#1:

#2:

#3:

/hotlinked

Yup...

Ditto.

The video made me wanna cry. I never saw Gilbert Grape. Now I know why.

That is an outstanding movie. The video they made just sucks! You should rent it and judge for yourself. I bet you really will cry!

Edited July 15, 2008 by WideAwakeInTheUSA