During hurricane evacuation, Border Patrol to check immigration status of evacuees

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

For K1's: during the period of time starting from 90 days from entry to when EAD is received, there is really no proof of status at all.

[HAL 9000 96]

Well for fairness I also added "yellows" in the mix so those with Asian SOs don't feel left out. I guess we can also add "cream" and "olive" to the list of colors I suppose.

I'm pinkish beige myself...

"pinkish beige" added to the list!

[jundp 191]

nice...

It's crazy. The hysteria surrounding illegal immigrants has gone way too far.

you're right, we instead should transport them somewhere else and release them!

The time to look for illegals is before and after. Not during the evacuation.

Seriously.

[Sister Fracas 5]

For K1's: during the period of time starting from 90 days from entry to when EAD is received, there is really no proof of status at all.

I guess the passport would be sufficient though because it would show legal entry.

It's still crazy though.

Edited May 16, 2008 by Sister Fracas

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

For K1's: during the period of time starting from 90 days from entry to when EAD is received, there is really no proof of status at all.

I guess the passport would be sufficient though because it would show legal entry.

The passport will have a cancelled out K1 visa.

Proof of legal entry is not proof of valid status. One can enter legally and then lapse.

[HAL 9000 96]

For K1's: during the period of time starting from 90 days from entry to when EAD is received, there is really no proof of status at all.

I guess the passport would be sufficient though because it would show legal entry.

Even though an idiot can see that these entry visas expire... and no further proof means that that idiot would detain just to be safe.

[Sister Fracas 5]

For K1's: during the period of time starting from 90 days from entry to when EAD is received, there is really no proof of status at all.

I guess the passport would be sufficient though because it would show legal entry.

The passport will have a cancelled out K1 visa.

Proof of legal entry is not proof of valid status. One can enter legally and then lapse.

No, I get ya...and then it comes down to somenoe making a judgement call... no thanks.

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

For K1's: during the period of time starting from 90 days from entry to when EAD is received, there is really no proof of status at all.

I guess the passport would be sufficient though because it would show legal entry.

The passport will have a cancelled out K1 visa.

Proof of legal entry is not proof of valid status. One can enter legally and then lapse.

No, I get ya...and then it comes down to somenoe making a judgement call... no thanks.

If the judgment call is made by someone with the proper training in immigration law (say, a USCIS officer) I would be ok with it.

[Ban Hammer 13,352]

Well for fairness I also added "yellows" in the mix so those with Asian SOs don't feel left out. I guess we can also add "cream" and "olive" to the list of colors I suppose.

I'm pinkish beige myself...

you look black and white in your avatar

For K1's: during the period of time starting from 90 days from entry to when EAD is received, there is really no proof of status at all.

I guess the passport would be sufficient though because it would show legal entry.

The passport will have a cancelled out K1 visa.

Proof of legal entry is not proof of valid status. One can enter legally and then lapse.

No, I get ya...and then it comes down to somenoe making a judgement call... no thanks.

If the judgment call is made by someone with the proper training in immigration law (say, a USCIS officer) I would be ok with it.

who did you think would be doing it? joe average police officer?

[Sister Fracas 5]

If the judgment call is made by someone with the proper training in immigration law (say, a USCIS officer) I would be ok with it.

I trust USCIS less... LOL

The point is I don't think this is something that can be done in a timely manner to ensure everyone gets to safety quickly.

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

Well for fairness I also added "yellows" in the mix so those with Asian SOs don't feel left out. I guess we can also add "cream" and "olive" to the list of colors I suppose.

I'm pinkish beige myself...

you look black and white in your avatar

For K1's: during the period of time starting from 90 days from entry to when EAD is received, there is really no proof of status at all.

I guess the passport would be sufficient though because it would show legal entry.

The passport will have a cancelled out K1 visa.

Proof of legal entry is not proof of valid status. One can enter legally and then lapse.

No, I get ya...and then it comes down to somenoe making a judgement call... no thanks.

If the judgment call is made by someone with the proper training in immigration law (say, a USCIS officer) I would be ok with it.

who did you think would be doing it? joe average police officer?

There has been a lot of talk lately in this state of letting cops make those calls. Frankly, the prospect is scary.

USCIS I have no problem with. Those people are good.

If the judgment call is made by someone with the proper training in immigration law (say, a USCIS officer) I would be ok with it.

I trust USCIS less... LOL

The point is I don't think this is something that can be done in a timely manner to ensure everyone gets to safety quickly.

They may be slow but they know the rules. They're cool.

[jundp 191]

If the judgment call is made by someone with the proper training in immigration law (say, a USCIS officer) I would be ok with it.

I trust USCIS less... LOL

The point is I don't think this is something that can be done in a timely manner to ensure everyone gets to safety quickly.

And am I going to be separated from my husband/child/mother/etc because I am a USC and they don't have "proper proof"?

[mawilson 2,133]

as good a time as any, isn't it?

Not really.

[HAL 9000 96]

For K1's: during the period of time starting from 90 days from entry to when EAD is received, there is really no proof of status at all.

I guess the passport would be sufficient though because it would show legal entry.

The passport will have a cancelled out K1 visa.

Proof of legal entry is not proof of valid status. One can enter legally and then lapse.

No, I get ya...and then it comes down to somenoe making a judgement call... no thanks.

If the judgment call is made by someone with the proper training in immigration law (say, a USCIS officer) I would be ok with it.

Unfortunately, even USCIS officers make mistakes.

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

Subject matter experts make mistakes all the time. Surgeons screw up and people die. It happens. All I'm saying is, if a call must be made, I'd rather have the SME do it than someone else.

ETA: I still maintain that during an evac is not the right time to do it.

Edited May 16, 2008 by VJ Troll