Jump to content
kyle&ghing

Regarding Sex Offenders (off probabtion)

 Share

34 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Philippines
Timeline

Does anyone know if there have been ANY rulings from the USCIS in reference to the John Walsh Ammendment for petitioners who are registered sex offenders, who have been GRANTED their right to petition for a VISA on behalf of a foreign fiancee with no children? I know this law is very new and there may not even be any rulings on this. If anyone can shed light on this, I would appreciate it. Thank you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 33
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Filed: Other Country: China
Timeline
Does anyone know if there have been ANY rulings from the USCIS in reference to the John Walsh Ammendment for petitioners who are registered sex offenders, who have been GRANTED their right to petition for a VISA on behalf of a foreign fiancee with no children? I know this law is very new and there may not even be any rulings on this. If anyone can shed light on this, I would appreciate it. Thank you.

Just for clarification, a sex offender impacted by the law would have the right to file a petition but I think you want to know about the possibility of the petition being approved.

Facts are cheap...knowing how to use them is precious...
Understanding the big picture is priceless. Anonymous

Google Who is Pushbrk?

A Warning to Green Card Holders About Voting

http://www.visajourney.com/forums/topic/606646-a-warning-to-green-card-holders-about-voting/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone know if there have been ANY rulings from the USCIS in reference to the John Walsh Ammendment for petitioners who are registered sex offenders, who have been GRANTED their right to petition for a VISA on behalf of a foreign fiancee with no children? I know this law is very new and there may not even be any rulings on this. If anyone can shed light on this, I would appreciate it. Thank you.

Just for clarification, a sex offender impacted by the law would have the right to file a petition but I think you want to know about the possibility of the petition being approved.

I dont know anything about this situation, but I think if you contact your local district congressman they might be able to help you. They have helped me with questions about immigration a few times:-) Was it a felony, or not a serious offense? I have heard even people who were in prison could still petition someone. I had a DUI and was worried about that but my congressman said dont worry thats not a reason unless I have many then it could be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Philippines
Timeline
Does anyone know if there have been ANY rulings from the USCIS in reference to the John Walsh Ammendment for petitioners who are registered sex offenders, who have been GRANTED their right to petition for a VISA on behalf of a foreign fiancee with no children? I know this law is very new and there may not even be any rulings on this. If anyone can shed light on this, I would appreciate it. Thank you.

Just for clarification, a sex offender impacted by the law would have the right to file a petition but I think you want to know about the possibility of the petition being approved.

Yes, exactly. I have read an interoffice memorandum at the USCIS regarding how to handle these specific cases and the proof of burden does exist on the petitioner, however there is no "out of hand" rejection implicit in the law or any of the statements that I have read from the USCIS.

There is actually statements on what kind of information would be helpful to build a case for an individual in these circumstances where the petitioner is petitioning a single beneficiary without children (which is the case I am referring to). In regards to this I was wondering 2 things:

1) Have you heard of a case like this being apporved or rejected? AND

2) What would be the specific waiver form signed in this case?

Thank you so much for your consideration.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Philippines
Timeline
Does anyone know if there have been ANY rulings from the USCIS in reference to the John Walsh Ammendment for petitioners who are registered sex offenders, who have been GRANTED their right to petition for a VISA on behalf of a foreign fiancee with no children? I know this law is very new and there may not even be any rulings on this. If anyone can shed light on this, I would appreciate it. Thank you.

Just for clarification, a sex offender impacted by the law would have the right to file a petition but I think you want to know about the possibility of the petition being approved.

I dont know anything about this situation, but I think if you contact your local district congressman they might be able to help you. They have helped me with questions about immigration a few times:-) Was it a felony, or not a serious offense? I have heard even people who were in prison could still petition someone. I had a DUI and was worried about that but my congressman said dont worry thats not a reason unless I have many then it could be.

Thank you so much for your kind & helpful response. I had somebody else offer that same advice to me and I think it is a great idea. I will do that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: AOS (apr) Country: Philippines
Timeline
Does anyone know if there have been ANY rulings from the USCIS in reference to the John Walsh Ammendment for petitioners who are registered sex offenders, who have been GRANTED their right to petition for a VISA on behalf of a foreign fiancee with no children? I know this law is very new and there may not even be any rulings on this. If anyone can shed light on this, I would appreciate it. Thank you.

Just for clarification, a sex offender impacted by the law would have the right to file a petition but I think you want to know about the possibility of the petition being approved.

Actually, if I am not mistaken, the Adam Walsh amendment (if applicable) makes the USC ineligible to file a petition. I am uncertain if the ineligibility is waiverable or not. So I agree, the USC can file but the chances of success are about nil.

Edited by fwaguy

YMMV

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Timeline
Does anyone know if there have been ANY rulings from the USCIS in reference to the John Walsh Ammendment for petitioners who are registered sex offenders, who have been GRANTED their right to petition for a VISA on behalf of a foreign fiancee with no children? I know this law is very new and there may not even be any rulings on this. If anyone can shed light on this, I would appreciate it. Thank you.

Just for clarification, a sex offender impacted by the law would have the right to file a petition but I think you want to know about the possibility of the petition being approved.

Actually, if I am not mistaken, the Adam Walsh amendment (if applicable) makes the USC ineligible to file a petition. I am uncertain if the ineligibility is waiverable or not. So I agree, the USC can file but the chances of success are about nil.

That is also my understanding.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But the OP states that he's been "GRANTED their right to petition for a VISA on behalf of a foreign fiancee with no children"...what does that mean? Is there a pre-petition permission that can be sought in such cases?

-P

Edited by Minya's wife
funny-dog-pictures-wtf.jpg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Philippines
Timeline
But the OP states that he's been "GRANTED their right to petition for a VISA on behalf of a foreign fiancee with no children"...what does that mean? Is there a pre-petition permission that can be sought in such cases?

-P

Actually I have not been "granted permission" as of yet. I was asking a question about any known cases as such. As far as the USCIS is concerned, since that last posting, I have found an inter-office memo that states the conditions of review of such a case. Here is an excerpt:

[uSCIS MEMO dated February 8, 2007]

"In determining whether a petitioner poses any risk to his or her intended beneficiary, the

adjudicator must consider all known factors that are relevant to determining whether the

petitioner poses any risk to the safety and well-being of the beneficiary. Factors that should be

considered include, but are not limited to, the following:

• The nature and severity of the petitioner’s specified offense(s) against a minor,

including all facts and circumstances underlying the offense(s);

• The petitioner’s criminal history;

• The nature, severity, and mitigating circumstances of any arrest(s), conviction(s), or

history of alcohol or substance abuse, sexual or child abuse, domestic violence, or

other violent or criminal behavior that may pose a risk to the safety or well-being of

the principal beneficiary or any derivative beneficiary;

• The relationship of the petitioner to the principal beneficiary and any derivative

beneficiary;

• The age and, if relevant, the gender of the beneficiary;

• Whether the petitioner and beneficiary will be residing either in the same household

or within close proximity to one another; and

• The degree of rehabilitation or behavior modification that may alleviate any risk

posed by the petitioner to the beneficiary, evidenced by the successful completion of

appropriate counseling or rehabilitation programs and the significant passage of time

between incidence of violent, criminal, or abusive behavior and the submission of the

petition."

Being that there are provisions for review, it is obvious that there is no "out of hand" rejection implied by this Adam Walsh Law. The sole discretion is at the hands of the USCIS. IN addition there is also a process of "appeal" if the waiver is denied for both K1 & K3 Visa applicants.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: K-1 Visa Country: Philippines
Timeline
The sole discretion is at the hands of the USCIS SUPERVISER..

Yes, specifically and I quote from the inter-office memo I mentioned above:

"3) HQ Clearance of Approval Recommendations

If the adjudicator finds that the petitioner poses no risk to the beneficiary, the adjudicator

must seek the guidance and direction of USCIS Headquarters, Regulations and Product

Management Division, before approving the petition. Adjudicators are prohibited from

exercising favorable discretion in such instances without the consent of USCIS Headquarters."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Timeline

I don't think anyone could really tell you either way. Even if you find one case (which I haven't yet) it is so dependent on the individual facts of each case that you could only draw parallels.

If it were me: I would put in the application (assuming the $$ wouldn't bankrupt me) and know that the worse thing they could say is NO.

You have an uphill battle since the social stigma behind sex offenders is pretty harsh. (I'm sure I don't need to tell you that.) But if you could prove your case, then go for it. Things that would help: Single violation rather than a history. Severity of the crime. Receiving/Completing counseling. A letter of remorse/apology. Letters of character from friends/relatives.

Nothing I say is legal advice. I recommend you consult a qualified immigration attorney for any questions you may have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does your fiancee know that you are registered sex offender???

what a prize catch....excuse me, but I hope you fail.

Hi again did you try calling your local Congressman Rep? they help many with immigration issues and even help then through the filing process. With any luck they have already handled some cases like yours or know of another rep that has:-) And if it is something like having sex with a minor like 16 when the guy is 18 I think that should not be a big deal as long as both agreed to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Filed: Other Timeline
Does your fiancee know that you are registered sex offender???

what a prize catch....excuse me, but I hope you fail.

The very purpose of the Adam Walsh Act (as it applies here) is to notify an intending immigrant of their sponsers past in order to avoid abuse. If his fiance doesn't know, she will know before long.

Nothing I say is legal advice. I recommend you consult a qualified immigration attorney for any questions you may have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
Didn't find the answer you were looking for? Ask our VJ Immigration Lawyers.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
- Back to Top -

Important Disclaimer: Please read carefully the Visajourney.com Terms of Service. If you do not agree to the Terms of Service you should not access or view any page (including this page) on VisaJourney.com. Answers and comments provided on Visajourney.com Forums are general information, and are not intended to substitute for informed professional medical, psychiatric, psychological, tax, legal, investment, accounting, or other professional advice. Visajourney.com does not endorse, and expressly disclaims liability for any product, manufacturer, distributor, service or service provider mentioned or any opinion expressed in answers or comments. VisaJourney.com does not condone immigration fraud in any way, shape or manner. VisaJourney.com recommends that if any member or user knows directly of someone involved in fraudulent or illegal activity, that they report such activity directly to the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. You can contact ICE via email at Immigration.Reply@dhs.gov or you can telephone ICE at 1-866-347-2423. All reported threads/posts containing reference to immigration fraud or illegal activities will be removed from this board. If you feel that you have found inappropriate content, please let us know by contacting us here with a url link to that content. Thank you.
×
×
  • Create New...