New Feature?

[Krikit 1,164]

Good morning, Captain. Have you implemented a new feature on VJ? I was not able to view any threads until I logged in.

[derekkj 0]

Me either.

[Krikit 1,164]

Me either.

Oh good. I was starting to feel like it was me. Maybe it's just the Canaliens?

[Mags 112]

Me either.

Oh good. I was starting to feel like it was me. Maybe it's just the Canaliens?

Canaliens?

I too cannot read without logging in.

[Krikit 1,164]

Using my crack investigative techniques, I have deduced that this "feature" has not been applied across the board. There are 243 guests made up of 95 members and 14 anonymous members, which means that 134 guests have not had to log in.

[Mags 112]

Using my crack investigative techniques, I have deduced that this "feature" has not been applied across the board. There are 243 guests made up of 95 members and 14 anonymous members, which means that 134 guests have not had to log in.

Well, not necessarily, Nancy Drew.

They may be on other parts of the site, including the guides, news, home etc. They may also be trying to see the forums.

[Krikit 1,164]

Well, not necessarily, Nancy Drew.

They may be on other parts of the site, including the guides, news, home etc. They may also be trying to see the forums.

Drats! *removes smug look from face*

[Mags 112]

Well, not necessarily, Nancy Drew.

They may be on other parts of the site, including the guides, news, home etc. They may also be trying to see the forums.

Drats! *removes smug look from face*

Tee hee.

[SMB x2 0]

which means that 134 guests have not had to log in.

I think what's happened is that guest access (ie. when you're not logged in) has been turned off. Those 134 guests appear to be able to read the forum, but it just means they're viewing the main forum index. It's just how this forum software works like.

Stu

edit - drat, the other half just pointed out that Mags has already said this ><

Edited April 6, 2008 by SMB x2

[Krikit 1,164]

I think I'll rename this topic to the "Drats!" thread.

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

Ewok,

Was this intentional? I can't see how it could be, seeing how it's so contrary to VJ's purpose.

[mox 298]

Ewok,

Was this intentional? I can't see how it could be, seeing how it's so contrary to VJ's purpose.

Gotta agree with the troll. I'm hoping this was not intentional and will be backed out soon.

[Captain Ewok 1,891]

It was not intentional and will be fixed .

[Captain Ewok 1,891]

Looks like I overlooked something when I made a change last night (accident). I have fixed it now however ! Let me know if anything else is not working. I will fix it asap if not.

[w¡n9Nµ7 §£@¥€r 123]

You da man.