McCain: "I do not support Roe v Wade, it should be overturned"

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

You said that all they should run is the CIA, FBI and the Armed Forces. My response was just to illustrate that the Feds have a number of other and rather important things to run. That's all.

Immigration and diplomatic missions abroad, fine.

Still don't see why they should get the lion's share of our tax money.

What about CDC, EPA, FAA, NHTSA, FEMA, ... ?

[mawilson 2,133]

You said that all they should run is the CIA, FBI and the Armed Forces. My response was just to illustrate that the Feds have a number of other and rather important things to run. That's all.

Immigration and diplomatic missions abroad, fine.

Still don't see why they should get the lion's share of our tax money.

What about CDC, EPA, FAA, NHTSA, FEMA, ... ?

EPA, NHTSA and FEMA - don't need (we've seen how "effective" FEMA is anyway)

FAA - needed to regulate air traffic across state lines

CDC - maybe (could be done at state level too)

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

You said that all they should run is the CIA, FBI and the Armed Forces. My response was just to illustrate that the Feds have a number of other and rather important things to run. That's all.

Immigration and diplomatic missions abroad, fine.

Still don't see why they should get the lion's share of our tax money.

What about CDC, EPA, FAA, NHTSA, FEMA, ... ?

EPA, NHTSA and FEMA - don't need (we've seen how "effective" FEMA is anyway)

FAA - needed to regulate air traffic across state lines

CDC - maybe (could be done at state level too)

So you want to pay more taxes to your state and fragment the country on anything but foreign matters? Are you sure that that will be cheaper and more efficient?

[mawilson 2,133]

You said that all they should run is the CIA, FBI and the Armed Forces. My response was just to illustrate that the Feds have a number of other and rather important things to run. That's all.

Immigration and diplomatic missions abroad, fine.

Still don't see why they should get the lion's share of our tax money.

What about CDC, EPA, FAA, NHTSA, FEMA, ... ?

EPA, NHTSA and FEMA - don't need (we've seen how "effective" FEMA is anyway)

FAA - needed to regulate air traffic across state lines

CDC - maybe (could be done at state level too)

So you want to pay more taxes to your state and fragment the country on anything but foreign matters? Are you sure that that will be cheaper and more efficient?

Yes.

[SaadBell 0]