McCain: "I do not support Roe v Wade, it should be overturned"

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

[zqt3344 21]

Stir it baby stir it! OBEY I SAY for I am the great orator of Chicago!

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

Stir it baby stir it!

Is he, or is he not, fervently anti-choice?

[zqt3344 21]

Hard to say what do you make of him?

Stir it baby stir it!

Is he, or is he not, fervently anti-choice?

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

It isn't "hard to say" at all

[zqt3344 21]

LOL wonder what Number 6 and Mr Big Dog and all other OVOMIT followers think?

It isn't "hard to say" at all

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Yep - he's trying to make himself attractive to Christian Conservatives. Nothing new there - the stereotypical Republican party position.

[Sheriff Uling 3]

Someone made a comment that the country is moving towards the left from the more conservative views that have dominated for at least the past four decades. I must admit there has been a shift and the country is beginning to adapt more liberal views, and I understand how that has happened. So statements like these will be met with more opposition than in times past, especially from a new generation that has embraced a way of life and lifestyles different from generations past. The paradigm is shifting. The question becomes how are conservatives going to adjust or adapt in this evolution that is occurring in the general population?

[HAL 9000 96]

Perhaps it should be overturned-

to make way for legislation that safeguards a woman's right to choose.

That way we won't have a panel of 9 ideologically-appointed judges deciding the constitutionality of women's reproductive rights.

[Sheriff Uling 3]

Perhaps it should be overturned-

to make way for legislation that safeguards a woman's right to choose.

That way we won't have a panel of 9 ideologically-appointed judges deciding the constitutionality of women's reproductive rights.

Do you mean that Row vs. Wade should be overturned in hopes that legistation will be passed at the state level safegarding a woman's right to choose?

[HAL 9000 96]

Perhaps it should be overturned-

to make way for legislation that safeguards a woman's right to choose.

That way we won't have a panel of 9 ideologically-appointed judges deciding the constitutionality of women's reproductive rights.

Do you mean that Row vs. Wade should be overturned in hopes that legistation will be passed at the state level safegarding a woman's right to choose?

This has to go above the stale level, in my opinion. There should be a uniform protection since women do not have differing reproductive organs across state lines.

[GaryC 7]

Stir it baby stir it!

Is he, or is he not, fervently anti-choice?

He isn't anti-choice. He feels that this is a state rights issue. He feels, as I do, this isn't something the federal government should be into. If a state wants legal abortions then that is fine. If they don't then that is also fine. Overturning Roe V Wade isn't going to make abortions illegal but just put the issue where it belongs, in the states.

[Amby 490]

anyone who believes that women shouldn't have the right to choose should have their d*ck tied into a knot

[zqt3344 21]

Amby Hamby, women are in a constant state of emotional fit, so how on earth are they going to be able to make a sound rational decision for themselves. And women should not be allowed to make the decision by themselves, they need help and guidance always. And most men enjoy having their ####### tied in a knot.

anyone who believes that women shouldn't have the right to choose should have their d*ck tied into a knot

[Ban Hammer 13,352]

anyone who believes that women shouldn't have the right to choose should have their d*ck tied into a knot

if the woman can do that with her tongue, i'm all for it.