Weary Democratic voters 'unimpressed' by both candidates

[GaryC 7]

Tired voters say Democrats' primary fight divisive

By Andrew Stern

CHICAGO (Reuters) - Many Democrats are frustrated and fatigued by the longest U.S. presidential nomination battle most have witnessed, and the divisions in its wake have left some wondering if they can back the ultimate winner.

"I backed Hillary in the (Wisconsin) primary, but no matter which one gets in, I'm unimpressed by both of them at this point," said Linda Mrochinski, who works for a nonprofit organization in Milwaukee.

"Instead of a policy-based and a 'what we can do' campaign, it's become a campaign of the women versus the blacks. It's just not a very comfortable campaign at this point," she added.

Random interviews conducted after Tuesday night's split voting, in which New York Sen. Hillary Clinton eked out a victory in Indiana and Illinois Sen. Barack Obama won handily in North Carolina, showed many voters would like the Democrats to get it over with.

"Pick somebody, because I think it's probably hurting them in November," said 23-year-old Chicago software developer Matt Sawin, an Obama supporter who said he would back Clinton if she won the nomination to run against Republican presidential candidate John McCain in the November election. "It's going to be messy, no matter what."

In exit polls of Democratic primary voters in Indiana and North Carolina by ABC, more than six in 10 said they would be satisfied with either Obama or Clinton as the nominee, leaving substantial numbers unsatisfied. In Clinton and Obama matchups against McCain, anywhere from a quarter to three in 10 Democrats said they wouldn't vote, or would support McCain.

Merlyn Ware, 37, of Robbinsdale, Minnesota, a town northwest of Minneapolis, is an Obama supporter who said he would not back Clinton if Obama loses the nomination.

"I wouldn't vote for a Republican. I'm going to vote, but maybe for a third party" in that case, he said.

After Tuesday's contests, Clinton vowed to fight on though Obama widened his lead in pledged delegates to the party nominating convention in August.

Many Democrats say the battle has dragged on too long. "I think it needs to end, like, within the next week," said Lisa Gibson, 33, a homemaker in Louisville, Kentucky.

"I care for both candidates actually. I would rather have them come together on the same ticket because I think if any more really bad campaigning goes on I think it's going to alienate one or the other," she said.

WIN-WIN?

"For me it's a win-win," said Allyn Travis, the director of the Montessori Institute of Milwaukee. "Obama is my preference because I love his optimism ... the Clintons have baggage. But, if it comes down to a choice between Hillary and McCain, I'm with Hillary all the way."

But Clinton supporter Herb Buecher of Charleston, South Carolina, said he would no longer back Obama after hearing controversial remarks by Obama's former pastor, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright.

"I can't support a man who sits for 20 years and listens to that rhetoric and then says he didn't hear it," he said of Wright's comments, which have included the assertion the U.S. government purposefully spread the AIDS virus to blacks and the September 11 attacks were payback for U.S. foreign policy.

Buecher said he would vote for McCain if Obama wins the party nod.

Clinton's gender and Obama's race -- she is vying to become the first woman president, he the first black president -- may be a factor in hardening some voters' loyalties.

Others were turned off by what they saw as Clinton's harsh attacks in the back-and-forth between the two Democrats.

"I don't like her politics. She's nasty," said Susan Crozier, 68, who works at a law firm in Blaine, Minnesota, and backs Obama.

Crozier and some others not aligned with either party said that in spite of the infighting among Democrats, they could not stand having another Republican in the White House out of dislike for President George W. Bush.

"Either way, whatever Democrat wins the nomination I'm ready for a change of party in the White House. Normally I vote for the person and not the party, but not this time," said Dean Davis, 42, a health care worker in Nashville, Tennessee.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080507/pl_nm/...itics_divide_dc

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

That doesn't mean they'll abstain or vote for McCain in November.

Once the race is over - people will come around, and they'll realise (like you did) that for them any candidate from their is preferable to McC.

[dalegg 143]

That doesn't mean they'll abstain or vote for McCain in November.

Once the race is over - people will come around, and they'll realise (like you did) that for them any candidate from their is preferable to McC.

Nah, you'll see. Once they go head to head in debates McCain is going to have Obama's head spinning with his incredible wit and charm. The democratic voters will be so smitten with how loose and fluid McCain is when he speaks, they'll be swarming to the booths to vote for him.

Just kidding, American voters are too smart to use a mans personality in deciding who they vote for.

[GaryC 7]

That doesn't mean they'll abstain or vote for McCain in November.

Once the race is over - people will come around, and they'll realise (like you did) that for them any candidate from their is preferable to McC.

Nah, you'll see. Once they go head to head in debates McCain is going to have Obama's head spinning with his incredible wit and charm. The democratic voters will be so smitten with how loose and fluid McCain is when he speaks, they'll be swarming to the booths to vote for him.

Just kidding, American voters are too smart to use a mans personality in deciding who they vote for.

There is the joke. That is all Obama has. The 571's will tear him a new azzhole in the general and all the charm in the world will not save him.

[LaL 418]

Just kidding, American voters are too smart to use a mans personality in deciding who they vote for.

I can think of several situations in which the personality very much did affect decisions.

[dalegg 143]

Just kidding, American voters are too smart to use a mans personality in deciding who they vote for.

I can think of several situations in which the personality very much did affect decisions.

It always does. I was being sarcastic.

[Peikko 1,575]

I don't know anymore Number 6 - what you say should make sense, but US voters don't seem to work on any pattern of logic that I recognise when it comes to the presidential election. What's for sure, the US'll get a mediocre president yet again.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

I don't know anymore Number 6 - what you say should make sense, but US voters don't seem to work on any pattern of logic that I recognise when it comes to the presidential election. What's for sure, the US'll get a mediocre president yet again.

That was clear from the getgo.

[one...two...tree 2,762]

American voters are too smart to use a mans personality in deciding who they vote for.

Exactly. That's why they voted for Bush over Gore and Kerry - intelligence over charm.

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

American voters are too smart to use a mans personality in deciding who they vote for.

Exactly. That's why they voted for Bush over Gore and Kerry - intelligence over charm.

God Bush had no personality. A vague yokel charm maybe...

[Sheriff Uling 3]

This is more radical conservative republican propaganda...

[one...two...tree 2,762]

American voters are too smart to use a mans personality in deciding who they vote for.

Exactly. That's why they voted for Bush over Gore and Kerry - intelligence over charm.

God Bush had no personality. A vague yokel charm maybe...

Unfortunately, neither did Kerry or Gore. However, when it came to intelligence, they could arm wrestle Dubbya with both arms tied behind their backs...but that didn't seem to matter to a the majority of Americans.

[Sheriff Uling 3]

This is more radical conservative republican propaganda...

Hmmm.. Radical conservative republicans remind me of muslim extremist minus the wanting to kill us thing...

[Dr. Obvious 49]

That was clear from the getgo.

Exactly why all this debate is a waste of time. Red Delicious or Granny Smith? Who cares. I would rather eat apples than oranges, so just toss me an apple. That is about what this race means to me.

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

The 571's will tear him a new azzhole in the general and all the charm in the world will not save him.

If you think McCain's gaffe's, plunders, flip-flopping and generally confused state of mind as of recent won't be exposed, you're seriously kidding yourself. And if you think McCain is about to have a cakewalk to 1600 Penn Ave, you're in for some bad news. The wind is going to start blowing. And it's going to come from 1200. As I said earlier, better get some strong folks behind the ole' man to make sure he don't fall over.