Olbermann attacks Hillary for not defending herself on Bachtel

[kaydee457 13]

Frankly, Olberman is a buffoon that longs for credibility as the anti-O'Reilly..... he hasn't quite reached his goal yet.

He's just another empty headed liberal flapping his gums about much he knows nothing about, but of course would like to portray that image.

Someone needs to slap him in the face repeatedly and perhaps he'll snap to consciousness and reality- and become a conservative! LOL

Edited April 8, 2008 by kaydee457

[HAL 9000 96]

Someone needs to slap him in the face repeatedly and perhaps he'll snap to consciousness and reality- and become a conservative! LOL

Spoken like a "true"conservative I gather? What do the more sensible conservatives have to add?

I somehow don't think this would get the media boy any reorientation, unless you are referring to him getting shell shocked more like you since it seems you are speaking from experience.

[Heracles 417]

Olbermann is probably the biggest dickhead I have ever seen. 99.9999% of his show is spent bashing and ridiculing others and their views. No actual ideas or views of his own.

Now that I think of it I am starting to see a pattern here. Especially when comparing him to certain clowns with similar personalities here on VJ..

[Trumplestiltskin 5,791]

Certain clowns... You mean:

Or maybe

How about

Surely not....

[Heracles 417]

Here is one of Dumbermann

Edited April 9, 2008 by Boo-Yah!

[Mr. Big Dog 10,747]

At this point in time, Illinois Sen. Barack Obama has a 95-percent chance of winning the Democratic nomination. The window for New York Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton to win enough pledged delegates to persuade superdelegates to vote for her is pretty much closed.

She can't win the remaining contests by sufficient margins to appreciably close the gap at this point, and superdelegates are breaking more toward Obama than Clinton. Short of a Rev. Jeremiah Wright-level embarrassment visiting Obama each week for four or five consecutive weeks, this thing is over.

http://nationaljournal.com/cook.htm

Too bad your 'numbers' have no source. Just speculation.

About Charlie Cook...

The New York Times has called Cook, "...one of the best political handicappers in the nation" and noted that The Cook Political Report is "...a newsletter that both parties regard as authoritative," while Bob Schieffer of CBS News has called the Cook Political Report, "the bible of the political community." The Wall Street Journal's Al Hunt once referred to Cook as "the Picasso of election analysis," while David Broder of The Washington Post has written that Charlie Cook is "perhaps the best non-partisan tracker of Congressional races."

http://www.cookpolitical.com/about/bios/cook.php

Still not a source for that number.

You have two more months to hold on to that little shred of hope.