Check it Out Here First! Barack Obama's "Presidential To-Do List"!

[GaryC 7]

My friend, whom I will call "Sneaky" for our purposes here, who is a high level insider in the Obama campaign, leaked to me (how cool am I?) Barack's as yet unrevealed two term "Presidential To-Do List" in the wake of his strong Super Tuesday showing. Hey all you Super Delegates! This ought to put a little gas in your tank!

Immediately declare war on hopelessness.

Create a Department of Hope.

Add Secretary of Hope to the cabinet.

Bring home the troops then hope Iraq doesn't fall apart.

Push for a UN resolution declaring that the UN has hope for all mankind.

Fund research into finding a way to build hope into all future weapons systems.

Strengthen Anti- Have No Hope laws.

Stock the Justice Department with hopeful lawyers.

Give Federal judges wider leeway in defining hopelessness.

Encourage judges with no hope to retire.

Appoint judges with hope to the Supreme Court.

Amend the Constitution to include hope as an inalienable right of all people, including those who are here illegally.

Create the Hope Corps to spread the concept of hope to hopeless nations around the world.

Require all schools receiving federal monies to include hope in their curriculum.

Require Federal programs such as Head Start to have hope.

Require all Federal employees to have hope. Promote those with hope faster than those who are hopeless.

Establish a "Hope Tax" to help people with no hope. The more hope you have, the more hope you owe.

Give hope tax breaks to married couples who have hope.

Give hope tax breaks to businesses that create hope.

Crack down on Big Businesses with no hope.

Remove tariffs on imported hope.

Ask God to give us a source of cheap, inexhaustible, clean energy by 2016 so nobody has to get angry at each other any more and we can all just relax for once.

Identify and encourage all people who have no hope by no later than 2018.

Make all poopy stuff go away by finding a new way to digest food by 2022.

Eliminate hopelessness worldwide by 2025!!!

I don't know about you, but I got a chill up my spine!

YES WE CAN!!! YES WE CAN!!! YES WE CAN!!!

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bill-cusack/...t-_b_85838.html

[Ban Hammer 13,643]

[almaty 19]

ust to follow-up briefly on Michael’s guest-post from yesterday, Sen. John McCain’s (R-Ariz.) new-found opposition to Roe v. Wade is rather remarkable, even for him.

In 1999, McCain was in New Hampshire, campaigning for the GOP nomination as a moderate. He proclaimed himself a pro-life candidate, but told reporters that “in the short term, or even the long term, I would not support repeal of Roe v. Wade.” He explained that overturning Roe would force “women in America to [undergo] illegal and dangerous operations.” Yesterday, campaigning for the GOP nomination as a conservative, McCain said the opposite.

STEPHANOPOULOS: Let me ask one question about abortion. Then I want to turn to Iraq. You’re for a constitutional amendment banning abortion, with some exceptions for life and rape and incest.

MCCAIN: Rape, incest and the life of the mother. Yes.

STEPHANOPOULOS: So is President Bush, yet that hasn’t advanced in the six years he’s been in office. What are you going to do to advance a constitutional amendment that President Bush hasn’t done?

MCCAIN: I don’t think a constitutional amendment is probably going to take place, but I do believe that it’s very likely or possible that the Supreme Court should — could overturn Roe v. Wade, which would then return these decisions to the states, which I support…. Just as I believe that the issue of gay marriage should be decided by the states, so do I believe that we would be better off by having Roe v. Wade return to the states.

The old McCain didn’t want an amendment and didn’t want Roe overturned. The new McCain completely disagrees with the old McCain.

It’s worth noting that politicians’ opinions on abortion can, and often do, “evolve” over time. ####### Gephardt and Al Gore, for example, both opposed abortion rights before eventually becoming pro-choice. With this in mind, McCain’s unexpected shift may simply reflect yet another pol whose thinking has changed over time.

Or, far more likely, McCain is once again abandoning any pretense of consistency and integrity, and is now willing to say literally anything to win.

Let’s return, once again, to McCain’s flourishing flip-flop list, which is now a Top 11 list.

* McCain criticized TV preacher Jerry Falwell as “an agent of intolerance” in 2002, but has since decided to cozy up to the man who said Americans “deserved” the 9/11 attacks. (Indeed, McCain has now hired Falwell’s debate coach.)

* McCain used to oppose Bush’s tax cuts for the very wealthy, but he reversed course in February.

* In 2000, McCain accused Texas businessmen Sam and Charles Wyly of being corrupt, spending “dirty money” to help finance Bush’s presidential campaign. McCain not only filed a complaint against the Wylys for allegedly violating campaign finance law, he also lashed out at them publicly. In April, McCain reached out to the Wylys for support.

* McCain supported a major campaign-finance reform measure that bore his name. In June, he abandoned his own legislation.

* McCain used to think that Grover Norquist was a crook and a corrupt shill for dictators. Then McCain got serious about running for president and began to reconcile with Norquist.

* McCain took a firm line in opposition to torture, and then caved to White House demands.

* McCain gave up on his signature policy issue, campaign-finance reform, and won’t back the same provision he sponsored just a couple of years ago.

* McCain was against presidential candidates campaigning at Bob Jones University before he was for it.

* McCain was anti-ethanol. Now he’s pro-ethanol.

* McCain was both for and against state promotion of the Confederate flag.

* And now he’s both for and against overturning Roe v. Wade.

It’s not exactly a newsflash that McCain is veering ridiculously to the right in a rather shameless attempt to reinvent himself, but Dems should take advantage of the situation and help establish the narrative now. Despite his rather embarrassing record of late, we still have major media figures telling the public that “no one would accuse McCain of equivocating on anything.”

Now is the time to begin characterizing McCain — accurately — as a man with no principle beliefs. Dems should not only criticize McCain’s constantly evolving opinions on nearly everything, they should openly mock him for it now, so that the storyline becomes second nature (like the GOP did with “serial exaggerator” Al Gore).

The nation is seeing McCain 2.0, and we like the old one better.