Halperin: Clinton will fight on

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

SOURCE: CLINTON WILL MAKE REMARKS SOON MAKING UNAMBIGUOUSLY CLEAR HER INTENTION TO FIGHT ON

http://thepage.time.com/2008/05/06/cbs-new...n-wins-indiana/

[Dan J 277]

Do you think that wasnt expected?

The question is, will she get the donations she needs to continue campaigning, and will her superdelegates still stay behind her.

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

She'll lose the support she needs to fight on. She might actually fight but nobody will care. Fact of he matter is that we have a stubborn President at present. There's really no need or desire to have another one.

[mawilson 2,133]

She'll lose the support she needs to fight on. She might actually fight but nobody will care. Fact of he matter is that we have a stubborn President at present. There's really no need or desire to have another one.

We do need a President who's a fighter - nothing wrong with that.

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

She'll lose the support she needs to fight on. She might actually fight but nobody will care. Fact of he matter is that we have a stubborn President at present. There's really no need or desire to have another one.

We do need a President who's a fighter - nothing wrong with that.

We need a President who can appropriately judge what battles to fight.

[mawilson 2,133]

She'll lose the support she needs to fight on. She might actually fight but nobody will care. Fact of he matter is that we have a stubborn President at present. There's really no need or desire to have another one.

We do need a President who's a fighter - nothing wrong with that.

We need a President who can appropriately judge what battles to fight.

I guess we'll find out soon enough B)

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

She'll lose the support she needs to fight on. She might actually fight but nobody will care. Fact of he matter is that we have a stubborn President at present. There's really no need or desire to have another one.

We do need a President who's a fighter - nothing wrong with that.

We need a President who can appropriately judge what battles to fight.

I guess we'll find out soon enough B)

Indeed.

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

Russert just said what I've been saying for awhile tonight: that we now know who the Democratic nominee is. The fact is that with the way Obama totally obliterated Clinton in NC today, the math is stacked solidly against Clinton - even if you take MI and FL in. Clinton has apparently canceled all of her appearances on the morning shows for tomorrow. This is not what a winner that is about to charge on is doing. She's out. Give her time to figure out how to do it gracefully, but she'll be out.

[William33 110]

Curious on that judgement call....

Edited May 7, 2008 by William33